From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>,
steve.kang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block"
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:21:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajAYaEWFnZwDF1Ty@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3948889-4ac3-422b-8dcf-fd3a7c27b304@kernel.org>
On 06/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 6/8/26 17:09, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
> >
> > This reverts commit 9609dd704725a40cd63d915f2ab6c44248a44598.
> >
> > The kernel panics are keeping to be reported especially when the f2fs
> > partition get almost full. By investigation, we find that the reason is
> > one f2fs page got freed to buddy without being deleted from LRU and the
> > root cause is the race happened in [2] which is enrolled by this commit.
> >
> > There are 3 race processes in this scenario, please find below for their
> > main activities.
> >
> > The changed code in move_data_block() lets the GC path evict the tail-end
> > folio from the page cache through folio_end_dropbehind(). Once
> > folio_unmap_invalidate() removes the folio from mapping->i_pages, the
> > page-cache references for all pages in the folio are dropped. The folio
> > is then kept alive only by temporary external references, which allows a
> > later split to operate on a folio whose subpages are no longer protected
> > by page-cache references.
> >
> > After the page-cache references are gone, split_folio_to_order() can
> > split the big folio into individual pages and put the resulting subpages
> > back on the LRU. For tail pages beyond EOF, split removes them from the
> > page cache and drops their page-cache references. A tail page can then
> > remain on the LRU with PG_lru set while holding only the split caller's
> > temporary reference. When free_folio_and_swap_cache() drops that final
> > reference, the page enters the final folio_put() release path.
> >
> > In parallel, folio_isolate_lru() can observe the same tail page with a
> > non-zero refcount and PG_lru set. It clears PG_lru before taking its own
> > reference. If this races with the final folio_put() from the split path,
> > __folio_put() sees PG_lru already cleared and skips lruvec_del_folio().
> > The page is then freed back to the allocator while its lru links are
> > still present in the LRU list. A later LRU operation on a neighboring
> > page detects the stale link and reports list corruption.
> >
> > [1]
> > [ 22.486082] list_del corruption. next->prev should be fffffffec10e0ac8, but was dead000000000122. (next=fffffffec10e0a88)
> > [ 22.486130] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 22.486134] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:67!
> > [ 22.486141] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
> > [ 22.488502] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE
> > [ 22.488506] Hardware name: Spreadtrum UMS9230 1H10 SoC (DT)
> > [ 22.488511] pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > [ 22.488517] pc : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154
> > [ 22.488531] lr : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154
> > [ 22.488539] sp : ffffffc08006b830
> > [ 22.488542] x29: ffffffc08006b868 x28: 0000000000003020 x27: 0000000000000000
> > [ 22.488553] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: fffffffec10e0ac0
> > [ 22.488564] x23: 00000000000000e8 x22: 0000000000000024 x21: dead000000000122
> > [ 22.488574] x20: fffffffec10e0a88 x19: fffffffec10e0ac8 x18: ffffffc080061060
> > [ 22.488585] x17: 20747562202c3863 x16: 6130653031636566 x15: 0000000000000058
> > [ 22.488595] x14: 0000000000000004 x13: ffffff80f91e0000 x12: 0000000000000003
> > [ 22.488605] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffe85721f0e25f00
> > [ 22.488615] x8 : ffe85721f0e25f00 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 6c65645f7473696c
> > [ 22.488625] x5 : ffffffed39b23026 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000010
> > [ 22.488636] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 000000000000006d
> > [ 22.488647] Call trace:
> > [ 22.488651] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154 (P)
> > [ 22.488661] __folio_put+0x2bc/0x434
> > [ 22.488670] folio_put+0x28/0x58
> > [ 22.488678] do_garbage_collect+0x1a34/0x2584
> > [ 22.488689] f2fs_gc+0x230/0x9b4
> > [ 22.488697] f2fs_fallocate+0xb90/0xdf4
> > [ 22.488706] vfs_fallocate+0x1b4/0x2bc
> > [ 22.488716] __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x44/0x78
> > [ 22.488725] invoke_syscall+0x58/0xe4
> > [ 22.488732] do_el0_svc+0x48/0xdc
> > [ 22.488739] el0_svc+0x3c/0x98
> > [ 22.488747] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x20/0x130
> > [ 22.488754] el0t_64_sync+0x1c4/0x1c8
> >
> > [2]
> > CPU0 (f2fs GC) CPU1 (split_folio_to_order) CPU2 (folio_isolate_lru)
> >
> > F: pagecache refs = n
> > F: extra refs = GC + split
> > F: PG_lru set
> > move_data_block()
> > folio = f2fs_grab_cache_folio(F)
> > ...
> > __folio_set_dropbehind(F)
> > folio_unlock(F)
> > folio_end_dropbehind(F)
> > folio_unmap_invalidate(F)
> > __filemap_remove_folio(F)
> > folio_put_refs(F, n)
> > folio_put(F)
> > split_folio_to_order(F)
> > folio_ref_freeze(F, 1)
> > ...
> > lru_add_split_folio(T)
> > list_add_tail(&T->lru, &F->lru)
> > folio_set_lru(T)
> > __filemap_remove_folio(T)
> > folio_put_refs(T, 1)
> > /* T refcount == 1, PageLRU set */
> > folio_isolate_lru(T)
> > folio_test_clear_lru(T)
> > free_folio_and_swap_cache(T)
> > folio_put(T)
> > /* refcount: 1 -> 0 */
> > __folio_put(T)
> > __page_cache_release(T)
> > folio_test_lru(T) == false
> > /* skip lruvec_del_folio(T) */
> > free_frozen_pages(T)
> > folio_get(T)
> > lruvec_del_folio(T)
> > later:
> > list_del(adjacent->lru)
> > next == &T->lru
> > next->prev == LIST_POISON / PCP freelist
> > BUG
> >
>
> Missing Fixes and Cc: stable lines.
Applied with them.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
>
> I suspect this is a bug of MM, we can revert this first, and reapply after we
> fix this iusse in MM.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 +-----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index ba93010924c0..3084e05e22f2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -1468,11 +1468,7 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
> > put_out:
> > f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> > out:
> > - if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> > - __folio_set_dropbehind(folio);
> > - folio_unlock(folio);
> > - folio_end_dropbehind(folio);
> > - folio_put(folio);
> > + f2fs_folio_put(folio, true);
> > return err;
> > }
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steve.kang@unisoc.com,
"zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block"
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:21:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajAYaEWFnZwDF1Ty@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3948889-4ac3-422b-8dcf-fd3a7c27b304@kernel.org>
On 06/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 6/8/26 17:09, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
> >
> > This reverts commit 9609dd704725a40cd63d915f2ab6c44248a44598.
> >
> > The kernel panics are keeping to be reported especially when the f2fs
> > partition get almost full. By investigation, we find that the reason is
> > one f2fs page got freed to buddy without being deleted from LRU and the
> > root cause is the race happened in [2] which is enrolled by this commit.
> >
> > There are 3 race processes in this scenario, please find below for their
> > main activities.
> >
> > The changed code in move_data_block() lets the GC path evict the tail-end
> > folio from the page cache through folio_end_dropbehind(). Once
> > folio_unmap_invalidate() removes the folio from mapping->i_pages, the
> > page-cache references for all pages in the folio are dropped. The folio
> > is then kept alive only by temporary external references, which allows a
> > later split to operate on a folio whose subpages are no longer protected
> > by page-cache references.
> >
> > After the page-cache references are gone, split_folio_to_order() can
> > split the big folio into individual pages and put the resulting subpages
> > back on the LRU. For tail pages beyond EOF, split removes them from the
> > page cache and drops their page-cache references. A tail page can then
> > remain on the LRU with PG_lru set while holding only the split caller's
> > temporary reference. When free_folio_and_swap_cache() drops that final
> > reference, the page enters the final folio_put() release path.
> >
> > In parallel, folio_isolate_lru() can observe the same tail page with a
> > non-zero refcount and PG_lru set. It clears PG_lru before taking its own
> > reference. If this races with the final folio_put() from the split path,
> > __folio_put() sees PG_lru already cleared and skips lruvec_del_folio().
> > The page is then freed back to the allocator while its lru links are
> > still present in the LRU list. A later LRU operation on a neighboring
> > page detects the stale link and reports list corruption.
> >
> > [1]
> > [ 22.486082] list_del corruption. next->prev should be fffffffec10e0ac8, but was dead000000000122. (next=fffffffec10e0a88)
> > [ 22.486130] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 22.486134] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:67!
