From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Zeng Heng <zengheng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: yezhenyu2@huawei.com, zhurui3@huawei.com, will@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
zengheng4@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: tlb: Flush walk cache when unsharing PMD tables
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 11:13:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahAsPU00ZTTJV3Ye@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7098272-a348-d918-774a-d5d2645fc7f4@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 01:32:07PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
> On 2026/5/21 23:15, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 03:30:11PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
> > > > From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
> > > >
> > > > When huge_pmd_unshare() is called to unshare a PMD table, the
> > > > tlb_unshare_pmd_ptdesc() function sets tlb->unshared_tables=true
> > > > but the aarch64 tlb_flush() only checked tlb->freed_tables to
> > > > determine whether to use TLBF_NONE (vae1is, invalidates walk
> > > > cache) or TLBF_NOWALKCACHE (vale1is, leaf-only).
> > > >
> > > > This caused the stale PMD page table entry to remain in the walk cache
> > > > after unshare, potentially leading to incorrect page table walks.
> > > >
> > > > Fix by including unshared_tables in the check, so that when
> > > > unsharing tables, TLBF_NONE is used and the walk cache is properly
> > > > invalidated.
> > > >
> > > > Here is the detailed distinction between vae1is and vale1is:
> > > >
> > > > | Instruction Combination | Actual Invalidation Scope |
> > > > | ------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------|
> > > > | `VAE1IS` + TTL=`0` | All entries at all levels (full invalidation) |
> > > > | `VAE1IS` + TTL=`2` (L2) | Non-leaf at Level 0/1 + leaf at Level 2 |
> > > > | `VALE1IS` + TTL=`0` | Leaf entries at all levels (non-leaf not cleared) |
> > > > | `VALE1IS` + TTL=`2` (L2) | Leaf entry at Level 2 only |
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
> > > The fix looks fine but does it need:
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8ce720d5bd91 ("mm/hugetlb: fix excessive IPI broadcasts when unsharing PMD tables using mmu_gather")
> > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> > > > index 10869d7731b8..751bd57bc3ba 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> > > > @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static inline int tlb_get_level(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> > > > static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> > > > {
> > > > struct vm_area_struct vma = TLB_FLUSH_VMA(tlb->mm, 0);
> > > > - tlbf_t flags = tlb->freed_tables ? TLBF_NONE : TLBF_NOWALKCACHE;
> > > > + tlbf_t flags = (tlb->freed_tables || tlb->unshared_tables) ?
> > > > + TLBF_NONE : TLBF_NOWALKCACHE;
> > > > unsigned long stride = tlb_get_unmap_size(tlb);
> > > > int tlb_level = tlb_get_level(tlb);
> > Do we need this as well?
>
> The proposed fix has been validated against the issue scenarios and
> works as expected.
>
> Per the ARM Architecture Reference Manual, whether only the last-level
> page table entry is invalidated is determined by the instruction used
> (vale1is for leaf entry only, vae1is for walk cache including leaf entry and
> non-leaf entry), rather than the TTL field. The TTL field merely specifies
> which level the leaf entry belongs to.
Ah, yes, you are right. The TTL is still 2 in this case for a huge pmd,
we just want the walk cache leading to it to be invalidated. So no need
for the additional tlb_get_level().
Thanks.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 7:30 [PATCH] arm64: tlb: Flush walk cache when unsharing PMD tables Zeng Heng
2026-05-21 15:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-05-21 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-05-22 5:32 ` Zeng Heng
2026-05-22 10:13 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-05-22 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-05-25 1:25 ` Zeng Heng
2026-05-22 4:43 ` Zeng Heng
2026-05-22 10:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-05-25 9:20 ` Zeng Heng
2026-05-26 13:01 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahAsPU00ZTTJV3Ye@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yezhenyu2@huawei.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
--cc=zengheng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=zhurui3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.