* any objection to a wide-sweeping "unifdef-y" -> "header-y" change?
@ 2009-12-29 12:26 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-12-29 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
given that the Kbuild "unifdef-y" directive was tagged as obsolete
in favour of "header-y" well over a year ago, any objection to just
standardizing everything on header-y and removing all support
for unifdef-y?
is there any compelling reason to *not* do that?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-12-29 12:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-29 12:26 any objection to a wide-sweeping "unifdef-y" -> "header-y" change? Robert P. J. Day
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.