From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com, mani@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
vigneshr@ti.com, s-vadapalli@ti.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com,
l.stach@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com,
roy.zang@nxp.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, heiko@sntech.de,
srikanth.thokala@intel.com, marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, christian.bruel@foss.st.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
kishon@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, rongqianfeng@vivo.com,
18255117159@163.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com, linux.amoon@gmail.com,
vidyas@nvidia.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@axis.com,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI: dwc: ep: Support BAR subrange inbound mapping via Address Match Mode iATU
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:15:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWYbTt6UjlXb9Uk-@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113023715.3463724-5-den@valinux.co.jp>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:37:14AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Extend dw_pcie_ep_set_bar() to support inbound mappings for BAR
> subranges using Address Match Mode IB iATU.
>
> Rename the existing BAR-match helper into dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_bar() and
> introduce dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_addr() for Address Match Mode. When
> use_submap is set, read the assigned BAR base address and program one
> inbound iATU window per subrange. Validate the submap array before
> programming:
> - each subrange is aligned to pci->region_align
> - subranges cover the whole BAR (no gaps and no overlaps)
> - subranges are sorted in ascending order by offset
>
> Track Address Match Mode mappings and tear them down on clear_bar() and
> on set_bar() error paths to avoid leaving half-programmed state or
> untranslated BAR holes.
>
> Advertise this capability by setting subrange_mapping in the EPC
> features returned from dw_pcie_ep_get_features(). This also sets
> dynamic_inbound_mapping, which is a prerequisite for the subrange
> mapping flow. Note that vNTB already relies on this dynamic inbound
> mapping behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
> .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 1195d401df19..b2ea2c2c986f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -139,9 +139,10 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> - dma_addr_t parent_bus_addr, enum pci_barno bar,
> - size_t size)
> +/* BAR Match Mode inbound iATU mapping */
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_bar(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> + dma_addr_t parent_bus_addr, enum pci_barno bar,
> + size_t size)
> {
> int ret;
> u32 free_win;
> @@ -174,6 +175,208 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Inbound mapping bookkeeping for Address Match Mode */
> +struct dw_pcie_ib_map {
> + struct list_head list;
> + enum pci_barno bar;
> + u64 pci_addr;
> + u64 parent_bus_addr;
> + u64 size;
> + u32 index;
> +};
> +
> +static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, enum pci_barno bar)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + struct dw_pcie_ib_map *m, *tmp;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + u32 atu_index;
> +
> + /* Tear down the BAR Match Mode mapping, if any. */
> + if (ep->bar_to_atu[bar]) {
> + atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
> + dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, atu_index);
> + clear_bit(atu_index, ep->ib_window_map);
> + ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Tear down all Address Match Mode mappings, if any. */
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ep->ib_map_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(m, tmp, &ep->ib_map_list, list) {
> + if (m->bar != bar)
> + continue;
> + dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, m->index);
> + clear_bit(m->index, ep->ib_window_map);
> + list_del(&m->list);
> + devm_kfree(dev, m);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static u64 dw_pcie_ep_read_bar_assigned(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> + enum pci_barno bar, int flags)
> +{
> + u32 reg = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + (4 * bar);
> + u32 lo, hi;
> + u64 addr;
> +
> + lo = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
> +
> + if (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE)
> + return lo & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK;
> +
> + addr = lo & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> + if (!(flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))
> + return addr;
> +
> + hi = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, reg + 4);
> + return addr | ((u64)hi << 32);
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_validate_submap(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> + const struct pci_epf_bar_submap *submap,
> + unsigned int num_submap, size_t bar_size)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + u32 align = pci->region_align;
> + size_t expected = 0;
> + size_t size, off;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!align || !IS_ALIGNED(bar_size, align))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * The array is expected to be sorted by offset before calling this
> + * helper. With sorted entries, we can enforce a strict, gapless
> + * decomposition of the BAR:
> + * - each entry has a non-zero size
> + * - offset/size/phys_addr are aligned to pci->region_align
> + * - each entry lies within the BAR range
> + * - entries are contiguous (no overlaps, no holes)
> + * - the entries exactly cover the whole BAR
> + *
> + * Note: dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() also checks alignment for
> + * offset/phys_addr, but validating up-front avoids partially
> + * programming iATU windows in vain.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_submap; i++) {
> + off = submap[i].offset;
> + size = submap[i].size;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, align) || !IS_ALIGNED(off, align))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(submap[i].phys_addr, align))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (off > bar_size || size > bar_size - off)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Enforce contiguity (no overlaps, no holes). */
> + if (off != expected)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + expected += size;
> + }
> + if (expected != bar_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Address Match Mode inbound iATU mapping */
