All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: always set BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 22:43:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYWNhtixUGuj3hat@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205173928.3166880-2-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>

On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 06:39:29PM +0100, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> DRBD requires stable pages because it may read the same bio data
> multiple times for local disk I/O and network transmission, and in
> some cases for calculating checksums.
> 
> The BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES flag is set when the device is first
> created, but blk_set_stacking_limits() clears it whenever a
> backing device is attached. In some cases the flag may be
> inherited from the backing device, but we want it to be enabled
> at all times.

This looks like a bug.  If an underlying device requires
BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES, the upper device needs to inherit it.

> Note: this commit is based on the for-6.19/block tree in case it is
> still possible to take it into the 6.19 release as this *could* lead
> to silent data corruption. However, due to other protection
> mechanisms in DRBD, this is relatively unlikely to happen in the
> real world and we have not seen any corresponding reports from users.
> So if this only lands in 6.20/7.0, it is also fine.

I'm fine with this as a hot fix for 6.19 and -stable:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

But can you please also do the proper block layer fix and then
revert the drbd one?


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: always set BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 22:43:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYWNhtixUGuj3hat@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205173928.3166880-2-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>

On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 06:39:29PM +0100, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> DRBD requires stable pages because it may read the same bio data
> multiple times for local disk I/O and network transmission, and in
> some cases for calculating checksums.
> 
> The BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES flag is set when the device is first
> created, but blk_set_stacking_limits() clears it whenever a
> backing device is attached. In some cases the flag may be
> inherited from the backing device, but we want it to be enabled
> at all times.

This looks like a bug.  If an underlying device requires
BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES, the upper device needs to inherit it.

> Note: this commit is based on the for-6.19/block tree in case it is
> still possible to take it into the 6.19 release as this *could* lead
> to silent data corruption. However, due to other protection
> mechanisms in DRBD, this is relatively unlikely to happen in the
> real world and we have not seen any corresponding reports from users.
> So if this only lands in 6.20/7.0, it is also fine.

I'm fine with this as a hot fix for 6.19 and -stable:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

But can you please also do the proper block layer fix and then
revert the drbd one?


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-06  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05 17:39 [PATCH] drbd: always set BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-02-05 17:39 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-02-06  6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-02-06  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-12 15:01   ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-02-12 15:01     ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-02-13  6:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13  6:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-11 17:36 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-11 17:36   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aYWNhtixUGuj3hat@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.