All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe] any value in keeping the backward compat "task-core" stuff?
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:13:20 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407140612160.4257@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3833732.EFEfTvAqk5@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote:

> On Friday 11 July 2014 20:39:04 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > >   a number of the current packagegroup recipe files still have
> > >
> > > backward compatibility support for the old "task-core" names, seems
> > > like that's been there for well over a year, would it be safe to
> > > finally just toss that? seems like everyone's had enough time to make
> > > the move to the new names, and it would be clearer to not confuse the
> > > proper use of the word "task" these days.
> >
> > I agree; however this question should also be send to oe-core mailing
> > list (added in Cc)
>
> I agree as well; these should go. I know there are some who want to
> keep these indefinitely for upgrade purposes, but I think there's a
> limit to how long they should stay around in OE-Core. They can
> always be preserved in bbappends for those that do want to keep
> them.

  i can submit a patch for that later today if no one objects.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] any value in keeping the backward compat "task-core" stuff?
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:13:20 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407140612160.4257@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3833732.EFEfTvAqk5@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote:

> On Friday 11 July 2014 20:39:04 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > >   a number of the current packagegroup recipe files still have
> > >
> > > backward compatibility support for the old "task-core" names, seems
> > > like that's been there for well over a year, would it be safe to
> > > finally just toss that? seems like everyone's had enough time to make
> > > the move to the new names, and it would be clearer to not confuse the
> > > proper use of the word "task" these days.
> >
> > I agree; however this question should also be send to oe-core mailing
> > list (added in Cc)
>
> I agree as well; these should go. I know there are some who want to
> keep these indefinitely for upgrade purposes, but I think there's a
> limit to how long they should stay around in OE-Core. They can
> always be preserved in bbappends for those that do want to keep
> them.

  i can submit a patch for that later today if no one objects.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-14 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-10 15:21 any value in keeping the backward compat "task-core" stuff? Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-11 23:39 ` [oe] " Otavio Salvador
2014-07-11 23:39   ` Otavio Salvador
2014-07-14  9:37   ` [oe] " Paul Eggleton
2014-07-14  9:37     ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2014-07-14 10:13     ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2014-07-14 10:13       ` Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 10:31     ` [oe] " Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 10:31       ` [OE-core] " Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 11:05       ` [oe] " Paul Eggleton
2014-07-14 11:05         ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2014-07-14 11:39     ` [oe] " Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 11:39       ` [OE-core] " Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 12:14       ` [oe] " Paul Eggleton
2014-07-14 12:14         ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2014-07-14 12:22         ` [oe] " Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-14 12:22           ` [OE-core] " Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1407140612160.4257@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.