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_addr(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> + const struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar)
> +{
> + const struct pci_epf_bar_submap *submap = epf_bar->submap;
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + u64 pci_addr, parent_bus_addr;
> + struct dw_pcie_ib_map *new;
> + u64 size, off, base;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int free_win, ret;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!epf_bar->num_submap || !submap || !epf_bar->size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_validate_submap(ep, submap, epf_bar->num_submap,
> + epf_bar->size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + base = dw_pcie_ep_read_bar_assigned(ep, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
> + if (!base) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "BAR%u not assigned, cannot set up sub-range mappings\n",
> + bar);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Tear down any existing mappings before (re)programming. */
> + dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(ep, bar);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < epf_bar->num_submap; i++) {
> + off = submap[i].offset;
> + size = submap[i].size;
> + parent_bus_addr = submap[i].phys_addr;
> +
> + if (off > (~0ULL) - base) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + pci_addr = base + off;
> +
> + new = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> +
> + free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map,
> + pci->num_ib_windows);
> + if (free_win >= pci->num_ib_windows) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> + devm_kfree(dev, new);
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + set_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
> +
> + new->bar = bar;
> + new->index = free_win;
> + new->pci_addr = pci_addr;
> + new->parent_bus_addr = parent_bus_addr;
> + new->size = size;
> + list_add_tail(&new->list, &ep->ib_map_list);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(pci, free_win, type,
> + parent_bus_addr, pci_addr, size);
> + if (ret) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> + list_del(&new->list);
> + clear_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> + devm_kfree(dev, new);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(ep, bar);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int dw_pcie_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> struct dw_pcie_ob_atu_cfg *atu)
> {
> @@ -204,17 +407,15 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
> - u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
>
> - if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
> + if (!ep->epf_bar[bar])
> return;
>
> __dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
>
> - dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, atu_index);
> - clear_bit(atu_index, ep->ib_window_map);
> + dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(ep, bar);
> +
> ep->epf_bar[bar] = NULL;
> - ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = 0;
> }
>
> static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_get_rebar_offset(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> @@ -408,8 +609,12 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> else
> type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO;
>
> - ret = dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(ep, func_no, type, epf_bar->phys_addr, bar,
> - size);
> + if (epf_bar->use_submap)
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_addr(ep, func_no, type, epf_bar);
> + else
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_bar(ep, func_no, type,
> + epf_bar->phys_addr, bar, size);
> +
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -626,11 +831,22 @@ static const struct pci_epc_features*
> dw_pcie_ep_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no)
> {
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> + struct pci_epc_features *features;
>
> if (!ep->ops->get_features)
> return NULL;
>
> - return ep->ops->get_features(ep);
> + features = ep->ops->get_features(ep);
> + if (!features)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* All DWC-based glue drivers support dynamic inbound mapping */
> + features->dynamic_inbound_mapping = true;
I think you should create a separate patch, before this patch, that simply
sets:
features->dynamic_inbound_mapping = true;
Since that is technically a different feature, independent of this
feature, so it deserves its own patch.
With that fixed, this patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> +
> + /* All DWC-based glue drivers support inbound subrange mapping */
> + features->subrange_mapping = true;
> +
> + return features;
> }
>
> static const struct pci_epc_ops epc_ops = {
> @@ -1120,6 +1336,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->func_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->ib_map_list);
> + spin_lock_init(&ep->ib_map_lock);
> ep->msi_iatu_mapped = false;
> ep->msi_msg_addr = 0;
> ep->msi_map_size = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 4dda9a38d46b..969b1f32dddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ struct dw_pcie_ep {
> phys_addr_t *outbound_addr;
> unsigned long *ib_window_map;
> unsigned long *ob_window_map;
> + struct list_head ib_map_list;
> + spinlock_t ib_map_lock;
> void __iomem *msi_mem;
> phys_addr_t msi_mem_phys;
> struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> --
> 2.51.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com, mani@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
vigneshr@ti.com, s-vadapalli@ti.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com,
l.stach@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com,
roy.zang@nxp.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, heiko@sntech.de,
srikanth.thokala@intel.com, marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, christian.bruel@foss.st.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
kishon@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, rongqianfeng@vivo.com,
18255117159@163.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com, linux.amoon@gmail.com,
vidyas@nvidia.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@axis.com,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI: dwc: ep: Support BAR subrange inbound mapping via Address Match Mode iATU
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:15:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWYbTt6UjlXb9Uk-@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113023715.3463724-5-den@valinux.co.jp>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:37:14AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Extend dw_pcie_ep_set_bar() to support inbound mappings for BAR
> subranges using Address Match Mode IB iATU.
