* should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package?
@ 2014-07-22 10:19 Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2014-07-22 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: BitBake developer list
i notice that, in "bitbake -h", the explanation of "bibake -e" is
that it potentially allows the display of "per-package" environment
info. should that not more accurately say "per-recipe"?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package?
2014-07-22 10:19 should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
2014-07-22 16:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Larson @ 2014-07-22 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: BitBake developer list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
wrote:
> i notice that, in "bitbake -h", the explanation of "bibake -e" is
> that it potentially allows the display of "per-package" environment
> info. should that not more accurately say "per-recipe"?
>
Yep.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 897 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package?
2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
@ 2014-07-22 16:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2014-07-22 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Larson; +Cc: BitBake developer list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 849 bytes --]
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Christopher Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> i notice that, in "bitbake -h", the explanation of "bibake -e" is
> that it potentially allows the display of "per-package" environment
> info. should that not more accurately say "per-recipe"?
>
>
> Yep.
ok, i'll submit patch for that tonight.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-22 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-22 10:19 should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package? Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
2014-07-22 16:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.