Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs/025: test to do sanity check section type correctly in f2fs GC

[Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>]

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 11:33:20AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 6/16/26 04:05, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 04:22:34PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 6/15/26 01:16, Zorro Lang wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 12:58:02AM +0000, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>> Without commit 520760b9f915 ("f2fs: optimize representative type determination
> >>>> in GC"), f2fs GC will report inconsistent segment type in large section issue,
> >>>> and then it will force to shutdown filesystem.
> >>>>
> >>>> [  768.190903] F2FS-fs (loop51): Inconsistent segment (3) type [1, 0] in SIT and SSA
> >>>>
> >>>> The reason is f2fs kernel will assume all segment type inside large section is
> >>>> the same, during GC it loads type from one segment and compare it to other
> >>>> segments' type, however due to recovery flow, the chosen segment may has zero
> >>>> valid blocks w/ different segment type, since the segment is invalid(free) one,
> >>>> it will never be migrated, so that we should not treat such state as abnormal
> >>>> condition.
> >>>>
> >>>> This testcase is created to simulate above condition to see whether f2fs kernel
> >>>> module can handle it correctly
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v2:
> >>>> - clear MKFS_OPTIONS and MOUNT_OPTIONS to guarantee block allocation is as expected.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, I just noticed your reply to my review on the previous patch version.
> >>> Due to some unexpected shake-ups recently, I’ve been bogged down with setting
> >>> up and modifying various new system environments, and I accidentally marked
> >>> some unread emails as read.
> >>
> >> No worries. :)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The patch looks good to me, with just a few picky review points below:
> >>
> >> Thanks Zorro for taking a look.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>  tests/f2fs/025     | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  tests/f2fs/025.out |  2 +
> >>>>  2 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
> >>>>  create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/025
> >>>>  create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/025.out
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/025 b/tests/f2fs/025
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 000000000..397e5439a
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/025
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> >>>> +#! /bin/bash
> >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>>> +# Copyright (c) 2026 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> >>>> +#
> >>>> +# FS QA Test No. f2fs/025
> >>>> +#
> >>>> +# Check whether f2fs will encounter cp_error (Inconsistent segment type)
> >>>> +# when doing sanity check on type of segments inside large section during
> >>>> +# garbage collection.
> >>>> +#
> >>>> +. ./common/preamble
> >>>> +_begin_fstest auto quick
> >>>> +
> >>>> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit 520760b9f915 \
> >>>> +	"f2fs: optimize representative type determination in GC"
> >>>> +
> >>>> +. ./common/filter
> >>>> +
> >>>> +_cleanup()
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	cd /
> >>>> +	rm -r -f $tmp.*
> >>>> +}
> >>>
> >>> This _cleanup() function is same as default. It can be removed.
> >>
> >> Will remove.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +_require_scratch
> >>>> +_require_xfs_io_command "pwrite"
> >>>> +_require_xfs_io_command "truncate"
> >>>> +_require_command "$F2FS_IO_PROG" f2fs_io
> >>>> +_require_check_dmesg
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Clear options to avoid interference from external configurations
> >>>> +export MKFS_OPTIONS=""
> >>>> +export MOUNT_OPTIONS=""
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Format with 96MB size and 2 segments per section
> >>>> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $((96 * 1024 * 1024)) "" "-s 2" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Mount with mode=lfs
> >>>> +_scratch_mount -o mode=lfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>> It's helpless, due to if _scratch_mount fails, it exit() directly.
> >>
> >> Right, will fix.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Create files to fill whole filesystem, then segment type will be changed to node type
> >>>> +for ((i=0;i<5120;i++)) do
> >>>> +	touch $SCRATCH_MNT/$i >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +done
> >>>> +sync
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Remove all files to create free(empty) node segments
> >>>> +rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/*
> >>>> +sync
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Allocate free space so that we have chance to reuse free(empty) node segments
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 1928k" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +sync
> >>>> +
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 0" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 16M" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 0" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 16M" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 0" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +sync
> >>>> +
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 8M" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 0" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 32K" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 0" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 2M" -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/file >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Shutdown the filesystem without checkpoint
> >>>> +$F2FS_IO_PROG shutdown 2 $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>
> >>> I'm wondering if we can have f2fs supporting in common _scratch_shutdown
> >>> helper :)
> >>
> >> I think we can change f2fs testcase to use _scratch_shutdown because the definition of
> >> nologflush shutdown interface is the same as xfs':
> >>
> >> /*
> >>  * should be same as XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN.
> >>  * Flags for going down operation used by FS_IOC_GOINGDOWN
> >>  */
> >> #define F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN	_IOR('X', 125, __u32)	/* Shutdown */
> >> #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
> >>
> >> #define XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN	     _IOR ('X', 125, uint32_t)
> >> #define XFS_FSOP_GOING_FLAGS_NOLOGFLUSH		0x2	/* don't flush log nor data */
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +_scratch_unmount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>
> >>> If unmount fails, how about let it output the errors, to break the golden image?
> >>
> >> Yes, it's better.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +_scratch_mount -o mode=lfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>                               helpless
> >>
> >> Will fix.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Run urgent_gc mode to trigger garbage collection
> >>>> +dev_name=$(_short_dev $SCRATCH_DEV)
> >>>> +if [ -f /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent ]; then
> >>>> +	echo 1 > /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent
> >>>> +fi
> >>>
> >>> Hmm... what if there's not /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent? Does it
> >>> affect the test result?
> >>>
> >>> If it does, this's a necessary requirement for this test, we shouldn't
> >>> ignore it and keep running. Does $F2FS_IO_PROG provide a command to
> >>> make a force GC? Or we need to check this file and _notrun if it's
> >>> not existed.
> >>
> >> Ah, right, that's good point!
> >>
> >> We can use "$F2FS_IO_PROG gc_urgent <dev_name> run 5" instead, it will do below commands:
> > 
> > Great, I just hope the *gc_urgent* isn't a new feature which needs something likes:
> 
> I guess it's not a new subcommand for f2fs_io,
> 
> commit 22d758e2e6af210dc9e6cdf99438f063383ba72f
> Author: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Date:   Tue Feb 19 19:07:21 2019 -0800
> 
>     f2fs_io: add gc_urgent
> 
>     e.g.,
>     f2fs_io gc_urgent dm-4 [start/end/run] [time in sec]
> 
>     This controls sysfs/gc_urgent to run f2fs_gc urgently.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> 
> > `_require_f2fs_io gc_urgent` (there's not _require_f2fs_io:)
> 
> Agreed, we need to introduce _require_f2fs_io(), let me work on this.

