From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev-bounces+hnguyen=de.ibm.com@ozlabs.org,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:07:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adafyc88mvr.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: OFCFF36ACF.6FF07D9E-ONC125722F.00499C9C-C125722F.0049F685@de.ibm.com
> That's fair. I understand your decision. And thanks for queueing for
> 2.6.20. Can you please brief me on patch procedures for post-2.6.19?
What do you mean by post-2.6.19? Things go into 2.6.19.x via
stable@kernel.org, if that's what you're asking.
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describes what patches are
appropriate for 2.6.19.x, and given that we're so close to the 2.6.19
final release, I'm working under similar rules for what I'm going to
merge into 2.6.19.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linuxppc-dev-bounces+hnguyen=de.ibm.com@ozlabs.org,
openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:07:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adafyc88mvr.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: OFCFF36ACF.6FF07D9E-ONC125722F.00499C9C-C125722F.0049F685@de.ibm.com
> That's fair. I understand your decision. And thanks for queueing for
> 2.6.20. Can you please brief me on patch procedures for post-2.6.19?
What do you mean by post-2.6.19? Things go into 2.6.19.x via
stable@kernel.org, if that's what you're asking.
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describes what patches are
appropriate for 2.6.19.x, and given that we're so close to the 2.6.19
final release, I'm working under similar rules for what I'm going to
merge into 2.6.19.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-24 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-20 22:54 [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2006-11-21 16:47 ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-21 16:47 ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-22 9:29 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2006-11-22 9:29 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2006-11-22 23:04 ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-22 23:04 ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-23 13:31 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2006-11-23 13:31 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2006-11-24 23:07 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2006-11-24 23:07 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adafyc88mvr.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hnguyen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-bounces+hnguyen=de.ibm.com@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
--cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.