Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] phy: qcom: qmp-pcie: Add Gen5 8-lanes mode for Glymur

From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	 Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	 devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] phy: qcom: qmp-pcie: Add Gen5 8-lanes mode for Glymur
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 09:41:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac0ubhTTsUNKHD__@baldur> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acua8Me0zo3v/CBi@hu-qianyu-lv.qualcomm.com>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 02:59:12AM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:23:19PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 12:15:31AM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > > The third PCIe controller on Glymur SoC supports 8-lane operation via
> > > bifurcation of two PHYs (each requires separate power domian, resets and
> > > aux clk).
> > > 
> > > Add dedicated reset/no_csr reset list ("phy_b", "phy_b_nocsr") and
> > > clock ("phy_b_aux") required for 8-lane operation. Introduce new
> > > glymur_qmp_gen5x8_pciephy_cfg configuration to enable PCIe Gen5 x8 mode.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > @@ -4705,6 +4713,23 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg glymur_qmp_gen4x2_pciephy_cfg = {
> > >  	.phy_status		= PHYSTATUS_4_20,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +static const struct qmp_phy_cfg glymur_qmp_gen5x8_pciephy_cfg = {
> > > +	.lanes = 8,
> > > +
> > > +	.offsets		= &qmp_pcie_offsets_v8_50,
> > > +
> > > +	.reset_list		= glymur_pciephy_reset_l,
> > > +	.num_resets		= ARRAY_SIZE(glymur_pciephy_reset_l),
> > > +	.nocsr_reset_list	= glymur_pciephy_nocsr_reset_l,
> > > +	.num_nocsr_resets	= ARRAY_SIZE(glymur_pciephy_nocsr_reset_l),
> > 
> > Just for my understanding. If it was not the NOCSR case and had to
> > program the registers, would we have needed to program anything in the
> > PCIe3B space?
> 
> The PCIe3B PHY registers need to be programmed.

Why?

Regards,
Bjorn

> But we don't need to do it explicitly because there are also broadcast
> registers: writing to these registers will automatically write the same
> offset and value to both PHY ports simultaneously.
> 
> - Qiang Yu
> > 
> > > +	.vreg_list		= qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> > > +	.num_vregs		= ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
> > > +
> > > +	.regs			= pciephy_v8_50_regs_layout,
> > > +
> > > +	.phy_status		= PHYSTATUS_4_20,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static void qmp_pcie_init_port_b(struct qmp_pcie *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg_tbls *tbls)
> > >  {
> > >  	const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
> > > @@ -5483,6 +5508,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id qmp_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> > >  	}, {
> > >  		.compatible = "qcom,glymur-qmp-gen5x4-pcie-phy",
> > >  		.data = &glymur_qmp_gen5x4_pciephy_cfg,
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.compatible = "qcom,glymur-qmp-gen5x8-pcie-phy",
> > > +		.data = &glymur_qmp_gen5x8_pciephy_cfg,
> > >  	}, {
> > >  		.compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy",
> > >  		.data = &ipq6018_pciephy_cfg,
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry