From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, timmurray@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: process_mrelease: introduce PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL flag
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:25:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afHAi0E11D5sg_9y@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afE2xchFRh2xARBn@google.com>
On Tue 28-04-26 15:37:57, Minchan Kim wrote:
[...]
> >From be4bd22a100ed6be2d1d2599ddb9da04043143eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:27:08 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: process_mrelease: introduce PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL
> flag
>
> Currently, process_mrelease() requires userspace to send a SIGKILL signal
> prior to invocation. This separation introduces a scheduling race window
> where the victim task may receive the signal and enter the exit path
> before the reaper can invoke process_mrelease().
>
> When the victim enters the exit path (do_exit -> exit_mm), it clears its
> task->mm immediately. This causes process_mrelease() to fail with -ESRCH,
> leaving the actual address space teardown (exit_mmap) to be deferred until
> the mm's reference count drops to zero. In the field (e.g., Android),
> arbitrary reference counts (reading /proc/<pid>/cmdline, or various other
> remote VM accesses) frequently delay this teardown indefinitely,
> defeating the purpose of expedited reclamation.
>
> In Android's LMKD scenarios, this delay keeps memory pressure high, forcing
> the system to unnecessarily kill additional innocent background apps before
> the memory from the first victim is recovered.
>
> This patch introduces the PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL UAPI flag to support
> an integrated auto-kill mode. When specified, process_mrelease() directly
> injects a SIGKILL into the target task after finding its mm.
>
> To solve the race condition, we grab the mm reference via mmgrab() before
> sending the SIGKILL. If the user passed PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL, we assume
> it will free its memory and proceed with reaping, making the logic as simple
> as reap = reap_kill || task_will_free_mem(p).
>
> To handle shared address spaces safely in the auto-kill mode, we bail out
> immediately if the mm is marked with MMF_MULTIPROCESS when
> PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL is specified. This protects existing users of
> process_mrelease() from behavior changes while preventing unsafe reaping of
> shared memory.
Please explain why this is a different behavior from the global oom
killer and how do you intend to deal with those mm shared process
groups. I am not saying this is a wrong behavior but it will be hard to
change once in place.
> Fundamentally, this allows process_mrelease() to trigger targeted memory
> reclaim (via oom_reaper infrastructure) quickly, even if the victim is
> not yet in the exit path, while reusing existing race handling between
> reaper and exit_mmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Other than the above looks ok to me.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 23:02 [PATCH v1 0/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim and add auto-kill Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim via mmu_gather Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 7:56 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 21:24 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-27 22:04 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 19:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-24 21:56 ` Minchan Kim
2026-05-05 14:53 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-05-08 21:56 ` Minchan Kim
2026-05-11 16:13 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-05-11 21:48 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] mm: process_mrelease: skip LRU movement for exclusive file folios Minchan Kim
2026-04-22 7:22 ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-23 23:38 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 7:51 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-24 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 19:15 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 7:16 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 16:48 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-27 17:15 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 23:05 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-28 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 1:19 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 8:18 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 9:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 13:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 14:44 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-30 6:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-08 20:57 ` Liam R. Howlett
2026-05-11 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-13 6:47 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 21:41 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-30 14:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 21:42 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 19:26 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: process_mrelease: introduce PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL flag Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 7:57 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-24 22:49 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 22:03 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-28 7:01 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-28 22:37 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 8:25 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2026-04-29 20:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-29 21:17 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 21:16 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 20:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-27 22:52 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afHAi0E11D5sg_9y@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.