From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
joro@8bytes.org, jgg@nvidia.com, balbirs@nvidia.com,
miko.lenczewski@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
kevin.tian@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:53:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXNFGNM5MmEuyUSG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c94c5194871ee1a0f3a6b49e18818b88f51226d.1766174731.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 12:11:25PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>
> Create a new data structure to hold an array of invalidations that need to
> be performed for the domain based on what masters are attached, to replace
> the single smmu pointer and linked list of masters in the current design.
>
> Each array entry holds one of the invalidation actions - S1_ASID, S2_VMID,
> ATS or their variant with information to feed invalidation commands to HW.
> It is structured so that multiple SMMUs can participate in the same array,
> removing one key limitation of the current system.
>
> To maximize performance, a sorted array is used as the data structure. It
> allows grouping SYNCs together to parallelize invalidations. For instance,
> it will group all the ATS entries after the ASID/VMID entry, so they will
> all be pushed to the PCI devices in parallel with one SYNC.
>
> To minimize the locking cost on the invalidation fast path (reader of the
> invalidation array), the array is managed with RCU.
>
> Provide a set of APIs to add/delete entries to/from an array, which cover
> cannot-fail attach cases, e.g. attaching to arm_smmu_blocked_domain. Also
> add kunit coverage for those APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 98 +++++++
> .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c | 92 +++++++
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 448 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Thanks,
Praan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 20:11 [PATCH v9 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce an RCU-protected invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Explicitly set smmu_domain->stage for SVA Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 9:49 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add an inline arm_smmu_domain_free() Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 9:50 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 9:53 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-01-23 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-23 17:35 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 17:51 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-23 17:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 19:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-23 19:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 14:54 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-26 15:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pre-allocate a per-master invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 9:54 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs when attaching masters Nicolin Chen
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_invs based arm_smmu_domain_inv_range() Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 9:48 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-01-23 13:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 16:38 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 17:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 18:07 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 18:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 18:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 19:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 20:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-28 0:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-23 17:05 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-23 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-23 17:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 20:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-26 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-26 15:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-26 16:02 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-26 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-26 18:56 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-27 3:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 17:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-19 20:11 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Perform per-domain invalidations using arm_smmu_invs Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 17:07 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-23 17:47 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-23 19:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-19 17:10 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce an RCU-protected invalidation array Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXNFGNM5MmEuyUSG@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.