All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Dragan Simic" <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:07:36 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aakPmB9-A0yS8qKM@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l3y3isas7rfe47uwk3bcvx4qpkpfen3j32omy6r4rxe6kn4kas@c4z5ydkervkm>

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 10:18:34AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Patches 3&4 can be squashed together, but the rest should be in separate patches
> as they target different drivers. If we were to revert any of these in the
> future, it becomes easy.

Ah, OK, Mani, thanks for the clarification.

Geraldo Nascimento

> 
> - Mani
> 
> -- 
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Dragan Simic" <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:07:36 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aakPmB9-A0yS8qKM@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l3y3isas7rfe47uwk3bcvx4qpkpfen3j32omy6r4rxe6kn4kas@c4z5ydkervkm>

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 10:18:34AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Patches 3&4 can be squashed together, but the rest should be in separate patches
> as they target different drivers. If we were to revert any of these in the
> future, it becomes easy.

Ah, OK, Mani, thanks for the clarification.

Geraldo Nascimento

> 
> - Mani
> 
> -- 
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-05  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-28  0:54 [PATCH v5 0/4] PCI: rockchip: 5.0 GT/s speed discouraged by Rockchip Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:54 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: rockchip-ep: do not attempt 5.0 GT/s retraining Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] PCI: rockchip-host: " Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  6:16   ` Dragan Simic
2026-02-28  6:16     ` Dragan Simic
2026-03-05  4:19     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-03-05  4:19       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-03-05  6:54       ` Dragan Simic
2026-03-05  6:54         ` Dragan Simic
2026-03-05  4:48     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-05  4:48       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-05  5:07       ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2026-03-05  5:07         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI: rockchip: drop 5.0 GT/s defines Geraldo Nascimento
2026-02-28  0:55   ` Geraldo Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aakPmB9-A0yS8qKM@geday \
    --to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.