All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Bozeman <daniel@orb.net>
To: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	heiko@sntech.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pmdomain/rockchip: skip QoS operations for idle-only domains
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 06:13:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acy3eP0dZBx6A950@claude-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc6f00fa-10b0-44c8-d8b4-694f8ff3b9ea@rock-chips.com>

<fc6f00fa-10b0-44c8-d8b4-694f8ff3b9ea@rock-chips.com>

I ran additional tests to gather evidence:

Test 1: Patch 2 only (skip EPROBE_DEFER), no patch 1.
Result: kernel panic. The idle-only domains register
successfully, but genpd_power_off_work_fn attempts to power
them off and crashes in rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request:

  Internal error: synchronous external abort: 0000000096000010
  CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:3
  Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
  pc : regmap_mmio_read32le+0x8/0x20
  Call trace:
   regmap_mmio_read32le+0x8/0x20
   _regmap_bus_reg_read+0x6c/0xac
   _regmap_read+0x60/0xd8
   regmap_read+0x4c/0x7c
   rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request.isra.0+0x94/0x1b4
   rockchip_pd_power+0x378/0x604
   rockchip_pd_power_off+0x14/0x34
   genpd_power_off.isra.0+0x1f0/0x2f0
   genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x34/0x54

Test 2: No kernel patches, PD_GPU disabled via
status = "disabled" in DTS to avoid EPROBE_DEFER entirely.
Result: same kernel panic. The idle-only domains register
but crash identically when genpd tries to power them off.
Same call trace as above.

So the crash is not caused by probe ordering or
EPROBE_DEFER -- it happens whenever idle-only domains
(pwr_mask == 0) are registered and genpd attempts to
power them off. The QoS register access in
rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request faults on these domains.

Regarding S2R: you raise a valid concern about skipping
QoS save/restore. However, these idle-only domains cannot
actually be powered off (pwr_mask == 0), so
rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain already returns early for
them. The QoS save/idle/restore cycle in rockchip_pd_power
has no effect on these domains since the power state never
changes -- the save and restore are paired around a no-op.
Skipping the entire sequence for pwr_mask == 0 should be
safe for S2R as well.

Both patches are needed:
- Patch 1: prevents the QoS crash on idle-only domains
- Patch 2: prevents probe teardown from making things worse

Tested on NanoPi Zero2 (RK3528) with all four scenarios:
both patches (boots), patch 2 only (panic), DTS workaround
(panic), both patches + E20C regression test (no issues).

The board DTS that triggers this (GPIO-controlled USB VBUS
regulator on GPIO4/PD_RKVENC) can be seen at:
https://github.com/dboze/openwrt/blob/add-nanopi-zero2-clean/target/linux/rockchip/patches-6.12/102-arm64-dts-rockchip-Add-FriendlyElec-NanoPi-Zero2.patch


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Bozeman <daniel@orb.net>
To: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	heiko@sntech.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pmdomain/rockchip: skip QoS operations for idle-only domains
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 06:13:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acy3eP0dZBx6A950@claude-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc6f00fa-10b0-44c8-d8b4-694f8ff3b9ea@rock-chips.com>

<fc6f00fa-10b0-44c8-d8b4-694f8ff3b9ea@rock-chips.com>

I ran additional tests to gather evidence:

Test 1: Patch 2 only (skip EPROBE_DEFER), no patch 1.
Result: kernel panic. The idle-only domains register
successfully, but genpd_power_off_work_fn attempts to power
them off and crashes in rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request:

  Internal error: synchronous external abort: 0000000096000010
  CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:3
  Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
  pc : regmap_mmio_read32le+0x8/0x20
  Call trace:
   regmap_mmio_read32le+0x8/0x20
   _regmap_bus_reg_read+0x6c/0xac
   _regmap_read+0x60/0xd8
   regmap_read+0x4c/0x7c
   rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request.isra.0+0x94/0x1b4
   rockchip_pd_power+0x378/0x604
   rockchip_pd_power_off+0x14/0x34
   genpd_power_off.isra.0+0x1f0/0x2f0
   genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x34/0x54

Test 2: No kernel patches, PD_GPU disabled via
status = "disabled" in DTS to avoid EPROBE_DEFER entirely.
Result: same kernel panic. The idle-only domains register
but crash identically when genpd tries to power them off.
Same call trace as above.

So the crash is not caused by probe ordering or
EPROBE_DEFER -- it happens whenever idle-only domains
(pwr_mask == 0) are registered and genpd attempts to
power them off. The QoS register access in
rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request faults on these domains.

Regarding S2R: you raise a valid concern about skipping
QoS save/restore. However, these idle-only domains cannot
actually be powered off (pwr_mask == 0), so
rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain already returns early for
them. The QoS save/idle/restore cycle in rockchip_pd_power
has no effect on these domains since the power state never
changes -- the save and restore are paired around a no-op.
Skipping the entire sequence for pwr_mask == 0 should be
safe for S2R as well.

Both patches are needed:
- Patch 1: prevents the QoS crash on idle-only domains
- Patch 2: prevents probe teardown from making things worse

Tested on NanoPi Zero2 (RK3528) with all four scenarios:
both patches (boots), patch 2 only (panic), DTS workaround
(panic), both patches + E20C regression test (no issues).

The board DTS that triggers this (GPIO-controlled USB VBUS
regulator on GPIO4/PD_RKVENC) can be seen at:
https://github.com/dboze/openwrt/blob/add-nanopi-zero2-clean/target/linux/rockchip/patches-6.12/102-arm64-dts-rockchip-Add-FriendlyElec-NanoPi-Zero2.patch

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 18:02 [PATCH 1/2] pmdomain/rockchip: skip QoS operations for idle-only domains Daniel Bozeman
2026-03-31 18:02 ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-03-31 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain/rockchip: skip domains returning -EPROBE_DEFER Daniel Bozeman
2026-03-31 18:02   ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-01  1:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] pmdomain/rockchip: skip QoS operations for idle-only domains Shawn Lin
2026-04-01  1:17   ` Shawn Lin
     [not found]   ` <CAG+Ngm+xJCCQMPddZx8AbPEeH3rUrn3GKF575zXpGPJrnELvMw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-04-01  2:54     ` Shawn Lin
2026-04-01  2:54       ` Shawn Lin
2026-04-01  6:13       ` Daniel Bozeman [this message]
2026-04-01  6:13         ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-01  7:11         ` Shawn Lin
2026-04-01  7:11           ` Shawn Lin
2026-04-03 21:27           ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-03 21:27             ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-04 11:40             ` Shawn Lin
2026-04-04 11:40               ` Shawn Lin
2026-04-04 22:42               ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-04 22:42                 ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-05 23:29               ` Jonas Karlman
2026-04-05 23:29                 ` Jonas Karlman
2026-04-06 23:55                 ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-06 23:55                   ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-28  1:32                   ` Daniel Bozeman
2026-04-28  1:32                     ` Daniel Bozeman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-01  2:52 Daniel Bozeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acy3eP0dZBx6A950@claude-dev \
    --to=daniel@orb.net \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.