Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next, v3] ixgbe: fix unaligned u32 access in ixgbe_update_flash_X550()

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 04:02:53PM +0000, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2026 4:14 PM
> > To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> > Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org;
> > Jagielski, Jedrzej <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> > <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de;
> > netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [iwl-next,v3] ixgbe: fix unaligned u32 access in
> > ixgbe_update_flash_X550()
> > 
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> > email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> > 
> > For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-
> > local.html
> > ---
> > ixgbe: fix unaligned u32 access in ixgbe_update_flash_X550()
> > 
> > This commit adds a u32 member to union ixgbe_hic_hdr2 to ensure 4-byte
> > alignment on the stack, preventing unaligned 32-bit accesses when
> > ixgbe_host_interface_command() treats the buffer as a u32 array.
> > 
> > > ixgbe: fix unaligned u32 access in ixgbe_update_flash_X550()
> > >
> > > ixgbe_host_interface_command() treats its buffer as a u32 array. The
> > > local buffer we pass in was a union of byte-sized fields, which
> > gives
> > > it 1-byte alignment on the stack. On strict-align architectures this
> > > can cause unaligned 32-bit accesses.
> > >
> > > Add a u32 member to union ixgbe_hic_hdr2 so the object is 4-byte
> > > aligned, and pass the u32 member when calling
> > > ixgbe_host_interface_command().
> > >
> > > No functional change on x86; prevents unaligned accesses on
> > > architectures that enforce natural alignment.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 49425dfc7451 ("ixgbe: Add support for x550em_a 10G MAC type")
> > 
> > Does this Fixes tag point to the correct commit? The alignment issue
> > appears to have been introduced by commit 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add
> > X550 support function pointers") from 2014-12-05, which introduced
> > both the union ixgbe_hic_hdr2 without a u32 member for proper
> > alignment and the
> > ixgbe_update_flash_X550() function that passes this buffer to
> > ixgbe_host_interface_command().
> 
> Commit is correct, please configure your AI to look all the history of the patch, where I explained that it was a 0 day issue.

Sorry about that. I did look over this myself, but I guess I must
a have forgotten to look over the patch history at the time.

...