Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] docs/zh_TW: process: localize terminology in code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst

[Weijie Yuan <wy@wyuan.org>]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 01:19:58PM +0800, 葉宸佑 wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 12:45:25AM +0800, Weijie Yuan wrote:
> > If the following comments are due to my overthinking, then
> >
> > Acked-by: Weijie Yuan <wy@wyuan.org>
> 
> Not overthinking at all -- two of the three are real improvements.
> Thanks for the Acked-by, I will carry it over.
> 
> > > +當個人在違規發生的場合承認自己的行為並作出彌補時
> >
> > In zh_CN, I think we prefer '纠正' (纠正行为). Just a reference.
> 
> You are right, and this is not a cross-strait difference. 彌補 in
> Taiwanese usage takes a loss or a shortfall as its object (彌補損失,
> 彌補不足), so 彌補行為 reads oddly. The English is "makes amends",
> i.e. corrects the behaviour, so 糾正 is the right word here and is
> equally natural in Taiwan. Will change to:
> 
>   當個人在違規發生的場合承認自己的行為並加以糾正時

Nice. Thanks.

> > > +行為準則委員會有責任與所有相關方合作，調查並解決這些報告。
> >
> > 处理报告 or 解决报告？I don't know Taiwan's preference.
> > I would do this in zh_CN:
> > 行为准则委员会有责任与所有相关方合作，对这类报告进行调查并予以处理。
> 
> Also right, and again not a regional difference -- 解決 takes a
> problem as its object, not a report, so 解決報告 is simply wrong in
> both variants. Taiwan says 處理報告 / 處理申訴. I will follow your
> sentence structure:
> 
>   行為準則委員會有責任與所有相關方合作，對這類報告進行調查並予以處理。
> 
> > > +行為準則委員會衷心希望，需要要求公開道歉的不可接受行為，在未來仍然極為罕見。
> >
> > 行为准则委员会衷心希望，那些需要公开道歉的不可接受行为在未来能继续成为极为
> > 罕见的现象。
> >
> > .. seems more clear and coherent?
> 
> This one I would rather keep as is, if you do not mind. Both are
> understandable, so this is a style call rather than a
> correctness one.

Agreed that this is just style call, so doesn't make much sense. I'm
definitely fine with your decision.

Thanks!