Re: Consider applying patch to 6.12.y

[Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:15:49AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>Hi Greg, Sasha,
>
>Sending this separately in case you don't track all replies to the
>`FAILED:` messages:
>
>  https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72nHESphKjW7uXm2D7HCNWNxmZ3nv+CSgrzEGgSKZ4_taA@mail.gmail.com/
>
>I am not sure why the patch failed to apply -- I would like to
>understand what happened there, in case I am missing something. I
>suspect something odd happened, since other of those `FAILED:`
>messages were strange too, i.e. most of them didn't seem to apply the
>`# ...` instructions, which is why most failed.
>
>But at least for that particular one, the patch should still be
>applied and it should have been cherry-pickable as far as I can tell:
>
>  0a9be83e57de ("rust: kbuild: pass `-Zunstable-options` for Rust 1.95.0")
>
>So if you cannot apply it, please let me know!

Hi Miguel,

It's already in the 6.12 tree. There's a quick explanation of what went wrong
with those queues (and caused the FAILED: spam) here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/aaWWE5uQqz_eG69i@laps/ .

I'll spin up -rc2 with those missing commits.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha