Re: [PATCH v4 06/24] iommu: Defer iommu_group free via kfree_rcu()

[Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>]

On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 08:39:16AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 08:38:49PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > dev->iommu_group will be read in an ISR-context to look up a group_device
> > for fault reporting, in which case mutex cannot be used. For that read to
> > be safe, two things are needed:
> 
> What driver does this? iommu_report_device_fault() has to be called in
> a sleepable context - usually a threaded IRQ handler. So mutex is no
> problem.

It's used in an invalidation context, where mutex is a problem.

> This seems like Sashiko slop - iommu_group does not change while a
> driver is attached and a driver is not permitted to do any "fault
> handling" after it has detached, it must flush and synchronize its
> IRQ if it is using this from a hard IRQ for some bad reason.

Oh, I probably picked a wrong word. "fault" here means "ATS broken".

IOMMU driver sees ATC timeout during invalidation, and reports "ATS
broken" in a lockless context where device could be detached. No?

> You need to be alot more critical about the noise that Sashiko
> generates, alot is useful, alot is not. It is a not a tool you want to
> have 0 reports, complaining about hallucinations is expected.

OK. I will be more aware of that in the future.

Thanks
Nicolin