Re: [PATCH 1/3] scalar: add --[no-]src option

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
>
> Some users have strong aversions to Scalar's opinion that the repository
> should be in a 'src' directory, even though it creates a clean slate for
> placing build outputs in adjacent directories.
>
> The --no-src option allows users to opt-out of the default behavior.
>
> While adding options, make sure the usage output by 'scalar clone -h'
> reports the same as the SYNOPSIS line in Documentation/scalar.txt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/scalar.txt |  8 +++++++-
>  scalar.c                 | 11 +++++++++--
>  t/t9211-scalar-clone.sh  |  8 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/scalar.txt b/Documentation/scalar.txt
> index f33436c7f65..cd65b3e230d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/scalar.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/scalar.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ scalar - A tool for managing large Git repositories
>  SYNOPSIS
>  --------
>  [verse]
> -scalar clone [--single-branch] [--branch <main-branch>] [--full-clone] <url> [<enlistment>]
> +scalar clone [--single-branch] [--branch <main-branch>] [--full-clone]
> +	[--[no-]src] <url> [<enlistment>]
>  scalar list
>  scalar register [<enlistment>]
>  scalar unregister [<enlistment>]
> @@ -80,6 +81,11 @@ remote-tracking branch for the branch this option was used for the initial
>  cloning. If the HEAD at the remote did not point at any branch when
>  `--single-branch` clone was made, no remote-tracking branch is created.
>  
> +--[no-]src::
> +	Specify if the repository should be created within a `src` directory
> +	within `<enlistment>`. This is the default behavior, so use
> +	`--no-src` to opt-out of the creation of the `src` directory.

While there is nothing incorrect in the above per-se, and the first
half of the description is perfectly good, but I find the latter
half places too much stress on the existence of the "src" directory.
As a mere mortal end-user, what is more important is not the
presence of an extra directory, but the fact that everything I have
is now moved one level down in the directory hierarchy to "src/"
directory.

	This is the default behavior; use `--no-src` to place the
	root of the working tree of the repository directly at
	`<enlistment>`.

or something along that line would have been easier to understand
for me.  It is not the creation of `src`, but that everything is
moved into it, is what some users may find unusual.

> +test_expect_success '`scalar clone --no-src`' '
> +	scalar clone --src "file://$(pwd)/to-clone" with-src &&
> +	scalar clone --no-src "file://$(pwd)/to-clone" without-src &&
> +
> +	test_path_is_dir with-src/src &&
> +	test_path_is_missing without-src/src
> +'

And another thing that may be interesting, from the above point of
view, is to compare these two:

	(cd with-src/src && ls ?*) >with &&
	(cd without && ls ?*) >without &&
	test_cmp with without

Both output should look something like

    cron.txt
    first.t
    second.t
    third.t

and the earlier confusion point I raised was that

	(cd with-src && ls ?*)

would not look like

    cron.txt
    first.t
    second.t
    src/
    third.t

Thanks.