All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,  will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	kernel@xen0n.name, maddy@linux.ibm.com,  mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
	 palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
	tglx@kernel.org,  mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,  robh@kernel.org,
	saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com,
	 vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org,  feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com,
	 kees@kernel.org, elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	lirongqing@baidu.com,  safinaskar@gmail.com, rppt@kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, jbohac@suse.cz,  cfsworks@gmail.com,
	osandov@fb.com, tangyouling@kylinos.cn,
	 sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	eajames@linux.ibm.com,  songshuaishuai@tinylab.org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	 vishal.moola@gmail.com, junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech,
	coxu@redhat.com, liaoyuanhong@vivo.com,
	 fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,  kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:42:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acFtMLyCWbYOyFZT@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5694ee0-7a95-4c15-6775-990d70c8d77b@huawei.com>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 07:17:21PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026/3/23 18:20, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> >> Commit 35c18f2933c5 ("Add a new optional ",cma" suffix to the
> >> crashkernel= command line option") and commit ab475510e042 ("kdump:
> >> implement reserve_crashkernel_cma") added CMA support for kdump
> >> crashkernel reservation.
> >>
> >> Crash kernel memory reservation wastes production resources if too
> >> large, risks kdump failure if too small, and faces allocation difficulties
> >> on fragmented systems due to contiguous block constraints. The new
> >> CMA-based crashkernel reservation scheme splits the "large fixed
> >> reservation" into a "small fixed region + large CMA dynamic region": the
> >> CMA memory is available to userspace during normal operation to avoid
> >> waste, and is reclaimed for kdump upon crash—saving memory while
> >> improving reliability.
> >>
> >> So extend crashkernel CMA reservation support to arm64. The following
> >> changes are made to enable CMA reservation:
> >>
> >> - Parse and obtain the CMA reservation size along with other crashkernel
> >>   parameters.
> >> - Call reserve_crashkernel_cma() to allocate the CMA region for kdump.
> >> - Include the CMA-reserved ranges for kdump kernel to use.
> >> - Exclude the CMA-reserved ranges from the crash kernel memory to
> >>   prevent them from being exported through /proc/vmcore, which is already
> >>   done in the crash core.
> >>
> >> Update kernel-parameters.txt to document CMA support for crashkernel on
> >> arm64 architecture.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> >> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> >> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> >> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> v7:
> >> - Correct the inclusion of CMA-reserved ranges for kdump
> >>   kernel in of/kexec.
> >> v3:
> >> - Add Acked-by.
> >> v2:
> >> - Free cmem in prepare_elf_headers()
> >> - Add the mtivation.
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c          | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c                            | 5 +++--
> >>  drivers/of/fdt.c                                | 9 +++++----
> >>  drivers/of/kexec.c                              | 9 +++++++++
> >>  5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> index cb850e5290c2..afb3112510f7 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ Kernel parameters
> >>  			It will be ignored when crashkernel=X,high is not used
> >>  			or memory reserved is below 4G.
> >>  	crashkernel=size[KMG],cma
> >> -			[KNL, X86, ppc] Reserve additional crash kernel memory from
> >> +			[KNL, X86, ARM64, PPC] Reserve additional crash kernel memory from
> >>  			CMA. This reservation is usable by the first system's
> >>  			userspace memory and kernel movable allocations (memory
> >>  			balloon, zswap). Pages allocated from this memory range
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> >> index c338506a580b..cc577d77df00 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> >>  unsigned int arch_get_system_nr_ranges(void)
> >>  {
> >> -	unsigned int nr_ranges = 2; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
> >> +	unsigned int nr_ranges = 2 + crashk_cma_cnt; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
> > 
> > You update arch_get_system_nr_ranges() to account for CMA ranges, but
> > prepare_elf_headers() in the same file (line 51) still has the
> > hardcoded:
> > 
> >         nr_ranges = 2; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
> 
> I don't see any logic related to prepare_elf_headers() or hardcoded
> nr_ranges = 2 in the arm64 implementation.

Just ignore me here, I've mis applied the patch, and then I got
arch_get_system_nr_ranges() and prepare_elf_headers(), but, they are the
same thing at in here.

