All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
@ 2025-10-14 10:01 Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tao Chen @ 2025-10-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin,
	jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, song, ast, daniel,
	andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, sdf, haoluo
  Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf, Tao Chen

Background
==========
Alexei noted we should use preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain
in bpf stackmap.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com

A previous patch was submitted to attempt fixing this issue. And Andrii
suggested teach get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to
avoid that unnecessary copy.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250926153952.1661146-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev

Proposed Solution
=================
Add external perf_callchain_entry parameter for get_perf_callchain to
allow us to use external buffer from BPF side. The biggest advantage is
that it can reduce unnecessary copies.

Todo
====
If the above changes are reasonable, it seems that get_callchain_entry_for_task
could also use an external perf_callchain_entry.

But I'm not sure if this modification is appropriate. After all, the
implementation of get_callchain_entry in the perf subsystem seems much more
complex than directly using an external buffer.

Comments and suggestions are always welcome.

Change list:
 - v1 -> v2
   From Jiri
   - rebase code, fix confict
 - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251013174721.2681091-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev

Tao Chen (2):
  perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain
  bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain

 include/linux/perf_event.h |  4 ++--
 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c      | 19 +++++++++++--------
 kernel/events/callchain.c  | 13 +++++++++----
 kernel/events/core.c       |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.48.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 10:01 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
@ 2025-10-14 10:01 ` Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tao Chen @ 2025-10-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin,
	jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, song, ast, daniel,
	andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, sdf, haoluo
  Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf, Tao Chen

From bpf stack map, we want to use our own buffers to avoid unnecessary
copy, so let us pass it directly. BPF will use this in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  4 ++--
 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c      |  4 ++--
 kernel/events/callchain.c  | 13 +++++++++----
 kernel/events/core.c       |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index fd1d91017b9..b144da7d803 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1719,8 +1719,8 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, perf_callchain_entry);
 extern void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern struct perf_callchain_entry *
-get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
-		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
+get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_callchain_entry *external_entry,
+		   bool kernel, bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
 extern int get_callchain_buffers(int max_stack);
 extern void put_callchain_buffers(void);
 extern struct perf_callchain_entry *get_callchain_entry(int *rctx);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 4d53cdd1374..94e46b7f340 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
 		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
 
-	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
+	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
 				   false, false);
 
 	if (unlikely(!trace))
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
 	else if (kernel && task)
 		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
 	else
-		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
+		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
 					   crosstask, false);
 
 	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
index 808c0d7a31f..851e8f9d026 100644
--- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
+++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ static void fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(struct perf_callchain_entry *entr
 }
 
 struct perf_callchain_entry *
-get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
-		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
+get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_callchain_entry *external_entry,
+		   bool kernel, bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
 {
 	struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
 	struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
@@ -228,7 +228,11 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
 	if (crosstask && user && !kernel)
 		return NULL;
 
-	entry = get_callchain_entry(&rctx);
+	if (external_entry)
+		entry = external_entry;
+	else
+		entry = get_callchain_entry(&rctx);
+
 	if (!entry)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -260,7 +264,8 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
 	}
 
 exit_put:
-	put_callchain_entry(rctx);
+	if (!external_entry)
+		put_callchain_entry(rctx);
 
 	return entry;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7541f6f85fc..5d8e146003a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8217,7 +8217,7 @@ perf_callchain(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!kernel && !user)
 		return &__empty_callchain;
 
-	callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user,
+	callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user,
 				       max_stack, crosstask, true);
 	return callchain ?: &__empty_callchain;
 }
-- 
2.48.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 10:01 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
@ 2025-10-14 10:01 ` Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
                     ` (2 more replies)
  1 sibling, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tao Chen @ 2025-10-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin,
	jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, song, ast, daniel,
	andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, sdf, haoluo
  Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf, Tao Chen

As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
 	struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
 };
 
+struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
+	u64 nr;
+	u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
+};
+
 static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
@@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
 	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
 	bool kernel = !user;
+	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
 			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
@@ -314,12 +320,8 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
 		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
 
-	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
-				   false, false);
-
-	if (unlikely(!trace))
-		/* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
-		return -EFAULT;
+	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
+				   kernel, user, max_depth, false, false);
 
 	return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
 }
@@ -412,6 +414,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
 	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
 	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
 	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
+	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
 	bool kernel = !user;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	u64 *ips;
@@ -451,8 +454,8 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
 	else if (kernel && task)
 		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
 	else
-		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
-					   crosstask, false);
+		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
+					   kernel, user, max_depth, crosstask, false);
 
 	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
 		if (may_fault)
-- 
2.48.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
@ 2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
  2025-10-14 12:34     ` Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 15:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
  2025-10-16 11:59   ` kernel test robot
  2025-10-16 16:31   ` kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2025-10-14 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Chen
  Cc: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin,
	irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, song, ast, daniel, andrii,
	martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf,
	haoluo, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:01:28PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
> mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
> stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
>  	struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
>  };
>  
> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
> +	u64 nr;
> +	u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
> +};
> +
>  static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
> @@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
>  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>  	bool kernel = !user;
> +	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };

so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
you had in the previous version, right?

I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
entries are copied to map

jirka

>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
>  			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
> @@ -314,12 +320,8 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>  	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
>  		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>  
> -	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
> -				   false, false);
> -
> -	if (unlikely(!trace))
> -		/* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
> -		return -EFAULT;
> +	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
> +				   kernel, user, max_depth, false, false);
>  
>  	return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
>  }
> @@ -412,6 +414,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>  	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
>  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
>  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> +	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
>  	bool kernel = !user;
>  	int err = -EINVAL;
>  	u64 *ips;
> @@ -451,8 +454,8 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>  	else if (kernel && task)
>  		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
>  	else
> -		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
> -					   crosstask, false);
> +		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
> +					   kernel, user, max_depth, crosstask, false);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
>  		if (may_fault)
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2025-10-14 12:34     ` Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 15:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tao Chen @ 2025-10-14 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Olsa
  Cc: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin,
	irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, song, ast, daniel, andrii,
	martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf,
	haoluo, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf

在 2025/10/14 20:14, Jiri Olsa 写道:
>> +	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
> so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
> you had in the previous version, right?
> 

Yes, i think so, preempt_disable seems unnecessary.

> I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
> fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
> entries are copied to map

That makes sense. Removing it definitely looks better.

-- 
Best Regards
Tao Chen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
  2025-10-14 12:34     ` Tao Chen
@ 2025-10-14 15:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
  2025-10-16 20:39       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2025-10-14 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Tao Chen, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Ian Rogers,
	Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, Song Liu, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev,
	Hao Luo, linux-perf-use., LKML, bpf

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 5:14 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:01:28PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> > As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
> > if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
> > mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
> > stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
> >       struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
> >  };
> >
> > +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
> > +     u64 nr;
> > +     u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
> > +};
> > +
> >  static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> >  {
> >       return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
> > @@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
> >       bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
> >       struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> >       bool kernel = !user;
> > +     struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
>
> so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
> you had in the previous version, right?
>
> I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
> fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
> entries are copied to map

No. We're not adding 1k stack consumption.

pw-bot: cr

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2025-10-16 11:59   ` kernel test robot
  2025-10-16 16:31   ` kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-10-16 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Chen; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all

Hi Tao,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tao-Chen/perf-Use-extern-perf_callchain_entry-for-get_perf_callchain/20251014-181245
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251014100128.2721104-3-chen.dylane%40linux.dev
patch subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
config: sh-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510161955.CqDInkdX-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510161955.CqDInkdX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510161955.CqDInkdX-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:6:
   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c: In function 'bpf_get_stackid':
>> include/linux/filter.h:618:9: warning: the frame size of 1036 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
     618 |         }                                                                      \
         |         ^
   include/linux/filter.h:626:33: note: in expansion of macro 'BPF_CALL_x'
     626 | #define BPF_CALL_3(name, ...)   BPF_CALL_x(3, __NOATTR, name, __VA_ARGS__)
         |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:305:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BPF_CALL_3'
     305 | BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
         | ^~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c: In function '__bpf_get_stack':
>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:497:1: warning: the frame size of 1080 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
     497 | }
         | ^


