From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@de.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
OF-General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] IB/ehca: Support large page MRs
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:37:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaabtww8qi.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707121754.20293.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:54:19 +0200")
> Add support for MR pages larger than 4K on eHCA2. This reduces firmware
> memory consumption. If enabled via the mr_largepage module parameter, the MR
> page size will be determined based on the MR length and the hardware
> capabilities - if the MR is >= 16M, 16M pages are used, for example.
Why the module parameter? Is there any reason a user would want to
turn this off? Or conversely, why is it off by default?
Also this patch seems to depend heavily on the multiple EQ patch,
which I am holding off on now. So you may want to rebase to my
current tree, which has all the ehca patches except the EQ one.
> static ssize_t ehca_show_nr_eqs(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ehca_nr_eqs);
> }
> -
> static DEVICE_ATTR(nr_eqs, S_IRUGO, ehca_show_nr_eqs, NULL);
Although trivial, this chunk doesn't really belong in this patch --
just fix it up in the multiple EQ patch (which I haven't merged yet).
- R.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "LinuxPPC-Dev" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"OF-General" <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
"Hoang-Nam Nguyen" <hnguyen@de.ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] IB/ehca: Support large page MRs
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:37:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaabtww8qi.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707121754.20293.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:54:19 +0200")
> Add support for MR pages larger than 4K on eHCA2. This reduces firmware
> memory consumption. If enabled via the mr_largepage module parameter, the MR
> page size will be determined based on the MR length and the hardware
> capabilities - if the MR is >= 16M, 16M pages are used, for example.
Why the module parameter? Is there any reason a user would want to
turn this off? Or conversely, why is it off by default?
Also this patch seems to depend heavily on the multiple EQ patch,
which I am holding off on now. So you may want to rebase to my
current tree, which has all the ehca patches except the EQ one.
> static ssize_t ehca_show_nr_eqs(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ehca_nr_eqs);
> }
> -
> static DEVICE_ATTR(nr_eqs, S_IRUGO, ehca_show_nr_eqs, NULL);
Although trivial, this chunk doesn't really belong in this patch --
just fix it up in the multiple EQ patch (which I haven't merged yet).
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-12 15:45 [PATCH 00/10] IB/ehca: Multiple Event Queues, MR/MW rework, large page MRs, fixes Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:45 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] IB/ehca: Support for multiple event queues Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:46 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 16:04 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 16:04 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 20:34 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 20:34 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 20:37 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2007-07-16 20:37 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2007-07-17 3:48 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 3:48 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 4:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-07-17 4:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-07-17 17:52 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 17:52 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-07-17 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-07-19 15:03 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2007-07-19 15:03 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2007-07-17 5:57 ` [ofa-general] " Shirley Ma
2007-07-12 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/10] IB/ehca: Fix HW level autodetection Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:47 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] IB/ehca: fix memory leak in error path of ehca_get_dma_mr() Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:48 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] IB/ehca: use common error code mapping instead of specific ones Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:49 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 17:14 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 17:14 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 20:35 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 20:35 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] IB/ehca: use #define for "pages per register_rpage" instead of hardcoded value Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:51 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] IB/ehca: use macro to calculate number of chunks in a mem block Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:51 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] IB/ehca: MR/MW structure refactoring Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:52 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] IB/ehca: Restructure ehca_set_pagebuf() Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:53 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] IB/ehca: Fix warnings issued by checkpatch.pl Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:53 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] IB/ehca: Support large page MRs Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:54 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 17:37 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-07-16 17:37 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 21:11 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 21:11 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-17 3:50 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 3:50 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 6:29 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-17 6:29 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 17:15 ` [PATCH 00/10] IB/ehca: Multiple Event Queues, MR/MW rework, large page MRs, fixes Roland Dreier
2007-07-12 17:15 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-13 8:26 ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-13 8:26 ` Joachim Fenkes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adaabtww8qi.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=fenkes@de.ibm.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.