From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Drop local devm_mux_state_get_optional()
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:47:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYyrsPTH1923jV7y@vaman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpY2X8hephSfHq7rj_DaKX76ZSkWSCYXrGTEBUFHkvOzg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10-02-26, 14:34, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 at 11:53, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> >
> > Now the mux core provides devm_mux_state_get_optional():
> >
> > drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c:944:1: error: static declaration of ‘devm_mux_state_get_optional’ follows non-static
> > declaration
> > 944 | devm_mux_state_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c:20:
> > include/linux/mux/consumer.h:64:19: note: previous declaration of ‘devm_mux_state_get_optional’ with type ‘struct mux_state *(struct device *, const char *)’
> > 64 | struct mux_state *devm_mux_state_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Fix this by dropping the temporary local wrapper.
> >
> > Fixes: ad314348ceb4fe1f ("mux: Add helper functions for getting optional and selected mux-state")
> > Fixes: 8bb92fd7a0407792 ("phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Use mux-state for phyrst management")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> Thanks Geert for helping out!
>
> > ---
> > - ad314348ceb4fe1f is in mmc/next, and a PR has already been sent
> > https://lore.kernel.org/20260209133441.556464-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
> > - 8bb92fd7a0407792 is in phy/next
>
> Vinod, do you want to pick up the $subject patch as a fix for 7.0-rc1
> or do you prefer me to handle it?
Should I drop the 8bb92fd7a0407792 and it makes things easier for
everyone and then we can pick fixed commit for 7.1 cycle..
Does that work for everyone. I was about to send PR, will hold off for a
bit.
Thanks
--
~Vinod
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Drop local devm_mux_state_get_optional()
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:47:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYyrsPTH1923jV7y@vaman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpY2X8hephSfHq7rj_DaKX76ZSkWSCYXrGTEBUFHkvOzg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10-02-26, 14:34, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 at 11:53, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> >
> > Now the mux core provides devm_mux_state_get_optional():
> >
> > drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c:944:1: error: static declaration of ‘devm_mux_state_get_optional’ follows non-static
> > declaration
> > 944 | devm_mux_state_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c:20:
> > include/linux/mux/consumer.h:64:19: note: previous declaration of ‘devm_mux_state_get_optional’ with type ‘struct mux_state *(struct device *, const char *)’
> > 64 | struct mux_state *devm_mux_state_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Fix this by dropping the temporary local wrapper.
> >
> > Fixes: ad314348ceb4fe1f ("mux: Add helper functions for getting optional and selected mux-state")
> > Fixes: 8bb92fd7a0407792 ("phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Use mux-state for phyrst management")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> Thanks Geert for helping out!
>
> > ---
> > - ad314348ceb4fe1f is in mmc/next, and a PR has already been sent
> > https://lore.kernel.org/20260209133441.556464-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
> > - 8bb92fd7a0407792 is in phy/next
>
> Vinod, do you want to pick up the $subject patch as a fix for 7.0-rc1
> or do you prefer me to handle it?
Should I drop the 8bb92fd7a0407792 and it makes things easier for
everyone and then we can pick fixed commit for 7.1 cycle..
Does that work for everyone. I was about to send PR, will hold off for a
bit.
Thanks
--
~Vinod
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 10:53 [PATCH next] phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Drop local devm_mux_state_get_optional() Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-10 10:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-10 11:26 ` Tommaso Merciai
2026-02-10 11:26 ` Tommaso Merciai
2026-02-10 13:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-02-10 13:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-02-11 16:17 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2026-02-11 16:17 ` Vinod Koul
2026-02-11 16:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-11 16:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-12 4:59 ` Vinod Koul
2026-02-12 4:59 ` Vinod Koul
2026-02-12 9:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-02-12 9:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-02-12 10:39 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-02-12 10:39 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-02-12 11:17 ` Vinod Koul
2026-02-12 11:17 ` Vinod Koul
2026-02-11 16:21 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-11 16:21 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-12 0:39 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-12 0:39 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYyrsPTH1923jV7y@vaman \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.