Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] selftests: drv-net: add netkit devmem RX test

[Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 07:59:57AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 03/17, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 05:08:20PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > On 03/16, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Add tests for devmem RX over a netkit device with a leased queue. This
> > > > is the same as the other devmem RX test except for ncdevmem executes in
> > > > a namespace, binds to a netkit, and skips the ethtool NIC configuration
> > > > steps (relying on the test runner for that setup).
> > > > 
> > > > The RX path is setup as the following:
> > > > 
> > > >  RX Path
> > > >  -------
> > > > 
> > > >  Remote            Physical NIC          Netkit Host        Netkit Guest (netns)
> > > >    |                    |                     |                    |
> > > >    |--- TCP send ------>|                     |                    |
> > > >                         |-------------------->|                    |
> > > >                       dmabuf                  |--- BPF redirect -->|
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Is it too messy to parametrize the existing test to run both with and
> > > without the namespaces? Feels like should be somewhat doable in python?
> > 
> > IIUC, we could have main() do something like:
> > 
> > for env [NetDrvContEnv, NetDrvEpEnv]:
> >     with env as cfg:
> >         [...]
> >         ksft_run(tests, args=(cfg,))
> > 
> > 
> > And then the tests could call helpers that check cfg.netns to use the
> > nk_{guest,host}_ip6 addresses when true, otherwise use the regular
> > addresses?
> > 
> > It should be doable if I'm following your drift.
> 
> Yeah, yeah, this plus some small changes here and there (to pass your
> new -n in the netns mode for example).

Sounds good, I'll give it a look.