From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] 64k (or 16k) base page size on x86
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:27:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZcrj4iYLzXk7SPz@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219152045.GR1395416@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 04:20:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 04:17:29PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 03:08:51PM +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > > No, there's no new hardware (that I know of). I want to explore what page size
> > > means.
> > >
> > > The kernel uses the same value - PAGE_SIZE - for two things:
> > >
> > > - the order-0 buddy allocation size;
> > >
> > > - the granularity of virtual address space mapping;
> > >
> > > I think we can benefit from separating these two meanings and allowing
> > > order-0 allocations to be larger than the virtual address space covered by a
> > > PTE entry.
> >
> > Didn't AA do this a decade ago or somesuch?
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/240914/
Oh, 2007. It predates me in kernel. Will read up. Thanks!
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 15:08 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] 64k (or 16k) base page size on x86 Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-19 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:27 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-02-19 15:33 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-02-19 15:50 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-19 15:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-19 19:31 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-02-19 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-19 15:54 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-19 16:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-20 2:55 ` Zi Yan
2026-02-19 17:09 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-20 10:24 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-20 12:07 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-20 16:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-20 19:33 ` Kalesh Singh
2026-02-23 11:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-23 11:13 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-23 11:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-23 12:16 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-23 15:14 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-23 15:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-23 15:45 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-23 15:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-23 16:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-02-23 16:34 ` David Laight
2026-02-19 23:24 ` Kalesh Singh
2026-02-20 12:10 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-20 19:21 ` Kalesh Singh
2026-02-19 17:08 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-19 22:05 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-20 3:28 ` Liam R. Howlett
2026-02-20 12:33 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-20 15:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
2026-02-20 15:50 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-19 17:30 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-19 22:14 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-19 22:21 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-19 17:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-19 22:26 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-20 9:04 ` David Laight
2026-02-20 12:12 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-04-29 14:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-29 15:26 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-05-01 18:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-01 18:00 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-05-01 18:02 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-01 18:12 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-05-01 18:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZcrj4iYLzXk7SPz@thinkstation \
--to=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.