> > [ 22.486141] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
> > [ 22.488502] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE
> > [ 22.488506] Hardware name: Spreadtrum UMS9230 1H10 SoC (DT)
> > [ 22.488511] pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > [ 22.488517] pc : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154
> > [ 22.488531] lr : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154
> > [ 22.488539] sp : ffffffc08006b830
> > [ 22.488542] x29: ffffffc08006b868 x28: 0000000000003020 x27: 0000000000000000
> > [ 22.488553] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: fffffffec10e0ac0
> > [ 22.488564] x23: 00000000000000e8 x22: 0000000000000024 x21: dead000000000122
> > [ 22.488574] x20: fffffffec10e0a88 x19: fffffffec10e0ac8 x18: ffffffc080061060
> > [ 22.488585] x17: 20747562202c3863 x16: 6130653031636566 x15: 0000000000000058
> > [ 22.488595] x14: 0000000000000004 x13: ffffff80f91e0000 x12: 0000000000000003
> > [ 22.488605] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffe85721f0e25f00
> > [ 22.488615] x8 : ffe85721f0e25f00 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 6c65645f7473696c
> > [ 22.488625] x5 : ffffffed39b23026 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000010
> > [ 22.488636] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 000000000000006d
> > [ 22.488647] Call trace:
> > [ 22.488651] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154 (P)
> > [ 22.488661] __folio_put+0x2bc/0x434
> > [ 22.488670] folio_put+0x28/0x58
> > [ 22.488678] do_garbage_collect+0x1a34/0x2584
> > [ 22.488689] f2fs_gc+0x230/0x9b4
> > [ 22.488697] f2fs_fallocate+0xb90/0xdf4
> > [ 22.488706] vfs_fallocate+0x1b4/0x2bc
> > [ 22.488716] __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x44/0x78
> > [ 22.488725] invoke_syscall+0x58/0xe4
> > [ 22.488732] do_el0_svc+0x48/0xdc
> > [ 22.488739] el0_svc+0x3c/0x98
> > [ 22.488747] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x20/0x130
> > [ 22.488754] el0t_64_sync+0x1c4/0x1c8
> >
> > [2]
> > CPU0 (f2fs GC) CPU1 (split_folio_to_order) CPU2 (folio_isolate_lru)
> >
> > F: pagecache refs = n
> > F: extra refs = GC + split
> > F: PG_lru set
> > move_data_block()
> > folio = f2fs_grab_cache_folio(F)
> > ...
> > __folio_set_dropbehind(F)
> > folio_unlock(F)
> > folio_end_dropbehind(F)
> > folio_unmap_invalidate(F)
> > __filemap_remove_folio(F)
> > folio_put_refs(F, n)
> > folio_put(F)
> > split_folio_to_order(F)
> > folio_ref_freeze(F, 1)
> > ...
> > lru_add_split_folio(T)
> > list_add_tail(&T->lru, &F->lru)
> > folio_set_lru(T)
> > __filemap_remove_folio(T)
> > folio_put_refs(T, 1)
> > /* T refcount == 1, PageLRU set */
> > folio_isolate_lru(T)
> > folio_test_clear_lru(T)
> > free_folio_and_swap_cache(T)
> > folio_put(T)
> > /* refcount: 1 -> 0 */
> > __folio_put(T)
> > __page_cache_release(T)
> > folio_test_lru(T) == false
> > /* skip lruvec_del_folio(T) */
> > free_frozen_pages(T)
> > folio_get(T)
> > lruvec_del_folio(T)
> > later:
> > list_del(adjacent->lru)
> > next == &T->lru
> > next->prev == LIST_POISON / PCP freelist
> > BUG
> >
>
> Missing Fixes and Cc: stable lines.
Applied with them.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
>
> I suspect this is a bug of MM, we can revert this first, and reapply after we
> fix this iusse in MM.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 +-----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index ba93010924c0..3084e05e22f2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -1468,11 +1468,7 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
> > put_out:
> > f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> > out:
> > - if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> > - __folio_set_dropbehind(folio);
> > - folio_unlock(folio);
> > - folio_end_dropbehind(folio);
> > - folio_put(folio);
> > + f2fs_folio_put(folio, true);
> > return err;
> > }
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 9:09 [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block" zhaoyang.huang
2026-06-08 9:09 ` [f2fs-dev] " zhaoyang.huang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-09 0:28 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2026-06-09 0:28 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2026-06-12 3:25 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-12 3:25 ` Chao Yu
2026-06-12 3:57 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zhaoyang Huang
2026-06-12 3:57 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2026-06-15 15:21 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2026-06-15 15:21 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajAYaEWFnZwDF1Ty@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve.kang@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.