From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ivecera@redhat.com,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix missing dpll notification for SW pins
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:43:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZbbMGERNIYn68W4@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260218211414.1411163-1-poros@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 10:14:14PM +0100, Petr Oros wrote:
> ice_dpll_notify_changes() sends dpll_pin_change_ntf() only for the
> direct CGU input pin stored in d->active_input. Software-controlled
> pins (SMA/U.FL) are separate dpll_pin objects that wrap a backing CGU
> input, but they never receive a change notification. As a result,
> userspace consumers such as synce4l that monitor SMA pins via dpll
> netlink never learn when the pin state transitions (e.g. from
> SELECTABLE to CONNECTED), even though 'dpll pin show' reports the
> correct state on demand.
>
> When the active input changes, also send dpll_pin_change_ntf() for any
> registered SMA/U.FL input pin whose backing CGU input matches the old
> or new active input.
>
> Fixes: 2dd5d03c77e2 ("ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control")
> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> index c2ad39bfe177db..6f855fe4c78d62 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> @@ -2470,13 +2470,17 @@ static u64 ice_generate_clock_id(struct ice_pf *pf)
> */
> static void ice_dpll_notify_changes(struct ice_dpll *d)
> {
> + struct ice_dplls *dplls = &d->pf->dplls;
> bool pin_notified = false;
> + int i;
>
> if (d->prev_dpll_state != d->dpll_state) {
> d->prev_dpll_state = d->dpll_state;
> dpll_device_change_ntf(d->dpll);
> }
> if (d->prev_input != d->active_input) {
> + struct dpll_pin *old = d->prev_input;
nit: For consistency I think you can reduce the scope of i to this block.
Or even declare it inside for().
> +
> if (d->prev_input)
> dpll_pin_change_ntf(d->prev_input);
> d->prev_input = d->active_input;
> @@ -2484,6 +2488,20 @@ static void ice_dpll_notify_changes(struct ice_dpll *d)
> dpll_pin_change_ntf(d->active_input);
> pin_notified = true;
> }
> + for (i = 0; i < ICE_DPLL_PIN_SW_NUM; i++) {
> + if (dplls->sma[i].pin &&
> + dplls->sma[i].direction ==
> + DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT &&
> + (dplls->sma[i].input->pin == d->active_input ||
> + dplls->sma[i].input->pin == old))
> + dpll_pin_change_ntf(dplls->sma[i].pin);
> + if (dplls->ufl[i].pin &&
> + dplls->ufl[i].direction ==
> + DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT &&
> + (dplls->ufl[i].input->pin == d->active_input ||
> + dplls->ufl[i].input->pin == old))
> + dpll_pin_change_ntf(dplls->ufl[i].pin);
The condition above is pretty dense. And repeated.
I wonder if a helper would improve readability here.
> + }
> }
> if (d->prev_phase_offset != d->phase_offset) {
> d->prev_phase_offset = d->phase_offset;
> --
> 2.52.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ivecera@redhat.com,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix missing dpll notification for SW pins
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:43:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZbbMGERNIYn68W4@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260218211414.1411163-1-poros@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 10:14:14PM +0100, Petr Oros wrote:
> ice_dpll_notify_changes() sends dpll_pin_change_ntf() only for the
> direct CGU input pin stored in d->active_input. Software-controlled
> pins (SMA/U.FL) are separate dpll_pin objects that wrap a backing CGU
> input, but they never receive a change notification. As a result,
> userspace consumers such as synce4l that monitor SMA pins via dpll
> netlink never learn when the pin state transitions (e.g. from
> SELECTABLE to CONNECTED), even though 'dpll pin show' reports the
> correct state on demand.
>
> When the active input changes, also send dpll_pin_change_ntf() for any
> registered SMA/U.FL input pin whose backing CGU input matches the old
> or new active input.
>
> Fixes: 2dd5d03c77e2 ("ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control")
> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> index c2ad39bfe177db..6f855fe4c78d62 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> @@ -2470,13 +2470,17 @@ static u64 ice_generate_clock_id(struct ice_pf *pf)
> */
> static void ice_dpll_notify_changes(struct ice_dpll *d)
> {
> + struct ice_dplls *dplls = &d->pf->dplls;
> bool pin_notified = false;
> + int i;
>
> if (d->prev_dpll_state != d->dpll_state) {
> d->prev_dpll_state = d->dpll_state;
> dpll_device_change_ntf(d->dpll);
> }
> if (d->prev_input != d->active_input) {
> + struct dpll_pin *old = d->prev_input;
nit: For consistency I think you can reduce the scope of i to this block.
Or even declare it inside for().
> +
> if (d->prev_input)
> dpll_pin_change_ntf(d->prev_input);
> d->prev_input = d->active_input;
> @@ -2484,6 +2488,20 @@ static void ice_dpll_notify_changes(struct ice_dpll *d)
> dpll_pin_change_ntf(d->active_input);
> pin_notified = true;
> }
> + for (i = 0; i < ICE_DPLL_PIN_SW_NUM; i++) {
> + if (dplls->sma[i].pin &&
> + dplls->sma[i].direction ==
> + DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT &&
> + (dplls->sma[i].input->pin == d->active_input ||
> + dplls->sma[i].input->pin == old))
> + dpll_pin_change_ntf(dplls->sma[i].pin);
> + if (dplls->ufl[i].pin &&
> + dplls->ufl[i].direction ==
> + DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT &&
> + (dplls->ufl[i].input->pin == d->active_input ||
> + dplls->ufl[i].input->pin == old))
> + dpll_pin_change_ntf(dplls->ufl[i].pin);
The condition above is pretty dense. And repeated.
I wonder if a helper would improve readability here.
> + }
> }
> if (d->prev_phase_offset != d->phase_offset) {
> d->prev_phase_offset = d->phase_offset;
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-18 21:14 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix missing dpll notification for SW pins Petr Oros
2026-02-18 21:14 ` Petr Oros
2026-02-19 9:43 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-02-19 9:43 ` Simon Horman
2026-02-19 11:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kwapulinski, Piotr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZbbMGERNIYn68W4@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.