vim +497 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c

d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  304  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23 @305  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  306  	   u64, flags)
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  307  {
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  308  	u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  309  	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  310  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  311  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  312  	bool kernel = !user;
8d90c803bbb115 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  313  	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  314  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  315  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  316  			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  317  		return -EINVAL;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  318  
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  319  	max_depth += skip;
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  320  	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  321  		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  322  
8d90c803bbb115 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  323  	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
8d90c803bbb115 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  324  				   kernel, user, max_depth, false, false);
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  325  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  326  	return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  327  }
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  328  
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  329  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  330  	.func		= bpf_get_stackid,
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  331  	.gpl_only	= true,
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  332  	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  333  	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  334  	.arg2_type	= ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  335  	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  336  };
d5a3b1f691865b Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  337  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  338  static __u64 count_kernel_ip(struct perf_callchain_entry *trace)
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  339  {
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  340  	__u64 nr_kernel = 0;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  341  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  342  	while (nr_kernel < trace->nr) {
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  343  		if (trace->ip[nr_kernel] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  344  			break;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  345  		nr_kernel++;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  346  	}
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  347  	return nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  348  }
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  349  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  350  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  351  	   struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags)
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  352  {
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  353  	struct perf_event *event = ctx->event;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  354  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  355  	bool kernel, user;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  356  	__u64 nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  357  	int ret;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  358  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  359  	/* perf_sample_data doesn't have callchain, use bpf_get_stackid */
16817ad7e8b317 Namhyung Kim       2022-09-08  360  	if (!(event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN))
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  361  		return bpf_get_stackid((unsigned long)(ctx->regs),
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  362  				       (unsigned long) map, flags, 0, 0);
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  363  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  364  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  365  			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  366  		return -EINVAL;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  367  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  368  	user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  369  	kernel = !user;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  370  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  371  	trace = ctx->data->callchain;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  372  	if (unlikely(!trace))
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  373  		return -EFAULT;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  374  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  375  	nr_kernel = count_kernel_ip(trace);
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  376  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  377  	if (kernel) {
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  378  		__u64 nr = trace->nr;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  379  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  380  		trace->nr = nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  381  		ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  382  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  383  		/* restore nr */
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  384  		trace->nr = nr;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  385  	} else { /* user */
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  386  		u64 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  387  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  388  		skip += nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  389  		if (skip > BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK)
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  390  			return -EFAULT;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  391  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  392  		flags = (flags & ~BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK) | skip;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  393  		ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  394  	}
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  395  	return ret;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  396  }
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  397  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  398  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto_pe = {
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  399  	.func		= bpf_get_stackid_pe,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  400  	.gpl_only	= false,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  401  	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  402  	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  403  	.arg2_type	= ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  404  	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  405  };
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  406  
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  407  static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  408  			    struct perf_callchain_entry *trace_in,
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  409  			    void *buf, u32 size, u64 flags, bool may_fault)
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  410  {
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  411  	u32 trace_nr, copy_len, elem_size, num_elem, max_depth;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  412  	bool user_build_id = flags & BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID;
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  413  	bool crosstask = task && task != current;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  414  	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  415  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  416  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
8d90c803bbb115 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  417  	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  418  	bool kernel = !user;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  419  	int err = -EINVAL;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  420  	u64 *ips;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  421  
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  422  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  423  			       BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID)))
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  424  		goto clear;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  425  	if (kernel && user_build_id)
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  426  		goto clear;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  427  
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  428  	elem_size = user_build_id ? sizeof(struct bpf_stack_build_id) : sizeof(u64);
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  429  	if (unlikely(size % elem_size))
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  430  		goto clear;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  431  
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  432  	/* cannot get valid user stack for task without user_mode regs */
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  433  	if (task && user && !user_mode(regs))
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  434  		goto err_fault;
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  435  
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  436  	/* get_perf_callchain does not support crosstask user stack walking
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  437  	 * but returns an empty stack instead of NULL.
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  438  	 */
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  439  	if (crosstask && user) {
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  440  		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  441  		goto clear;
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  442  	}
b8e3a87a627b57 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  443  
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  444  	num_elem = size / elem_size;
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  445  	max_depth = num_elem + skip;
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  446  	if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  447  		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  448  
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  449  	if (may_fault)
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  450  		rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  451  
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  452  	if (trace_in)
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  453  		trace = trace_in;
7b04d6d60fcfb5 Song Liu           2020-07-23  454  	else if (kernel && task)
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  455  		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
fa28dcb82a38f8 Song Liu           2020-06-29  456  	else
8d90c803bbb115 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  457  		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
8d90c803bbb115 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  458  					   kernel, user, max_depth, crosstask, false);
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  459  
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  460  	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  461  		if (may_fault)
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  462  			rcu_read_unlock();
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  463  		goto err_fault;
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  464  	}
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  465  
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  466  	trace_nr = trace->nr - skip;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  467  	trace_nr = (trace_nr <= num_elem) ? trace_nr : num_elem;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  468  	copy_len = trace_nr * elem_size;
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  469  
ee2a098851bfbe Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  470  	ips = trace->ip + skip;
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  471  	if (user_build_id) {
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  472  		struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs = buf;
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  473  		u32 i;
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  474  
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  475  		for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++)
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  476  			id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  477  	} else {
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  478  		memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
4f4c4fc0153fb1 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  479  	}
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  480  
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  481  	/* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  482  	if (may_fault)
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  483  		rcu_read_unlock();
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  484  
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  485  	if (user_build_id)
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  486  		stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
d4dd9775ec2424 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  487  
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  488  	if (size > copy_len)
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  489  		memset(buf + copy_len, 0, size - copy_len);
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  490  	return copy_len;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  491  
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  492  err_fault:
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  493  	err = -EFAULT;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  494  clear:
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  495  	memset(buf, 0, size);
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  496  	return err;
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28 @497  }
c195651e565ae7 Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  498  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
  2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
  2025-10-16 11:59   ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-10-16 16:31   ` kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-10-16 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Chen; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all

