From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: GIT bisection range errors
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 16:33:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adave1oqslr.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080508225645.GA24725@deepthought> (Ken Moffat's message of "Thu, 8 May 2008 23:56:45 +0100")
> > $ git checkout -b rc v2.6.26-rc1
> > $ git bisect start
> > $ git bisect bad
> > $ git bisect good v2.6.25
> >
> > Yet, during this I'm finding myself at 2.6.25-rc6 and 2.6.25-rc8
> > as the last two results (both good...).
> I reported a similar thing at the beginning of April
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/2/390 - 2.6.25-rc1 bad, 2.6.24 good, git
> dropped me back at 2.6.24-rc4 (again, according to the top level
> Makefile).
This is normal and expected, due to the distributed nature of git and
the fact that git-bisect operates on the full topology of history and
not just a linear sequence of commits.
Imagine history like:
A---B---C---D
\ /
\ /
\ /
E---F
where B is good and D is bad. Now, when you bisect, there is no way to
know whether, say, E is good or bad and hence the bisect process may
present E as a tree to try.
Now, if B is the 2.6.25 release, then since E branched off before B, it
will have a Makefile that says 2.6.25-rcX. Which is exactly the
behavior you are seeing.
In short, everything looks fine and is behaving as expected.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 22:20 GIT bisection range errors Rene Herman
2008-05-08 22:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-08 22:36 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 22:56 ` Ken Moffat
2008-05-08 23:33 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2008-05-09 1:12 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-09 21:10 ` Ken Moffat
2008-05-09 21:45 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-05-10 16:52 ` Ken Moffat
2008-05-08 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-08 23:12 ` Rene Herman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adave1oqslr.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.