From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] x86/HPET: avoid indirect call to event handler
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:19:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXD8eUkfsCKc_iS-@Mac.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1af753e5-33a1-46de-a407-969059e7228f@suse.com>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 03:37:04PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It's only ever handle_hpet_broadcast() that's used. While we now don't
> enable IRQs right away, still play safe and convert the function pointer
> to a boolean, to make sure no calls occur too early.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
> v2: Re-base over changes earlier in the series.
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct hpet_event_channel
> s_time_t next_event;
> cpumask_var_t cpumask;
> spinlock_t lock;
> - void (*event_handler)(struct hpet_event_channel *ch);
> + bool event_handler;
It would be nice to also get rid of this field, but I don't see any
other input that we could use to ensure the channel is ready to
receive interrupts.
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 14:35 [PATCH v4 0/8] x86/HPET: tidying / improvements Jan Beulich
2025-11-17 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] x86/HPET: avoid indirect call to event handler Jan Beulich
2026-01-21 16:19 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2025-11-17 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/HPET: make another channel flags update atomic Jan Beulich
2026-01-21 17:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-11-17 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/HPET: move legacy tick IRQ count adjustment Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 8:50 ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-01-22 10:31 ` Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 11:21 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-11-17 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] x86/HPET: reduce hpet_next_event() call sites Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 9:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-11-17 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] x86/HPET: drop "long timeout" handling from reprogram_hpet_evt_channel() Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 9:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-01-22 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2025-11-17 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/HPET: simplify "expire" check a little in reprogram_hpet_evt_channel() Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 9:18 ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-01-22 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 10:10 ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-01-22 10:15 ` Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 11:30 ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-01-22 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2025-11-17 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] x86/HPET: drop .set_affinity hook Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 10:05 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-11-17 14:40 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] x86/HPET: don't arbitrarily cap delta in reprogram_hpet_evt_channel() Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 10:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-01-22 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2026-01-22 11:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXD8eUkfsCKc_iS-@Mac.lan \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.