All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* what is the future for package_tar.bbclass?
@ 2015-01-10 15:16 Robert P. J. Day
  2015-01-19 22:57 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2015-01-10 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yocto discussion list


  once upon a time, richard purdie didn't see much use for the
packaging class file package_tar.bbclass:

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2014-July/094843.html

however, that packaging format is still mentioned at the very end of
section 3.4 in the YP reference manual. is there a plan for keeping
it, deleting it, ignoring it, etc?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: what is the future for package_tar.bbclass?
  2015-01-10 15:16 what is the future for package_tar.bbclass? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2015-01-19 22:57 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
  2015-01-20  8:43   ` Paul Eggleton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rifenbark, Scott M @ 2015-01-19 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day, Yocto discussion list

The class is broken and unsupported.  I have updated the docs indicating such.

Scott

>-----Original Message-----
>From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 7:16 AM
>To: Yocto discussion list
>Subject: [yocto] what is the future for package_tar.bbclass?
>
>
>  once upon a time, richard purdie didn't see much use for the packaging class
>file package_tar.bbclass:
>
>http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2014-
>July/094843.html
>
>however, that packaging format is still mentioned at the very end of section
>3.4 in the YP reference manual. is there a plan for keeping it, deleting it,
>ignoring it, etc?
>
>rday
>
>--
>
>===========================================================
>=============
>Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>                        http://crashcourse.ca
>
>Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
>LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
>===========================================================
>=============
>--
>_______________________________________________
>yocto mailing list
>yocto@yoctoproject.org
>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: what is the future for package_tar.bbclass?
  2015-01-19 22:57 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
@ 2015-01-20  8:43   ` Paul Eggleton
  2015-01-20 10:04     ` Robert P. J. Day
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2015-01-20  8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rifenbark, Scott M, Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: yocto

On Monday 19 January 2015 22:57:37 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> The class is broken and unsupported.  I have updated the docs indicating
> such.

I'm not sure that's true. It's not supported for building images, and it never 
has been. However it can be used for producing tarball packages for individual 
recipes.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: what is the future for package_tar.bbclass?
  2015-01-20  8:43   ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2015-01-20 10:04     ` Robert P. J. Day
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2015-01-20 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: yocto

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Eggleton wrote:

> On Monday 19 January 2015 22:57:37 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > The class is broken and unsupported.  I have updated the docs indicating
> > such.
>
> I'm not sure that's true. It's not supported for building images,
> and it never has been. However it can be used for producing tarball
> packages for individual recipes.

  i have no strong feelings either way, i was just repeating an
observation of mine from a while back that the tar packaging seemed to
get precious little attention compared to the three "standard"
packaging formats.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-20 10:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-10 15:16 what is the future for package_tar.bbclass? Robert P. J. Day
2015-01-19 22:57 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
2015-01-20  8:43   ` Paul Eggleton
2015-01-20 10:04     ` Robert P. J. Day

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.