All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT:Keyword:b(?i:clang|llvm)b"
	<llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: allow COMPILE_TEST builds
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 10:50:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agHspp1KZHZmMeOy@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509003602.956186-1-rosenp@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 05:36:02PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> COMMON_CLK_ROCKCHIP already gates the Rockchip clock objects inside the
> Rockchip clock Makefile.  Allow selecting it for COMPILE_TEST and use it
> for the parent Makefile descent instead of ARCH_ROCKCHIP.
> 
> The per-SoC Rockchip clock symbols already have COMPILE_TEST dependencies,
> so this exposes the existing build coverage to other architectures without
> selecting the Rockchip platform.
> 
> Tested with:
> make LLVM=1 ARCH=loongarch drivers/clk/rockchip/
> 
> Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT:Keyword:b(?i:clang|llvm)b"
	<llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: allow COMPILE_TEST builds
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 10:50:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agHspp1KZHZmMeOy@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509003602.956186-1-rosenp@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 05:36:02PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> COMMON_CLK_ROCKCHIP already gates the Rockchip clock objects inside the
> Rockchip clock Makefile.  Allow selecting it for COMPILE_TEST and use it
> for the parent Makefile descent instead of ARCH_ROCKCHIP.
> 
> The per-SoC Rockchip clock symbols already have COMPILE_TEST dependencies,
> so this exposes the existing build coverage to other architectures without
> selecting the Rockchip platform.
> 
> Tested with:
> make LLVM=1 ARCH=loongarch drivers/clk/rockchip/
> 
> Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-09  0:36 [PATCH] clk: rockchip: allow COMPILE_TEST builds Rosen Penev
2026-05-09  0:36 ` Rosen Penev
2026-05-11 14:50 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2026-05-11 14:50   ` Brian Masney
2026-05-13 10:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-05-13 10:37   ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agHspp1KZHZmMeOy@redhat.com \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.