From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@gmail.com>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: generic/204 is crashing on linux-next when testing f2fs
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:20:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTHC2wtlC5d00xYL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251203021709.GA71988@macsyma.lan>
On 12/02, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:30:44AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > For now, I'll exclude generic/204 from the f2fs configs in my test
> > > appliance; if you have a chance to take a look at this and let me know
> > > when it might be safe to re-neable generic/204 for f2fs, that would be
> > > great. Thanks!
> >
> > Thank you for sharing the report. I didn't hit this in my setup tho, let
> > us try to reproduce it first.
>
> I'm not able to reproduce it by running generic/204 by itself; only
> when running the full auto group. (See below). The generic/204 test
> reformats the scratch partition at the beginning of the test, and
> doesn't depend on the test partition. Presumably, a previous test
> when running the auto group is somehow setting up generic/204 to fail.
>
> I'll try doing a run with KASAN enabled, in case that gives us some
> insight.
Thank you. fyi; I found some other xfstests failures, hence dropped some
suspicious patches and pushed today. Currently, my setup passed all the
test-cases with it, so if possible, could you please check probably tomorrow
linux-next?
Thanks,
>
> - Ted
>
> TESTRUNID: ltm-20251202161646
> KERNEL: kernel 6.18.0-rc4-xfstests-kasan-00072-g6fb67ac89690 #314 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Dec 2 16:05:26 EST 2025 x86_64
> CMDLINE: --kernel gs://gce-xfstests/kernel.deb -c f2fs/all -a -C 30 generic/204
> CPUS: 2
> MEM: 7680
>
> f2fs/default: 30 tests, 6043 seconds
> f2fs/encrypt: 30 tests, 6209 seconds
> f2fs/compress: 30 tests, 6140 seconds
> Totals: 90 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failures, 0 errors, 18392s
>
> FSTESTIMG: gce-xfstests/xfstests-amd64-202512020012
> FSTESTPRJ: gce-xfstests
> FSTESTVER: blktests 4badb27 (Fri, 31 Oct 2025 19:53:27 +0900)
> FSTESTVER: fio fio-3.41 (Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:21:17 -0600)
> FSTESTVER: fsverity v1.7 (Tue, 4 Nov 2025 17:28:17 -0800)
> FSTESTVER: ima-evm-utils v1.5 (Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:40:07 -0500)
> FSTESTVER: libaio libaio-0.3.108-82-gb8eadc9 (Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:33:11 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: ltp 20250930 (Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:53:45 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: quota v4.05-77-g22ff3d9 (Tue, 2 Sep 2025 08:12:02 -0400)
> FSTESTVER: util-linux v2.41.2 (Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:56:34 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v6.17.0 (Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:49:00 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld gce-xfstests-202504292206-34-g84a091b7 (Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:09:25 -0500)
> FSTESTVER: xfstests v2025.11.04-12-g64e3dbda7 (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:58:03 -0500)
> FSTESTVER: zz_build-distro trixie
> FSTESTSET: generic/204
> FSTESTOPT: count 30 fail_loop_count 0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] generic/204 is crashing on linux-next when testing f2fs
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:20:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTHC2wtlC5d00xYL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251203021709.GA71988@macsyma.lan>
On 12/02, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:30:44AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > For now, I'll exclude generic/204 from the f2fs configs in my test
> > > appliance; if you have a chance to take a look at this and let me know
> > > when it might be safe to re-neable generic/204 for f2fs, that would be
> > > great. Thanks!
> >
> > Thank you for sharing the report. I didn't hit this in my setup tho, let
> > us try to reproduce it first.
>
> I'm not able to reproduce it by running generic/204 by itself; only
> when running the full auto group. (See below). The generic/204 test
> reformats the scratch partition at the beginning of the test, and
> doesn't depend on the test partition. Presumably, a previous test
> when running the auto group is somehow setting up generic/204 to fail.
>
> I'll try doing a run with KASAN enabled, in case that gives us some
> insight.
Thank you. fyi; I found some other xfstests failures, hence dropped some
suspicious patches and pushed today. Currently, my setup passed all the
test-cases with it, so if possible, could you please check probably tomorrow
linux-next?
Thanks,
>
> - Ted
>
> TESTRUNID: ltm-20251202161646
> KERNEL: kernel 6.18.0-rc4-xfstests-kasan-00072-g6fb67ac89690 #314 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Dec 2 16:05:26 EST 2025 x86_64
> CMDLINE: --kernel gs://gce-xfstests/kernel.deb -c f2fs/all -a -C 30 generic/204
> CPUS: 2
> MEM: 7680
>
> f2fs/default: 30 tests, 6043 seconds
> f2fs/encrypt: 30 tests, 6209 seconds
> f2fs/compress: 30 tests, 6140 seconds
> Totals: 90 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failures, 0 errors, 18392s
>
> FSTESTIMG: gce-xfstests/xfstests-amd64-202512020012
> FSTESTPRJ: gce-xfstests
> FSTESTVER: blktests 4badb27 (Fri, 31 Oct 2025 19:53:27 +0900)
> FSTESTVER: fio fio-3.41 (Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:21:17 -0600)
> FSTESTVER: fsverity v1.7 (Tue, 4 Nov 2025 17:28:17 -0800)
> FSTESTVER: ima-evm-utils v1.5 (Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:40:07 -0500)
> FSTESTVER: libaio libaio-0.3.108-82-gb8eadc9 (Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:33:11 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: ltp 20250930 (Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:53:45 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: quota v4.05-77-g22ff3d9 (Tue, 2 Sep 2025 08:12:02 -0400)
> FSTESTVER: util-linux v2.41.2 (Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:56:34 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v6.17.0 (Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:49:00 +0200)
> FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld gce-xfstests-202504292206-34-g84a091b7 (Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:09:25 -0500)
> FSTESTVER: xfstests v2025.11.04-12-g64e3dbda7 (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:58:03 -0500)
> FSTESTVER: zz_build-distro trixie
> FSTESTSET: generic/204
> FSTESTOPT: count 30 fail_loop_count 0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-02 4:39 generic/204 is crashing on linux-next when testing f2fs Theodore Tso
2025-12-02 4:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Theodore Tso
2025-12-02 17:30 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2025-12-02 17:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2025-12-03 2:17 ` Theodore Tso
2025-12-03 2:17 ` [f2fs-dev] " Theodore Tso
2025-12-04 17:20 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2025-12-04 17:20 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTHC2wtlC5d00xYL@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.