All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 02:23:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <al3pFrj8eAV0MSSO@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719055602.78828-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 10:56:02PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable
> way by switching to an on-stack array.  Currently the fscrypt
> multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded
> limit of 8 block devices.  An on-stack array works fine for that.

Looks fine as a quick fix:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

> (Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block
> devices.  For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block
> device iteration into the filesystem.

I'd love to see this happen rather sooner than later, as that's a much
better architecture.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 02:23:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <al3pFrj8eAV0MSSO@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719055602.78828-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 10:56:02PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable
> way by switching to an on-stack array.  Currently the fscrypt
> multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded
> limit of 8 block devices.  An on-stack array works fine for that.

Looks fine as a quick fix:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

> (Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block
> devices.  For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block
> device iteration into the filesystem.

I'd love to see this happen rather sooner than later, as that's a much
better architecture.



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-19  5:56 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-19  5:56 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-20  9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-20  9:23   ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-20 17:45 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-20 17:45   ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=al3pFrj8eAV0MSSO@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.