Re: [PATCH 1/3] scalar: add --[no-]src option

[Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>]

On 8/14/2023 12:02 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

>> +--[no-]src::
>> +	Specify if the repository should be created within a `src` directory
>> +	within `<enlistment>`. This is the default behavior, so use
>> +	`--no-src` to opt-out of the creation of the `src` directory.
> 
> While there is nothing incorrect in the above per-se, and the first
> half of the description is perfectly good, but I find the latter
> half places too much stress on the existence of the "src" directory.
> As a mere mortal end-user, what is more important is not the
> presence of an extra directory, but the fact that everything I have
> is now moved one level down in the directory hierarchy to "src/"
> directory.
> 
> 	This is the default behavior; use `--no-src` to place the
> 	root of the working tree of the repository directly at
> 	`<enlistment>`.
> 
> or something along that line would have been easier to understand
> for me.  It is not the creation of `src`, but that everything is
> moved into it, is what some users may find unusual.

Your confusion makes sense. Focusing on the location of the cloned
repository is a good way to focus the option for the reader.
 
>> +test_expect_success '`scalar clone --no-src`' '
>> +	scalar clone --src "file://$(pwd)/to-clone" with-src &&
>> +	scalar clone --no-src "file://$(pwd)/to-clone" without-src &&
>> +
>> +	test_path_is_dir with-src/src &&
>> +	test_path_is_missing without-src/src
>> +'
> 
> And another thing that may be interesting, from the above point of
> view, is to compare these two:
> 
> 	(cd with-src/src && ls ?*) >with &&
> 	(cd without && ls ?*) >without &&
> 	test_cmp with without

Good idea.

Thanks,
-Stolee