From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
sophgo@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Devicetree spec: Specifying /cpus/cpu@* unit address format?
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 14:43:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adHofcKAr7C5YCSA@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00ddad5a-02f5-474e-af9c-11ce7716ddfc@iscas.ac.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 910 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 06:06:17PM +0800, Vivian Wang wrote:
> (Also posted at: https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/issues/86 )
>
> Hi all,
>
> Presently, there seems to be some confusion in the community about the
> format of unit addresses for "/cpus/cpu@*" nodes for a CPU with ID > 9, e.g.
>
> cpu@??? {
> reg = <10>;
> /* reg = <0xa>; */ /* This should be equivalent */
> }
>
>
> Should this be a decimal "cpu@10", or hexadecimal "cpu@a"? I can't find
> any explicit specification.
It should be hex. That's a general convention for unit addresses.
Before flattened trees, OF essentially never used decimal
representations of things.
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
sophgo@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Devicetree spec: Specifying /cpus/cpu@* unit address format?
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 14:43:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adHofcKAr7C5YCSA@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00ddad5a-02f5-474e-af9c-11ce7716ddfc@iscas.ac.cn>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 910 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 06:06:17PM +0800, Vivian Wang wrote:
> (Also posted at: https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/issues/86 )
>
> Hi all,
>
> Presently, there seems to be some confusion in the community about the
> format of unit addresses for "/cpus/cpu@*" nodes for a CPU with ID > 9, e.g.
>
> cpu@??? {
> reg = <10>;
> /* reg = <0xa>; */ /* This should be equivalent */
> }
>
>
> Should this be a decimal "cpu@10", or hexadecimal "cpu@a"? I can't find
> any explicit specification.
It should be hex. That's a general convention for unit addresses.
Before flattened trees, OF essentially never used decimal
representations of things.
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-05 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 10:06 Devicetree spec: Specifying /cpus/cpu@* unit address format? Vivian Wang
2026-04-03 10:06 ` Vivian Wang
2026-04-05 4:43 ` David Gibson [this message]
2026-04-05 4:43 ` David Gibson
2026-04-06 12:48 ` Rob Herring
2026-04-06 12:48 ` Rob Herring
2026-04-06 14:46 ` Vivian Wang
2026-04-06 14:46 ` Vivian Wang
2026-04-06 16:08 ` Kyle Bonnici
2026-04-06 16:08 ` Kyle Bonnici
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adHofcKAr7C5YCSA@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=inochiama@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sophgo@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=unicorn_wang@outlook.com \
--cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.