> > 
> > and does not exclude CMA ranges from cmem. If the generic crash core
> > handles CMA exclusion from vmcore, then shouldn't
> > arch_get_system_nr_ranges() also not need this change?
> > 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,  will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	kernel@xen0n.name, maddy@linux.ibm.com,  mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
	 palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
	tglx@kernel.org,  mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,  robh@kernel.org,
	saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com,
	 vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org,  feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com,
	 kees@kernel.org, elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	lirongqing@baidu.com,  safinaskar@gmail.com, rppt@kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, jbohac@suse.cz,  cfsworks@gmail.com,
	osandov@fb.com, tangyouling@kylinos.cn,
	 sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	eajames@linux.ibm.com,  songshuaishuai@tinylab.org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	 vishal.moola@gmail.com, junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech,
	coxu@redhat.com, liaoyuanhong@vivo.com,
	 fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,  kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:42:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acFtMLyCWbYOyFZT@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5694ee0-7a95-4c15-6775-990d70c8d77b@huawei.com>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 07:17:21PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026/3/23 18:20, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> >> Commit 35c18f2933c5 ("Add a new optional ",cma" suffix to the
> >> crashkernel= command line option") and commit ab475510e042 ("kdump:
> >> implement reserve_crashkernel_cma") added CMA support for kdump
> >> crashkernel reservation.
> >>
> >> Crash kernel memory reservation wastes production resources if too
> >> large, risks kdump failure if too small, and faces allocation difficulties
> >> on fragmented systems due to contiguous block constraints. The new
> >> CMA-based crashkernel reservation scheme splits the "large fixed
> >> reservation" into a "small fixed region + large CMA dynamic region": the
> >> CMA memory is available to userspace during normal operation to avoid
> >> waste, and is reclaimed for kdump upon crash—saving memory while
> >> improving reliability.
> >>
> >> So extend crashkernel CMA reservation support to arm64. The following
> >> changes are made to enable CMA reservation:
> >>
> >> - Parse and obtain the CMA reservation size along with other crashkernel
> >>   parameters.
> >> - Call reserve_crashkernel_cma() to allocate the CMA region for kdump.
> >> - Include the CMA-reserved ranges for kdump kernel to use.
> >> - Exclude the CMA-reserved ranges from the crash kernel memory to
> >>   prevent them from being exported through /proc/vmcore, which is already
> >>   done in the crash core.
> >>
> >> Update kernel-parameters.txt to document CMA support for crashkernel on
> >> arm64 architecture.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> >> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> >> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> >> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> v7:
> >> - Correct the inclusion of CMA-reserved ranges for kdump
> >>   kernel in of/kexec.
> >> v3:
> >> - Add Acked-by.
> >> v2:
> >> - Free cmem in prepare_elf_headers()
> >> - Add the mtivation.
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c          | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c                            | 5 +++--
> >>  drivers/of/fdt.c                                | 9 +++++----
> >>  drivers/of/kexec.c                              | 9 +++++++++
> >>  5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> index cb850e5290c2..afb3112510f7 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ Kernel parameters
> >>  			It will be ignored when crashkernel=X,high is not used
> >>  			or memory reserved is below 4G.
> >>  	crashkernel=size[KMG],cma
> >> -			[KNL, X86, ppc] Reserve additional crash kernel memory from
> >> +			[KNL, X86, ARM64, PPC] Reserve additional crash kernel memory from
> >>  			CMA. This reservation is usable by the first system's
> >>  			userspace memory and kernel movable allocations (memory
> >>  			balloon, zswap). Pages allocated from this memory range
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> >> index c338506a580b..cc577d77df00 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> >>  unsigned int arch_get_system_nr_ranges(void)
> >>  {
> >> -	unsigned int nr_ranges = 2; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
> >> +	unsigned int nr_ranges = 2 + crashk_cma_cnt; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
> > 
> > You update arch_get_system_nr_ranges() to account for CMA ranges, but
> > prepare_elf_headers() in the same file (line 51) still has the
> > hardcoded:
> > 
> >         nr_ranges = 2; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
> 
> I don't see any logic related to prepare_elf_headers() or hardcoded
> nr_ranges = 2 in the arm64 implementation.

Just ignore me here, I've mis applied the patch, and then I got
arch_get_system_nr_ranges() and prepare_elf_headers(), but, they are the
same thing at in here.

> > 
> > and does not exclude CMA ranges from cmem. If the generic crash core
> > handles CMA exclusion from vmcore, then shouldn't
> > arch_get_system_nr_ranges() also not need this change?
> > 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-02 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-23  7:27 [PATCH v9 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] powerpc/crash: sort crash memory ranges before preparing elfcorehdr Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] crash: Exclude crash kernel memory in crash core Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] crash: Use crash_exclude_core_ranges() on powerpc Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23 10:20   ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-23 10:20     ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-23 11:17     ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23 11:17       ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23 16:42       ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-03-23 16:42         ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-23  7:27 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] riscv: " Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23  7:27   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-23 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 0/5] arm64/riscv: " Andrew Morton
2026-03-23 16:55   ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-24  4:02   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-24  4:02     ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-24  4:29     ` Sourabh Jain
2026-03-24  4:29       ` Sourabh Jain
2026-03-24  6:14       ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-24  6:14         ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-03-24  6:35 ` Askar Safin
2026-03-24  6:35   ` Askar Safin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acFtMLyCWbYOyFZT@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liaoyuanhong@vivo.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=safinaskar@gmail.com \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=songshuaishuai@tinylab.org \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.