From: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>
To: Yan Yan <evitayan@google.com>
Cc: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Chiachang Wang <chiachangwang@google.com>,
devel@linux-ipsec.org, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Harold <nharold@google.com>
Subject: Re: [devel-ipsec] Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v5 8/8] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 08:51:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aak2BWlUbCCGbhp4@Antony2201.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADHa2dAxVFQULCKnsjSmSPrK+VTJyyT-5P5BAYGdhO5wKDKqig@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 05:44:51PM -0800, Yan Yan via Devel wrote:
> Hi Antony,
>
> May I request that we also support updating the XFRMA_SET_MARK as part
> of the new XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE message?
yes I can add that. I would add XFRMA_SET_MARK/XFRMA_SET_MARK_MASK together.
If you set only the SET_MARK mask will be 0xffffffff.
I am actually using xfrm_smark_init() which will accept both.
> In Android, the primary use case for migration is switching the
> underlying physical network for an IPsec tunnel (e.g. VPN, Wifi
> calling). Currently, due to the limits of XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE, we are
> forced to use a separate UPDSA call to update the set-mark. Supporting
> XFRMA_SET_MARK within the migrate message would allow us to update the
> addresses and the routing mark together in one atomic call.
>
> Regarding the logic, I believe the set-mark can follow the same
> omit-to-clear pattern as XFRMA_ENCAP and XFRMA_OFFLOAD_DEV.
>
>
> What do you think?
good idea. I would try to test, otherwise please review/test this sepcific
part xfrm_smark_init() set 0/0 when there is no SET_MASK.
Thanks.
-antony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 10:41 [PATCH ipsec-next v5 0/8] xfrm: XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE new netlink message Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 1/8] xfrm: add missing __rcu annotation to nlsk Antony Antony
2026-02-26 17:07 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-05 7:46 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 2/8] xfrm: remove redundant assignments Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 3/8] xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP Antony Antony
2026-01-30 11:28 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-02 12:57 ` Antony Antony
[not found] ` <CADhJOfbkUFaPfxTBrmOnrEh2JvxPKpkxaRrSdJHZGxeoQsQTcw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-02-02 19:38 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-24 3:28 ` Yan Yan
2026-02-26 15:41 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-06 2:49 ` Yan Yan
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 4/8] xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:43 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 5/8] xfrm: split xfrm_state_migrate into create and install functions Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:43 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 7/8] xfrm: add error messages to state migration Antony Antony
2026-01-30 12:14 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-26 15:43 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-26 16:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-02 14:06 ` Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:44 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 8/8] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration Antony Antony
2026-02-03 21:25 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-26 15:46 ` Antony Antony
2026-02-26 18:05 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-02 14:21 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-27 1:44 ` Yan Yan
2026-02-27 11:26 ` [devel-ipsec] " Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-27 23:14 ` Yan Yan
2026-03-08 14:42 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-10 11:09 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-10 16:52 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-14 0:32 ` Yan Yan
2026-04-07 13:29 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-05 7:51 ` Antony Antony [this message]
2026-01-27 10:50 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 6/8] xfrm: add state synchronization after migration Antony Antony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aak2BWlUbCCGbhp4@Antony2201.local \
--to=antony@phenome.org \
--cc=antony.antony@secunet.com \
--cc=chiachangwang@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@linux-ipsec.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=evitayan@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nharold@google.com \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.