Hi Tao,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tao-Chen/perf-Use-extern-perf_callchain_entry-for-get_perf_callchain/20251014-181245
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251014100128.2721104-3-chen.dylane%40linux.dev
patch subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251017/202510170004.yEwSO5VB-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251017/202510170004.yEwSO5VB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510170004.yEwSO5VB-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:305:12: warning: stack frame size (1064) exceeds limit (1024) in 'bpf_get_stackid' [-Wframe-larger-than]
     305 | BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
         |            ^
>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:350:12: warning: stack frame size (1064) exceeds limit (1024) in 'bpf_get_stackid_pe' [-Wframe-larger-than]
     350 | BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
         |            ^
>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:407:13: warning: stack frame size (1120) exceeds limit (1024) in '__bpf_get_stack' [-Wframe-larger-than]
     407 | static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
         |             ^
   3 warnings generated.


vim +/bpf_get_stackid +305 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c

d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  304  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23 @305  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  306  	   u64, flags)
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  307  {
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  308  	u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  309  	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  310  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  311  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  312  	bool kernel = !user;
8d90c803bbb1151 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  313  	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  314  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  315  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  316  			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  317  		return -EINVAL;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  318  
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  319  	max_depth += skip;
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  320  	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  321  		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  322  
8d90c803bbb1151 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  323  	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
8d90c803bbb1151 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  324  				   kernel, user, max_depth, false, false);
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  325  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  326  	return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  327  }
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  328  
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  329  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  330  	.func		= bpf_get_stackid,
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  331  	.gpl_only	= true,
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  332  	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  333  	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  334  	.arg2_type	= ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  335  	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  336  };
d5a3b1f691865be Alexei Starovoitov 2016-02-17  337  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  338  static __u64 count_kernel_ip(struct perf_callchain_entry *trace)
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  339  {
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  340  	__u64 nr_kernel = 0;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  341  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  342  	while (nr_kernel < trace->nr) {
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  343  		if (trace->ip[nr_kernel] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  344  			break;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  345  		nr_kernel++;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  346  	}
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  347  	return nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  348  }
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  349  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23 @350  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  351  	   struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags)
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  352  {
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  353  	struct perf_event *event = ctx->event;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  354  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  355  	bool kernel, user;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  356  	__u64 nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  357  	int ret;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  358  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  359  	/* perf_sample_data doesn't have callchain, use bpf_get_stackid */
16817ad7e8b3172 Namhyung Kim       2022-09-08  360  	if (!(event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN))
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  361  		return bpf_get_stackid((unsigned long)(ctx->regs),
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  362  				       (unsigned long) map, flags, 0, 0);
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  363  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  364  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  365  			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  366  		return -EINVAL;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  367  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  368  	user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  369  	kernel = !user;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  370  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  371  	trace = ctx->data->callchain;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  372  	if (unlikely(!trace))
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  373  		return -EFAULT;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  374  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  375  	nr_kernel = count_kernel_ip(trace);
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  376  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  377  	if (kernel) {
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  378  		__u64 nr = trace->nr;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  379  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  380  		trace->nr = nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  381  		ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  382  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  383  		/* restore nr */
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  384  		trace->nr = nr;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  385  	} else { /* user */
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  386  		u64 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  387  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  388  		skip += nr_kernel;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  389  		if (skip > BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK)
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  390  			return -EFAULT;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  391  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  392  		flags = (flags & ~BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK) | skip;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  393  		ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  394  	}
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  395  	return ret;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  396  }
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  397  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  398  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto_pe = {