>
> Rename the existing BAR-match helper into dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_bar() and
> introduce dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_addr() for Address Match Mode. When
> use_submap is set, read the assigned BAR base address and program one
> inbound iATU window per subrange. Validate the submap array before
> programming:
> - each subrange is aligned to pci->region_align
> - subranges cover the whole BAR (no gaps and no overlaps)
> - subranges are sorted in ascending order by offset
>
> Track Address Match Mode mappings and tear them down on clear_bar() and
> on set_bar() error paths to avoid leaving half-programmed state or
> untranslated BAR holes.
>
> Advertise this capability by setting subrange_mapping in the EPC
> features returned from dw_pcie_ep_get_features(). This also sets
> dynamic_inbound_mapping, which is a prerequisite for the subrange
> mapping flow. Note that vNTB already relies on this dynamic inbound
> mapping behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
> .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 1195d401df19..b2ea2c2c986f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -139,9 +139,10 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> - dma_addr_t parent_bus_addr, enum pci_barno bar,
> - size_t size)
> +/* BAR Match Mode inbound iATU mapping */
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_bar(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> + dma_addr_t parent_bus_addr, enum pci_barno bar,
> + size_t size)
> {
> int ret;
> u32 free_win;
> @@ -174,6 +175,208 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Inbound mapping bookkeeping for Address Match Mode */
> +struct dw_pcie_ib_map {
> + struct list_head list;
> + enum pci_barno bar;
> + u64 pci_addr;
> + u64 parent_bus_addr;
> + u64 size;
> + u32 index;
> +};
> +
> +static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, enum pci_barno bar)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + struct dw_pcie_ib_map *m, *tmp;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + u32 atu_index;
> +
> + /* Tear down the BAR Match Mode mapping, if any. */
> + if (ep->bar_to_atu[bar]) {
> + atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
> + dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, atu_index);
> + clear_bit(atu_index, ep->ib_window_map);
> + ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Tear down all Address Match Mode mappings, if any. */
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ep->ib_map_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(m, tmp, &ep->ib_map_list, list) {
> + if (m->bar != bar)
> + continue;
> + dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, m->index);
> + clear_bit(m->index, ep->ib_window_map);
> + list_del(&m->list);
> + devm_kfree(dev, m);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static u64 dw_pcie_ep_read_bar_assigned(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> + enum pci_barno bar, int flags)
> +{
> + u32 reg = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + (4 * bar);
> + u32 lo, hi;
> + u64 addr;
> +
> + lo = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
> +
> + if (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE)
> + return lo & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK;
> +
> + addr = lo & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> + if (!(flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))
> + return addr;
> +
> + hi = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, reg + 4);
> + return addr | ((u64)hi << 32);
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_validate_submap(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> + const struct pci_epf_bar_submap *submap,
> + unsigned int num_submap, size_t bar_size)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + u32 align = pci->region_align;
> + size_t expected = 0;
> + size_t size, off;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!align || !IS_ALIGNED(bar_size, align))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * The array is expected to be sorted by offset before calling this
> + * helper. With sorted entries, we can enforce a strict, gapless
> + * decomposition of the BAR:
> + * - each entry has a non-zero size
> + * - offset/size/phys_addr are aligned to pci->region_align
> + * - each entry lies within the BAR range
> + * - entries are contiguous (no overlaps, no holes)
> + * - the entries exactly cover the whole BAR
> + *
> + * Note: dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() also checks alignment for
> + * offset/phys_addr, but validating up-front avoids partially
> + * programming iATU windows in vain.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_submap; i++) {
> + off = submap[i].offset;
> + size = submap[i].size;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, align) || !IS_ALIGNED(off, align))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(submap[i].phys_addr, align))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (off > bar_size || size > bar_size - off)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Enforce contiguity (no overlaps, no holes). */
> + if (off != expected)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + expected += size;
> + }
> + if (expected != bar_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Address Match Mode inbound iATU mapping */
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_addr(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> + const struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar)
> +{
> + const struct pci_epf_bar_submap *submap = epf_bar->submap;
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + u64 pci_addr, parent_bus_addr;
> + struct dw_pcie_ib_map *new;
> + u64 size, off, base;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int free_win, ret;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!epf_bar->num_submap || !submap || !epf_bar->size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_validate_submap(ep, submap, epf_bar->num_submap,
> + epf_bar->size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + base = dw_pcie_ep_read_bar_assigned(ep, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
> + if (!base) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "BAR%u not assigned, cannot set up sub-range mappings\n",
> + bar);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Tear down any existing mappings before (re)programming. */
> + dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(ep, bar);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < epf_bar->num_submap; i++) {
> + off = submap[i].offset;
> + size = submap[i].size;
> + parent_bus_addr = submap[i].phys_addr;
> +
> + if (off > (~0ULL) - base) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + pci_addr = base + off;
> +
> + new = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> +
> + free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map,
> + pci->num_ib_windows);
> + if (free_win >= pci->num_ib_windows) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> + devm_kfree(dev, new);
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + set_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
> +
> + new->bar = bar;
> + new->index = free_win;
> + new->pci_addr = pci_addr;
> + new->parent_bus_addr = parent_bus_addr;
> + new->size = size;
> + list_add_tail(&new->list, &ep->ib_map_list);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(pci, free_win, type,
> + parent_bus_addr, pci_addr, size);
> + if (ret) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> + list_del(&new->list);
> + clear_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->ib_map_lock, flags);
> + devm_kfree(dev, new);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(ep, bar);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int dw_pcie_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> struct dw_pcie_ob_atu_cfg *atu)
> {
> @@ -204,17 +407,15 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
> - u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
>
> - if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
> + if (!ep->epf_bar[bar])
> return;
>
> __dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
>
> - dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, atu_index);
> - clear_bit(atu_index, ep->ib_window_map);
> + dw_pcie_ep_clear_ib_maps(ep, bar);
> +
> ep->epf_bar[bar] = NULL;
> - ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = 0;
> }
>
> static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_get_rebar_offset(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> @@ -408,8 +609,12 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> else
> type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO;
>
> - ret = dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(ep, func_no, type, epf_bar->phys_addr, bar,
> - size);
> + if (epf_bar->use_submap)
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_addr(ep, func_no, type, epf_bar);
> + else
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_ib_atu_bar(ep, func_no, type,
> + epf_bar->phys_addr, bar, size);
> +
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -626,11 +831,22 @@ static const struct pci_epc_features*
> dw_pcie_ep_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no)
> {
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> + struct pci_epc_features *features;
>
> if (!ep->ops->get_features)
> return NULL;
>
> - return ep->ops->get_features(ep);
> + features = ep->ops->get_features(ep);
> + if (!features)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* All DWC-based glue drivers support dynamic inbound mapping */
> + features->dynamic_inbound_mapping = true;
I think you should create a separate patch, before this patch, that simply
sets:
features->dynamic_inbound_mapping = true;
Since that is technically a different feature, independent of this
feature, so it deserves its own patch.
With that fixed, this patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> +
> + /* All DWC-based glue drivers support inbound subrange mapping */
> + features->subrange_mapping = true;
> +
> + return features;
> }
>
> static const struct pci_epc_ops epc_ops = {
> @@ -1120,6 +1336,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->func_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->ib_map_list);
> + spin_lock_init(&ep->ib_map_lock);
> ep->msi_iatu_mapped = false;
> ep->msi_msg_addr = 0;
> ep->msi_map_size = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 4dda9a38d46b..969b1f32dddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ struct dw_pcie_ep {
> phys_addr_t *outbound_addr;
> unsigned long *ib_window_map;
> unsigned long *ob_window_map;
> + struct list_head ib_map_list;
> + spinlock_t ib_map_lock;
> void __iomem *msi_mem;
> phys_addr_t msi_mem_phys;
> struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> --
> 2.51.0
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 2:37 [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI: endpoint: BAR subrange mapping support Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] PCI: endpoint: Add " Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 10:13 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 10:13 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 16:07 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 16:07 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] PCI: dwc: Allow glue drivers to return mutable EPC features Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 10:14 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 10:14 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 2:37 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI: endpoint: Add dynamic_inbound_mapping EPC feature Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 10:12 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 10:12 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 2:37 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI: dwc: ep: Support BAR subrange inbound mapping via Address Match Mode iATU Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 10:15 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-01-13 10:15 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 10:27 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 10:27 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 2:37 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] Documentation: PCI: endpoint: Clarify pci_epc_set_bar() usage Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Koichiro Den
2026-01-13 10:17 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-13 10:17 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWYbTt6UjlXb9Uk-@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.bruel@foss.st.com \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
--cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rongqianfeng@vivo.com \
--cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=srikanth.thokala@intel.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.