All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Remove duplicate dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() function
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:22:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVPgL2AuAMpx76pI@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224-remove_dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability-v1-1-4302c9cdc316@oss.qualcomm.com>

Hello Qiang Yu,

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 02:10:46AM -0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> Remove dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() and replace its usage with
> dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability(). Both functions serve the same purpose
> of hiding PCIe extended capabilities, but dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability()
> provides a cleaner API that doesn't require the caller to specify the
> previous capability ID.
> 
> Compile-tested only. Runtime testing on RK3588 hardware would be
> appreciated.

This patch does not appy on top of pci/controller/dwc

Anyway, I applied it manually, and tested, thus:
Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Remove duplicate dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() function
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:22:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVPgL2AuAMpx76pI@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224-remove_dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability-v1-1-4302c9cdc316@oss.qualcomm.com>

Hello Qiang Yu,

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 02:10:46AM -0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> Remove dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() and replace its usage with
> dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability(). Both functions serve the same purpose
> of hiding PCIe extended capabilities, but dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability()
> provides a cleaner API that doesn't require the caller to specify the
> previous capability ID.
> 
> Compile-tested only. Runtime testing on RK3588 hardware would be
> appreciated.

This patch does not appy on top of pci/controller/dwc

Anyway, I applied it manually, and tested, thus:
Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-30 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-24 10:10 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Remove duplicate dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() function Qiang Yu
2025-12-24 10:10 ` Qiang Yu
2025-12-30 14:22 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-12-30 14:22   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 10:13   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 10:13     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 14:12     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-01-21 14:12       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-01-21 14:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-01-21 14:12   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aVPgL2AuAMpx76pI@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.