AI Policy of the project.

AI Policy of the project.

[Borja Velasco]

Hello mlmmj users and developers.

I'm writing you because I'm starting project that wants to create a
community and software where the LLM usage is fully optional (now it's
not anymore since almost every system is being developed with LLMs so
you are using LLM indirectly).

I think that Software is a kind of art and we want a site where you
can really use human art in your computer. Of course, I understand
that no every person with think like me. I want to clarify that I
compare software as architecture, is art and is useful, there are real
structures that are beautiful and you'll love to be in and use it.
Software allows everyone to use this kind of useful art.

That's because I am doing a real effort to create a database of
software that uses LLMs or has been developed with LLMs and that
will use for our operations. (avoiding software creating with
LLMs in our main repositories and classifying the usage and
policy in this software to add to our "AI allowed repo" that only
wants to be really transparent with people to know how they're
using AI.

For that reason, before use your mail software as our mailing list
software "by default" and add it to our future repositories I need
to know if you are using LLMs to made new characteristics or for 
solving bugs or every use.

Of course, I have no problems with your LLM usage if you use
LLMs. I'm asking only for classification use.

Greetings, Borja.

Re: AI Policy of the project.

[Jona Müller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1787 bytes --]

Hello Borja,

this project has had a bunch of AI-assisted commits, you can read about it in
the following codeberg issue:

	https://codeberg.org/mlmmj/mlmmj/issues/105

Hope this helps,

- jm

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 12:19:38PM +0000, Borja Velasco wrote:
> Hello mlmmj users and developers.
> 
> I'm writing you because I'm starting project that wants to create a
> community and software where the LLM usage is fully optional (now it's
> not anymore since almost every system is being developed with LLMs so
> you are using LLM indirectly).
> 
> I think that Software is a kind of art and we want a site where you
> can really use human art in your computer. Of course, I understand
> that no every person with think like me. I want to clarify that I
> compare software as architecture, is art and is useful, there are real
> structures that are beautiful and you'll love to be in and use it.
> Software allows everyone to use this kind of useful art.
> 
> That's because I am doing a real effort to create a database of
> software that uses LLMs or has been developed with LLMs and that
> will use for our operations. (avoiding software creating with
> LLMs in our main repositories and classifying the usage and
> policy in this software to add to our "AI allowed repo" that only
> wants to be really transparent with people to know how they're
> using AI.
> 
> For that reason, before use your mail software as our mailing list
> software "by default" and add it to our future repositories I need
> to know if you are using LLMs to made new characteristics or for 
> solving bugs or every use.
> 
> Of course, I have no problems with your LLM usage if you use
> LLMs. I'm asking only for classification use.
> 
> Greetings, Borja.
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]