From: Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Jan Prusakowski <jprusakowski@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] generic/064: allow 50 extents on F2FS after fcollapse
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:37:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akKd2IImO7bRjVV2@zlang-mailbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajuLORVplOvEXvnI@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 12:46:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 07:04:38AM +0000, Jan Prusakowski wrote:
> > On F2FS, generic/064 fails with "extents mismatched before = 1 after =
> > 50" following multiple fcollapse (collapse range) operations.
> >
> > To ensure crash consistency and checkpoint integrity, F2FS forbids
> > in-place SSR (Summary Standalone Replacement) overwrites on valid
> > checkpointed blocks. When collapse range shifts blocks, F2FS allocates
> > new data pages in LFS mode (out-of-place log writes). As a result,
> > sequential collapse range calls rewrite shifted blocks at new log
> > locations, intentionally leaving the file with 50 extents.
>
> This sounds odd. The test allocates a contigous range and then just does
> insert/collapse on it, which should not lead to any new data block
> allocations. Given that the test works fine on zoned XFS and btrfs
> with strict out of place write policies we know it does not require
> overwriting blocks to work as well.
>
> So I think something is fishy in f2fs if needs to allocate data blocks
> here.
I have the same question with Christoph. Shouldn't fcollapse in F2FS just
remap the metadata instead of allocating new data blocks?
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
To: Jan Prusakowski <jprusakowski@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/064: allow 50 extents on F2FS after fcollapse
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:37:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akKd2IImO7bRjVV2@zlang-mailbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajuLORVplOvEXvnI@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 12:46:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 07:04:38AM +0000, Jan Prusakowski wrote:
> > On F2FS, generic/064 fails with "extents mismatched before = 1 after =
> > 50" following multiple fcollapse (collapse range) operations.
> >
> > To ensure crash consistency and checkpoint integrity, F2FS forbids
> > in-place SSR (Summary Standalone Replacement) overwrites on valid
> > checkpointed blocks. When collapse range shifts blocks, F2FS allocates
> > new data pages in LFS mode (out-of-place log writes). As a result,
> > sequential collapse range calls rewrite shifted blocks at new log
> > locations, intentionally leaving the file with 50 extents.
>
> This sounds odd. The test allocates a contigous range and then just does
> insert/collapse on it, which should not lead to any new data block
> allocations. Given that the test works fine on zoned XFS and btrfs
> with strict out of place write policies we know it does not require
> overwriting blocks to work as well.
>
> So I think something is fishy in f2fs if needs to allocate data blocks
> here.
I have the same question with Christoph. Shouldn't fcollapse in F2FS just
remap the metadata instead of allocating new data blocks?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 7:04 [PATCH] generic/064: allow 50 extents on F2FS after fcollapse Jan Prusakowski
2026-06-22 7:04 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jan Prusakowski via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-23 8:46 ` Chao Yu
2026-06-23 8:46 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-24 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-24 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-29 16:37 ` Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-06-29 16:37 ` Zorro Lang
2026-06-30 12:09 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-30 12:09 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akKd2IImO7bRjVV2@zlang-mailbox \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jprusakowski@google.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.