All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	 Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	 Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:41:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajvczSpMOGWFhe30@pedro-suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-2-70a54f3775bb@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 08:05:56PM +0900, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> Since kmalloc_nolock() always fails in NMI and hardirq contexts on
> PREEMPT_RT, slub_kunit cannot properly test _nolock() APIs.
> 
> Register a kprobe pre-handler to invoke kmalloc_nolock() and
> kfree_nolock() in the middle of the slab allocator. However, do not
> register the handler on UP kernels [1].

Maybe explain in the commit message why that is?
 
> To attach the pre-handler while s->cpu_sheaves->lock or n->list_lock
> is held, add a wrapper function for lockdep_assert_held() that calls
> a no-op function slab_attach_kprobe_locked() on debug builds. The

Why lockdep? Wouldn't it make more sense to add these triggers after
locking these locks?

> function is optimized away when neither CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING nor
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is selected and register_kprobe() fails.
> 
> The function calls barrier() to prevent the compiler from optimizing
> away its callsites. Otherwise, the compiler may consider the function
> does not have any side effect and remove callsites.

My wider comment is the following: this looks very useful but perhaps should
be lifted to Kunit itself? There's already function redirection (which could
be used for this as well). I don't know if that suits your purposes?
Choosing to say "I want to hook this random function using kprobe and give
it custom behavior" sounds lovely for all sorts of testing.

-- 
Pedro

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15 11:05 [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/9] slub_kunit: fall back to SW perf events when HW PMU is not available Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 12:58   ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-16  5:23     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 20:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-16  6:57   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 13:41   ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/9] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  7:55   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-16  9:20     ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17  5:32     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-17  5:58       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:28   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  9:51   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:30   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 5/9] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 13:03   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:37   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 6/9] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 17:24   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17  5:14     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-17  5:38       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17 20:40         ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-18 12:46           ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-18 16:26             ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 17:28   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-21  0:29   ` XIAO WU
2026-06-22  5:28     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-22 14:56       ` XIAO WU
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 8/9] mm/slab: introduce struct kfree_rcu_head and use in kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 17:36   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 9/9] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-16 17:38   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-15 11:43 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-16  4:57   ` Harry Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajvczSpMOGWFhe30@pedro-suse \
    --to=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.