All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Szapar-Mudlaw, Martyna" <martyna.szapar-mudlaw@linux.intel.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ice: refactor the Tx scheduler feature
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:30:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad9799ed-5313-4787-b982-c8fc82a281a2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5e34397-0b81-4132-86d0-498a111cc363@linux.intel.com>



On 3/4/2025 2:43 PM, Szapar-Mudlaw, Martyna wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/3/2025 10:54 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:33:56PM +0100, Mateusz Polchlopek wrote:
>>> Embed ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel() inside the only caller:
>>> ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get().
>>> Instead of jump from the wrapper to the function that does "get" 
>>> operation
>>> it does "get" itself.
>>>
>>> Remove unnecessary comment and make usage of str_enabled_disabled()
>>> in ice_init_tx_topology().
>>
>> Hi Mateusz,
>>
>> These changes seem reasonable to me.
>> But I wonder if they could be motivated in the commit message.
>>
>> What I mean is, the commit message explains what has been done.
>> But I think it should explain why it has been done.
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> I'm replying on behalf of Mateusz since he's on leave, and we didn't 
> want to keep this issue waiting too long.
> Would such extended commit message make sense and address your concerns?
> 
> "Simplify the code by eliminating an unnecessary wrapper function. 
> Previously, ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get() acted as a thin wrapper 
> around ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel(), adding no real value but increasing 
> code complexity. Since both functions were only used once, the wrapper 
> was redundant and contributed approximately 20 lines of unnecessary 
> code. By directly calling ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel(), improve 
> readability and reduce function jumps, without altering functionality.
> Also remove unnecessary comment and make usage of str_enabled_disabled() 
> in ice_init_tx_topology()."
> 
> Thank you,
> Martyna

Sorry, I caused some confusion in the previous version of proposed 
commit message. Here’s the corrected one:

"Simplify the code by eliminating an unnecessary wrapper function. 
Previously, ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get() acted as a thin wrapper 
around ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel(), adding no real value but increasing 
code complexity. Since both functions were only used once, the wrapper 
was redundant and contributed approximately 20 lines of unnecessary 
code. Remove ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel() and moves its instructions 
directly into ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get(), improving readability 
and reducing function jumps, without altering functionality.
Also remove unnecessary comment and make usage of str_enabled_disabled() 
in ice_init_tx_topology()."

> 
>>
>>> Suggested-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
>>
>> ...
>>
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26 11:33 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ice: refactor the Tx scheduler feature Mateusz Polchlopek
2025-03-03  9:54 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-04 13:43   ` Szapar-Mudlaw, Martyna
2025-03-05 13:30     ` Szapar-Mudlaw, Martyna [this message]
2025-03-06 17:54       ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad9799ed-5313-4787-b982-c8fc82a281a2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=martyna.szapar-mudlaw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.