All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 05:13:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aagv8y96vGHvbOdX@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aacv39AZ5P9ubOZ5@bfoster>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 02:00:47PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Oh I see. If I follow the high level flow here, zoned mode always writes
> through COW fork delalloc, and then writeback appears to remove the
> delalloc mapping and then does whatever physical zone allocation magic
> further down in the submission path. So there are no unwritten extents
> nor COW fork preallocation as far as I can tell.

Yes.

> I think that actually means the IOMAP_ZERO logic for the zoned
> iomap_begin handler is slightly wrong as it is. I was originally
> thinking this was just another COW fork prealloc situation, but in
> actuality it looks like zoned mode intentionally creates this COW fork
> blocks over data fork hole scenario on first write to a previously
> unallocated file range.

Yes.

> IOMAP_ZERO returns a hole whenever one exists in the data fork, so that
> means we're not properly reporting a data mapping up until the range is
> allocated in the data fork (i.e. writeback occurs at least once). The
> reason this has worked is presumably because iomap does the flush when
> the range of a reported hole is dirty, so it retries the mapping lookup

Yeah.

> So the fix I posted works just the same.. lifting the flush just
> preserves how things work today. But I think what this means is that we
> should also be able to rework zoned mode IOMAP_ZERO handling to require
> neither the flush nor dirty folio lookup. It should be able to return a
> mapping to zero if blocks exist in either fork (allocating to COW fork
> if necessary), otherwise report a hole.

Yeah.  If there still is a delalloc mapping in the COW fork we could
actually steal that for zeroing.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-04 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 17:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-02 19:02       ` Brian Foster
2026-03-03 14:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-03 19:00           ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 13:13             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-04 14:17               ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 14:41                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 15:02                   ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 17:04                     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 14:11                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-05 15:06                         ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 16:10                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 10:20   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-13 16:24     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-18 17:41       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:18     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-17 15:06   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-18 15:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-18 17:40       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:19     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aagv8y96vGHvbOdX@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.