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  399  	.func		= bpf_get_stackid_pe,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  400  	.gpl_only	= false,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  401  	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  402  	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  403  	.arg2_type	= ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  404  	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  405  };
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  406  
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29 @407  static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  408  			    struct perf_callchain_entry *trace_in,
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  409  			    void *buf, u32 size, u64 flags, bool may_fault)
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  410  {
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  411  	u32 trace_nr, copy_len, elem_size, num_elem, max_depth;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  412  	bool user_build_id = flags & BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID;
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  413  	bool crosstask = task && task != current;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  414  	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  415  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  416  	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
8d90c803bbb1151 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  417  	struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  418  	bool kernel = !user;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  419  	int err = -EINVAL;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  420  	u64 *ips;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  421  
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  422  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  423  			       BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID)))
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  424  		goto clear;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  425  	if (kernel && user_build_id)
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  426  		goto clear;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  427  
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  428  	elem_size = user_build_id ? sizeof(struct bpf_stack_build_id) : sizeof(u64);
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  429  	if (unlikely(size % elem_size))
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  430  		goto clear;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  431  
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29  432  	/* cannot get valid user stack for task without user_mode regs */
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29  433  	if (task && user && !user_mode(regs))
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29  434  		goto err_fault;
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29  435  
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  436  	/* get_perf_callchain does not support crosstask user stack walking
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  437  	 * but returns an empty stack instead of NULL.
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  438  	 */
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  439  	if (crosstask && user) {
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  440  		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  441  		goto clear;
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  442  	}
b8e3a87a627b575 Jordan Rome        2023-11-08  443  
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  444  	num_elem = size / elem_size;
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  445  	max_depth = num_elem + skip;
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  446  	if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  447  		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29  448  
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  449  	if (may_fault)
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  450  		rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  451  
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  452  	if (trace_in)
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  453  		trace = trace_in;
7b04d6d60fcfb5b Song Liu           2020-07-23  454  	else if (kernel && task)
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  455  		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
fa28dcb82a38f8e Song Liu           2020-06-29  456  	else
8d90c803bbb1151 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  457  		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)&entry,
8d90c803bbb1151 Tao Chen           2025-10-14  458  					   kernel, user, max_depth, crosstask, false);
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  459  
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  460  	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  461  		if (may_fault)
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  462  			rcu_read_unlock();
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  463  		goto err_fault;
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  464  	}
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  465  
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  466  	trace_nr = trace->nr - skip;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  467  	trace_nr = (trace_nr <= num_elem) ? trace_nr : num_elem;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  468  	copy_len = trace_nr * elem_size;
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  469  
ee2a098851bfbe8 Namhyung Kim       2022-03-14  470  	ips = trace->ip + skip;
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  471  	if (user_build_id) {
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  472  		struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs = buf;
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  473  		u32 i;
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  474  
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  475  		for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++)
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  476  			id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  477  	} else {
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  478  		memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
4f4c4fc0153fb11 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  479  	}
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  480  
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  481  	/* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  482  	if (may_fault)
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  483  		rcu_read_unlock();
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  484  
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  485  	if (user_build_id)
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  486  		stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
d4dd9775ec24242 Andrii Nakryiko    2024-08-29  487  
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  488  	if (size > copy_len)
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  489  		memset(buf + copy_len, 0, size - copy_len);
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  490  	return copy_len;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  491  
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  492  err_fault:
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  493  	err = -EFAULT;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  494  clear:
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  495  	memset(buf, 0, size);
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  496  	return err;
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  497  }
c195651e565ae7f Yonghong Song      2018-04-28  498  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-14 15:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2025-10-16 20:39       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-10-18  7:51         ` Tao Chen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-16 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Jiri Olsa, Tao Chen, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang,
	Song Liu, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
	Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, linux-perf-use., LKML, bpf

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:02 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 5:14 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:01:28PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> > > As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
> > > if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
> > > mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
> > > stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > > index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
> > >       struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
> > > +     u64 nr;
> > > +     u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
> > > +};
> > > +

we shouldn't introduce another type, there is perf_callchain_entry in
linux/perf_event.h, what's the problem with using that?

> > >  static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> > >  {
> > >       return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
> > > @@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
> > >       bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
> > >       struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> > >       bool kernel = !user;
> > > +     struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
> >
> > so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
> > you had in the previous version, right?
> >
> > I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
> > fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
> > entries are copied to map
>
> No. We're not adding 1k stack consumption.

Right, and I thought we concluded as much last time, so it's a bit
surprising to see this in this patch.

Tao, you should go with 3 entries per CPU used in a stack-like
fashion. And then passing that entry into get_perf_callchain() (to
avoid one extra copy).

>
> pw-bot: cr

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-16 20:39       ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-18  7:51         ` Tao Chen
  2025-10-21 16:37           ` Andrii Nakryiko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tao Chen @ 2025-10-18  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko, Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Ian Rogers,
	Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, Song Liu, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev,
	Hao Luo, linux-perf-use., LKML, bpf

在 2025/10/17 04:39, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:02 AM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 5:14 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:01:28PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
>>>> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
>>>> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
>>>> mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
>>>> stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
>>>> ---
>>>>   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>> index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
>>>>        struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
>>>> +     u64 nr;
>>>> +     u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
> 
> we shouldn't introduce another type, there is perf_callchain_entry in
> linux/perf_event.h, what's the problem with using that?

perf_callchain_entry uses flexible array, DEFINE_PER_CPU seems do not
create buffer for this, for ease of use, the size of the ip array has 
been explicitly defined.

struct perf_callchain_entry {
         u64                             nr;
         u64                             ip[]; /* 
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack */
};

> 
>>>>   static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
>>>>   {
>>>>        return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
>>>> @@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>>>>        bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
>>>>        struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>>>>        bool kernel = !user;
>>>> +     struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
>>>
>>> so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
>>> you had in the previous version, right?
>>>
>>> I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
>>> fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
>>> entries are copied to map
>>
>> No. We're not adding 1k stack consumption.
> 
> Right, and I thought we concluded as much last time, so it's a bit
> surprising to see this in this patch.
> 

Ok, I feel like I'm missing some context from our previous exchange.

> Tao, you should go with 3 entries per CPU used in a stack-like
> fashion. And then passing that entry into get_perf_callchain() (to
> avoid one extra copy).
>

Got it. It is more clearer, will change it in v3.

>>
>> pw-bot: cr


-- 
Best Regards
Tao Chen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-18  7:51         ` Tao Chen
@ 2025-10-21 16:37           ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-10-23  6:11             ` Tao Chen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-21 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Chen
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang,
	Song Liu, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
	Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, linux-perf-use., LKML, bpf

On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 12:51 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> 在 2025/10/17 04:39, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:02 AM Alexei Starovoitov
> > <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 5:14 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:01:28PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> >>>> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
> >>>> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
> >>>> mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
> >>>> stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> >>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> >>>> index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> >>>> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
> >>>>        struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
> >>>>   };
> >>>>
> >>>> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
> >>>> +     u64 nr;
> >>>> +     u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >
> > we shouldn't introduce another type, there is perf_callchain_entry in
> > linux/perf_event.h, what's the problem with using that?
>
> perf_callchain_entry uses flexible array, DEFINE_PER_CPU seems do not
> create buffer for this, for ease of use, the size of the ip array has
> been explicitly defined.
>
> struct perf_callchain_entry {
>          u64                             nr;
>          u64                             ip[]; /*
> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack */
> };
>

Ok, fair enough, but instead of casting between perf_callchain_entry
and bpf_perf_callchain_entry, why not put perf_callchain_entry inside
bpf_perf_callchain_entry as a first struct and pass a pointer to it.
That looks a bit more appropriate? Though I'm not sure if compiler
will complain about that flex array...

But on related note, I looked briefly at how perf gets those
perf_callchain_entries, and it does seem like it also has a small
stack of entries, so maybe we don't really need to invent anything
here. See PERF_NR_CONTEXTS and how that's used.

If instead of disabling preemption we disable migration, then I think
we should be good with relying on perf's callchain management, or am I
missing something?

> >
> >>>>   static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> >>>>   {
> >>>>        return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
> >>>> @@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
> >>>>        bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
> >>>>        struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> >>>>        bool kernel = !user;
> >>>> +     struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
> >>>
> >>> so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
> >>> you had in the previous version, right?
> >>>
> >>> I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
> >>> fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
> >>> entries are copied to map
> >>
> >> No. We're not adding 1k stack consumption.
> >
> > Right, and I thought we concluded as much last time, so it's a bit
> > surprising to see this in this patch.
> >
>
> Ok, I feel like I'm missing some context from our previous exchange.
>
> > Tao, you should go with 3 entries per CPU used in a stack-like
> > fashion. And then passing that entry into get_perf_callchain() (to
> > avoid one extra copy).
> >
>
> Got it. It is more clearer, will change it in v3.
>
> >>
> >> pw-bot: cr
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Tao Chen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
  2025-10-21 16:37           ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-23  6:11             ` Tao Chen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tao Chen @ 2025-10-23  6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang,
	Song Liu, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
	Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, linux-perf-use., LKML, bpf

在 2025/10/22 00:37, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 12:51 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2025/10/17 04:39, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:02 AM Alexei Starovoitov
>>> <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 5:14 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:01:28PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
>>>>>> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
>>>>>> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
>>>>>> mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_perf_callchain_entries,
>>>>>> stack-allocated memory of bpf_perf_callchain_entry is used here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>>>>>    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>>>> index 94e46b7f340..acd72c021c0 100644
>>>>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
>>>>>>         struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
>>>>>>    };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
>>>>>> +     u64 nr;
>>>>>> +     u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>
>>> we shouldn't introduce another type, there is perf_callchain_entry in
>>> linux/perf_event.h, what's the problem with using that?
>>
>> perf_callchain_entry uses flexible array, DEFINE_PER_CPU seems do not
>> create buffer for this, for ease of use, the size of the ip array has
>> been explicitly defined.
>>
>> struct perf_callchain_entry {
>>           u64                             nr;
>>           u64                             ip[]; /*
>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack */
>> };
>>
> 
> Ok, fair enough, but instead of casting between perf_callchain_entry
> and bpf_perf_callchain_entry, why not put perf_callchain_entry inside
> bpf_perf_callchain_entry as a first struct and pass a pointer to it.
> That looks a bit more appropriate? Though I'm not sure if compiler
> will complain about that flex array...
> 
> But on related note, I looked briefly at how perf gets those
> perf_callchain_entries, and it does seem like it also has a small
> stack of entries, so maybe we don't really need to invent anything
> here. See PERF_NR_CONTEXTS and how that's used.
> 

It seems so. The implementation of get_callchain_entry and 
put_callchain_entry is similar to a simple stack management.

struct perf_callchain_entry *get_callchain_entry(int *rctx)
{
         int cpu;
         struct callchain_cpus_entries *entries;

         *rctx = get_recursion_context(this_cpu_ptr(callchain_recursion));
         if (*rctx == -1)
                 return NULL;

         entries = rcu_dereference(callchain_cpus_entries);
         if (!entries) {
  
put_recursion_context(this_cpu_ptr(callchain_recursion), *rctx);
                 return NULL;
         }

         cpu = smp_processor_id();

         return (((void *)entries->cpu_entries[cpu]) +
                 (*rctx * perf_callchain_entry__sizeof()));
}

void
put_callchain_entry(int rctx)
{
         put_recursion_context(this_cpu_ptr(callchain_recursion), rctx);
}

> If instead of disabling preemption we disable migration, then I think
> we should be good with relying on perf's callchain management, or am I
> missing something?
> 

Peter proposed refactoring the get_perf_callchain interface in v3, i 
think after that we can still use perf callchain, but with the 
refactored API, it can prevent being overwritten by preemption.

BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map
{
	...
	entry = bpf_get_perf_callchain;
	__bpf_get_stackid(map, entry, flags);
	bpf_put_callchain_entry(entry);
	...
}

A simple specific implementation is as follows:

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index fd1d91017b9..1c7573f085f 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx {
  	u32				nr;
  	short				contexts;
  	bool				contexts_maxed;
+	bool				add_mark;
  };

  typedef unsigned long (*perf_copy_f)(void *dst, const void *src,
@@ -1718,9 +1719,18 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, 
perf_callchain_entry);

  extern void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx 
*entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
  extern void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx 
*entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
+
+extern void __init_perf_callchain_ctx(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx,
+				      struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
+				      u32 max_stack, bool add_mark);
+
+extern void __get_perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx 
*ctx, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern void __get_perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx 
*ctx, struct pt_regs *regs);
+
+
  extern struct perf_callchain_entry *
  get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
-		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
+		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask);
  extern int get_callchain_buffers(int max_stack);
  extern void put_callchain_buffers(void);
  extern struct perf_callchain_entry *get_callchain_entry(int *rctx);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 4d53cdd1374..3f2543e5244 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -297,14 +297,38 @@ static long __bpf_get_stackid(struct bpf_map *map,
  	return id;
  }

+static struct perf_callchain_entry *entry
+bpf_get_perf_callchain(int *rctx, struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, 
bool user, int max_stack)
+{
+	struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
+	struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
+
+	entry = get_callchain_entry(&rctx);
+	if (unlikely(!entry))
+		return NULL;
+
+	__init_perf_callchain_ctx(&ctx, entry)
+	if (kernel)
+		__get_perf_callchain_kernel(&ctx, regs);
+	if (user)
+		__get_perf_callchain_user(&ctx, regs);
+	return entry;
+}
+
+static bpf_put_perf_callchain(int rctx)
+{
+	put_callchain_entry(rctx);
+}
+
  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
  	   u64, flags)
  {
  	u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
  	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
  	bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
-	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
+	struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
  	bool kernel = !user;
+	int rctx, ret;

  	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
  			       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
@@ -314,14 +338,14 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, 
regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
  	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
  		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;

-	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
-				   false, false);
-
-	if (unlikely(!trace))
-		/* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
+	entry = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&rctx, regs, kernel, user, max_depth);
+	if (unlikely(!entry))
  		return -EFAULT;

-	return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
+	ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, entry, flags);
+	bpf_put_callchain_entry(rctx);
+
+	return ret;
  }

  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
@@ -452,7 +476,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, 
struct task_struct *task,
  		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
  	else
  		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
-					   crosstask, false);
+					   crosstask);

  	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
  		if (may_fault)
diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
index 808c0d7a31f..2c36e490625 100644
--- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
+++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
@@ -216,13 +216,54 @@ static void 
fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(struct perf_callchain_entry *entr
  #endif
  }

+void __init_perf_callchain_ctx(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx,
+			       struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
+			       u32 max_stack, bool add_mark)
+
+{
+	ctx->entry		= entry;
+	ctx->max_stack		= max_stack;
+	ctx->nr			= entry->nr = 0;
+	ctx->contexts		= 0;
+	ctx->contexts_maxed	= false;
+	ctx->add_mark		= add_mark;
+}
+
+void __get_perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx, 
struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (user_mode(regs))
+		return;
+
+	if (ctx->add_mark)
+		perf_callchain_store_context(ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_KERNEL);
+	perf_callchain_kernel(ctx, regs);
+}
+
+void __get_perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx, 
struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int start_entry_idx;
+
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+		if (current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_USER_WORKER))
+			return;
+		regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+	}
+
+	if (ctx->add_mark)
+		perf_callchain_store_context(ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_USER);
+
+	start_entry_idx = ctx->nr;
+	perf_callchain_user(ctx, regs);
+	fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(ctx->entry, start_entry_idx);
+}
+
  struct perf_callchain_entry *
  get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
-		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
+		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask)
  {
  	struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
  	struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
-	int rctx, start_entry_idx;
+	int rctx;

  	/* crosstask is not supported for user stacks */
  	if (crosstask && user && !kernel)
@@ -232,34 +273,14 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool 
kernel, bool user,
  	if (!entry)
  		return NULL;

-	ctx.entry		= entry;
-	ctx.max_stack		= max_stack;
-	ctx.nr			= entry->nr = 0;
-	ctx.contexts		= 0;
-	ctx.contexts_maxed	= false;
+	__init_perf_callchain_ctx(&ctx, entry, max_stack, true);

-	if (kernel && !user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (add_mark)
-			perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_KERNEL);
-		perf_callchain_kernel(&ctx, regs);
-	}
-
-	if (user && !crosstask) {
-		if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-			if (current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_USER_WORKER))
-				goto exit_put;
-			regs = task_pt_regs(current);
-		}
+	if (kernel)
+		__get_perf_callchain_kernel(&ctx, regs);

-		if (add_mark)
-			perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_USER);
-
-		start_entry_idx = entry->nr;
-		perf_callchain_user(&ctx, regs);
-		fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(entry, start_entry_idx);
-	}
+	if (user && !crosstask)
+		__get_perf_callchain_user(&ctx, regs);

-exit_put:
  	put_callchain_entry(rctx);

  	return entry;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7541f6f85fc..eb0f110593d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8218,7 +8218,7 @@ perf_callchain(struct perf_event *event, struct 
pt_regs *regs)
  		return &__empty_callchain;

  	callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user,
-				       max_stack, crosstask, true);
+				       max_stack, crosstask);
  	return callchain ?: &__empty_callchain;
  }

>>>
>>>>>>    static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>>         return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
>>>>>> @@ -305,6 +310,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>>>>>>         bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
>>>>>>         struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>>>>>>         bool kernel = !user;
>>>>>> +     struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry entry = { 0 };
>>>>>
>>>>> so IIUC having entries on stack we do not need to do preempt_disable
>>>>> you had in the previous version, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw Andrii's justification to have this on the stack, I think it's
>>>>> fine, but does it have to be initialized? it seems that only used
>>>>> entries are copied to map
>>>>
>>>> No. We're not adding 1k stack consumption.
>>>
>>> Right, and I thought we concluded as much last time, so it's a bit
>>> surprising to see this in this patch.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I feel like I'm missing some context from our previous exchange.
>>
>>> Tao, you should go with 3 entries per CPU used in a stack-like
>>> fashion. And then passing that entry into get_perf_callchain() (to
>>> avoid one extra copy).
>>>
>>
>> Got it. It is more clearer, will change it in v3.
>>
>>>>
>>>> pw-bot: cr
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Tao Chen


-- 
Best Regards
Tao Chen

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-23  6:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-14 10:01 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-14 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-14 12:14   ` Jiri Olsa
2025-10-14 12:34     ` Tao Chen
2025-10-14 15:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-16 20:39       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-18  7:51         ` Tao Chen
2025-10-21 16:37           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-23  6:11             ` Tao Chen
2025-10-16 11:59   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-16 16:31   ` kernel test robot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.