* [KJ] Re: [PATCH] [0/29] vfree() checking cleanups
@ 2005-01-04 23:17 James Lamanna
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: James Lamanna @ 2005-01-04 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 512 bytes --]
Due to a problem with Google's SMTP setup (I think it might be a TLS
issue), some of the patches got messed up.
Here's a good set...
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:56:20 -0800, James Lamanna <jlamanna@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following patches against 2.6.10 clean up the case of:
> if (var)
> vfree(var);
>
> This check is redundant since it occurs in vfree()
>
> There is a similar cleanup for kfree(), but I haven't gotten to that
> one yet since there are many many many more of those.
>
> -- James Lamanna
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-01-04 23:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-04 23:17 [KJ] Re: [PATCH] [0/29] vfree() checking cleanups James Lamanna
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.