All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: fix release order of locks in zs_page_migrate()
@ 2026-07-28  5:53 Richard Chang
  2026-07-28  6:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Chang @ 2026-07-28  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Minchan Kim, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrew Morton
  Cc: Martin Liu, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Richard Chang

In zs_page_migrate(), locks are acquired in the following order:
  1. write_lock(&pool->lock)
  2. spin_lock(&class->lock)
  3. zspage_write_trylock(zspage)

However, upon successful page migration, they were being released in
forward acquisition (FIFO) order:
  1. write_unlock(&pool->lock)
  2. spin_unlock(&class->lock)
  3. zspage_write_unlock(zspage)

Fix the unlocking order to release locks in strict reverse (LIFO)
order of acquisition:
  3. zspage_write_unlock(zspage)
  2. spin_unlock(&class->lock)
  1. write_unlock(&pool->lock)

Releasing locks in reverse order of acquisition adheres to standard
kernel locking hygiene, prevents potential lock ordering and lockdep
inconsistencies.

Signed-off-by: Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>
---
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 83f5820c45f9..b09299115886 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -1772,9 +1772,9 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
 	 * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
 	 * it's okay to release migration_lock.
 	 */
-	write_unlock(&pool->lock);
-	spin_unlock(&class->lock);
 	zspage_write_unlock(zspage);
+	spin_unlock(&class->lock);
+	write_unlock(&pool->lock);
 
 	zpdesc_get(newzpdesc);
 	if (zpdesc_zone(newzpdesc) != zpdesc_zone(zpdesc)) {
-- 
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: fix release order of locks in zs_page_migrate()
  2026-07-28  5:53 [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: fix release order of locks in zs_page_migrate() Richard Chang
@ 2026-07-28  6:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2026-07-28  6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Richard Chang
  Cc: Minchan Kim, Sergey Senozhatsky, Martin Liu, linux-mm,
	linux-kernel

On (26/07/28 05:53), Richard Chang wrote:
> In zs_page_migrate(), locks are acquired in the following order:
>   1. write_lock(&pool->lock)
>   2. spin_lock(&class->lock)
>   3. zspage_write_trylock(zspage)
> 
> However, upon successful page migration, they were being released in
> forward acquisition (FIFO) order:
>   1. write_unlock(&pool->lock)
>   2. spin_unlock(&class->lock)
>   3. zspage_write_unlock(zspage)
> 
> Fix the unlocking order to release locks in strict reverse (LIFO)
> order of acquisition:
>   3. zspage_write_unlock(zspage)
>   2. spin_unlock(&class->lock)
>   1. write_unlock(&pool->lock)
> 
> Releasing locks in reverse order of acquisition adheres to standard
> kernel locking hygiene, prevents potential lock ordering and lockdep
> inconsistencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-28  6:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-28  5:53 [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: fix release order of locks in zs_page_migrate() Richard Chang
2026-07-28  6:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.