From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
To: Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Frank.Li@nxp.com,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, hcazarim@yahoo.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: imx: scu-irq: accumulate wakeup sources via sysfs_emit_at()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:29:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agprgizn9lF7utJ5@shlinux89> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260516090726.38362-1-sozdayvek@gmail.com>
Hi Stepan,
On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 02:07:26PM +0500, Stepan Ionichev wrote:
>On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:15:54AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is a horrible sysfs file, and breaks all the rules. Why not just
>> delete it and use the proper api for it instead?
>
>Yeah, fair. The sprintf change just papers over the real issue, which
>is the interface itself.
>
>Quick check: no Documentation/ABI/ entry, github code search returns
>nothing outside the kernel tree itself
>(https://github.com/search?q=scu_wakeup_irqs&type=code), and
>codesearch.debian.net also shows zero hits. So removing the attribute
>looks doable.
>
>Frank, Sascha -- any out-of-tree readers of
>/sys/firmware/scu_wakeup_irqs/wakeup_src I should worry about? If
>not, I'll send v2 that drops the attribute and logs the wakeup source
I think it is safe to drop, thanks for working on this.
Thanks
Peng
>via dev_info() instead.
>
>Stepan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 17:50 [PATCH] firmware: imx: scu-irq: accumulate wakeup sources via sysfs_emit_at() Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-16 7:15 ` Greg KH
2026-05-16 9:07 ` Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-16 9:20 ` Greg KH
2026-05-18 1:29 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2026-05-18 9:39 ` [PATCH v2] firmware: imx: scu-irq: drop wakeup_src sysfs file, log via dev_dbg() Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-18 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 18:05 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agprgizn9lF7utJ5@shlinux89 \
--to=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hcazarim@yahoo.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sozdayvek@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.