* unnecessary build of bzip2 when it's "required" for a dev host
@ 2015-01-10 11:35 Robert P. J. Day
2015-01-10 11:37 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2015-01-10 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto discussion list
more nitpicking pedantry, but i just noticed that on the quick start
page, there is the standard list of what the developer must install
beforehand:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html#yp-resources
and for both fedora and centos, the reader is instructed to install
(among other things) bzip2. but i'm pretty sure bzip2 is compiled as
part of the build tools as part of a standard build, no?
certainly, as part of my poky-based BBB, i can see
tmp/work/x86_64-linux/bzip2-native/. not a big deal, of course, but
apparently redundant. didn't bother checking if this is the case for
anything else.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: unnecessary build of bzip2 when it's "required" for a dev host
2015-01-10 11:35 unnecessary build of bzip2 when it's "required" for a dev host Robert P. J. Day
@ 2015-01-10 11:37 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2015-01-10 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto discussion list
On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> more nitpicking pedantry, but i just noticed that on the quick start
> page, there is the standard list of what the developer must install
> beforehand:
>
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html#yp-resources
>
> and for both fedora and centos, the reader is instructed to install
> (among other things) bzip2. but i'm pretty sure bzip2 is compiled as
> part of the build tools as part of a standard build, no?
>
> certainly, as part of my poky-based BBB, i can see
> tmp/work/x86_64-linux/bzip2-native/. not a big deal, of course, but
> apparently redundant. didn't bother checking if this is the case for
> anything else.
whoops, should have mentioned that the same observation holds for
the first chapter of the reference manual, section 1.3.2, "Required
Packages for the Host Development System."
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-10 11:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-10 11:35 unnecessary build of bzip2 when it's "required" for a dev host Robert P. J. Day
2015-01-10 11:37 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.