Oh, 2019 was 7 years ago. No one should be complaining about this unless
they're on a super old downstream f2fs-tools. But anyway, having
_require_f2fs_io is definitely good for future f2fs testing :)

Therefore, _require_f2fs_io is not strictly urgent for this patch. It's up to
you whether to include it now or handle it in a later update.

> 
> > 
> >> 1. echo 1 > /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent
> >> 2. sleep 5 seconds
> >> 3. echo 0 > /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent
> > 
> > It also depends on the /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent too. So we have to face
> > the same question:
> >   If this file doesn't exist, should this test case _notrun?
> 
> Oh, right, maybe we can introduce _require_f2fs_sysfs() to check whether f2fs kernel
> module has supported target sysfs node?

There's a _require_fs_sysfs_attr, so...

if you don't care about $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted or not, you can:
  _require_fs_sysfs_attr $TEST_DEV gc_urgent

or after _scratch_mount:
  _require_fs_sysfs_attr $SCRATCH_DEV gc_urgent

Then I think you can either use `$F2FS_IO_PROG gc_urgent`, or if you're worried
about its compatibility, you can:
  _set_fs_sysfs_attr $SCRATCH_DEV gc_urgent 1
  sleep 5

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Wait background GC thread to wake up to run and potentially encounter the inconsistency
> >>>> +sleep 5
> >>>
> >>> Does this sleep try to wait above "echo 1 > /sys/fs/f2fs/$dev_name/gc_urgent"?
> >>> If so, it makes more sense to move it into the "if-then" logic.
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +_scratch_unmount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>> Same as above.
> >>
> >> Will fix.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +# Check whether the dmesg has the warning indicating the bug
> >>>> +_check_dmesg_for "F2FS-fs \($dev_name\): Inconsistent segment" && \
> >>>> +	_fail "F2FS-fs ($dev_name): Inconsistent segment type detected in dmesg!"
> >>>> +
> >>>> +echo "Silence is golden"
> >>>> +status=0
> >>>> +exit
> >>>
> >>> We've replaced "status=0;exit;" with "_exit 0".
> >>
> >> Will fix.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Zorro
> >>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/025.out b/tests/f2fs/025.out
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 000000000..3d70951ef
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/025.out
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> >>>> +QA output created by 025
> >>>> +Silence is golden
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> 2.49.0
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel