* [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB
@ 2026-07-27 8:08 ` Troy Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Troy Mitchell @ 2026-07-27 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti
Cc: linux-riscv, linux-kernel, spacemit, Anirudh Srinivasan,
Troy Mitchell
On RISC-V platforms where the entire physical memory (DRAM) resides
above the 32-bit address space (i.e., above dma32_phys_limit), the
current SWIOTLB initialization logic fails.
This patch addresses two interconnected issues on such platforms:
1. Incorrect 32-bit DMA bounce assumption:
The existing condition `max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit)` assumes
that a 32-bit DMA bounce buffer is required simply because the maximum
PFN exceeds the 32-bit limit. However, if all DRAM starts above 4GB,
no memory exists below the limit to satisfy this allocation. Fix
this by adding a check to ensure `memblock_start_of_DRAM()` is actually
below the 32-bit limit before enforcing 32-bit SWIOTLB.
2. kmalloc() bounce buffer allocation failure on non-coherent systems:
For non-coherent DMA, kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not
cache-line-aligned still require bouncing, even if 32-bit DMA bouncing
is skipped. Without the `SWIOTLB_ANY` flag, swiotlb_init() defaults to
allocating from low memory, which fails completely when DRAM only exists
in high memory. By appending `SWIOTLB_ANY` to swiotlb_flags, the allocator
is permitted to allocate this bounce buffer from high memory.
With this patch, systems with non-coherent DMA and DRAM entirely above
4GB can successfully map the software IO TLB in high memory and boot
normally.
Tested-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <asrinivasan@oss.tenstorrent.com>
Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
---
Changes in v3:
- clarify when kmalloc() buffers require bouncing for non-coherent DMA
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260429-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v2-1-fa99dfdfc94d@linux.dev
Changes in v2:
- add Anirudh's TB tag
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v1-1-74dd5e6be0f1@linux.dev
To: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 811e03786c56..7459e1fdb04a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ static void print_vm_layout(void) { }
void __init arch_mm_preinit(void)
{
- bool swiotlb = max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit);
+ bool swiotlb = max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit) &&
+ memblock_start_of_DRAM() < dma32_phys_limit;
+ unsigned int swiotlb_flags = SWIOTLB_VERBOSE;
#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
BUG_ON(!mem_map);
#endif /* CONFIG_FLATMEM */
@@ -176,17 +178,22 @@ void __init arch_mm_preinit(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC) && !swiotlb &&
dma_cache_alignment != 1) {
/*
- * If no bouncing needed for ZONE_DMA, allocate 1MB swiotlb
- * buffer per 1GB of RAM for kmalloc() bouncing on
- * non-coherent platforms.
+ * No 32-bit DMA bouncing needed (either all DRAM is within
+ * the 32-bit limit, or it all starts above it), but
+ * kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not cache-line-aligned
+ * still require bouncing for non-coherent DMA. Use
+ * SWIOTLB_ANY so that the buffer can be allocated from high
+ * memory when DRAM starts above dma32_phys_limit. Allocate
+ * ~1 MB per 1 GB of RAM.
*/
unsigned long size =
DIV_ROUND_UP(memblock_phys_mem_size(), 1024);
swiotlb_adjust_size(min(swiotlb_size_or_default(), size));
swiotlb = true;
+ swiotlb_flags |= SWIOTLB_ANY;
}
- swiotlb_init(swiotlb, SWIOTLB_VERBOSE);
+ swiotlb_init(swiotlb, swiotlb_flags);
print_vm_layout();
}
---
base-commit: 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f
change-id: 20260331-fix-riscv-swiotlb-6f1c226071d1
Best regards,
--
Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB
@ 2026-07-27 8:08 ` Troy Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Troy Mitchell @ 2026-07-27 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti
Cc: linux-riscv, linux-kernel, spacemit, Anirudh Srinivasan,
Troy Mitchell
On RISC-V platforms where the entire physical memory (DRAM) resides
above the 32-bit address space (i.e., above dma32_phys_limit), the
current SWIOTLB initialization logic fails.
This patch addresses two interconnected issues on such platforms:
1. Incorrect 32-bit DMA bounce assumption:
The existing condition `max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit)` assumes
that a 32-bit DMA bounce buffer is required simply because the maximum
PFN exceeds the 32-bit limit. However, if all DRAM starts above 4GB,
no memory exists below the limit to satisfy this allocation. Fix
this by adding a check to ensure `memblock_start_of_DRAM()` is actually
below the 32-bit limit before enforcing 32-bit SWIOTLB.
2. kmalloc() bounce buffer allocation failure on non-coherent systems:
For non-coherent DMA, kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not
cache-line-aligned still require bouncing, even if 32-bit DMA bouncing
is skipped. Without the `SWIOTLB_ANY` flag, swiotlb_init() defaults to
allocating from low memory, which fails completely when DRAM only exists
in high memory. By appending `SWIOTLB_ANY` to swiotlb_flags, the allocator
is permitted to allocate this bounce buffer from high memory.
With this patch, systems with non-coherent DMA and DRAM entirely above
4GB can successfully map the software IO TLB in high memory and boot
normally.
Tested-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <asrinivasan@oss.tenstorrent.com>
Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
---
Changes in v3:
- clarify when kmalloc() buffers require bouncing for non-coherent DMA
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260429-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v2-1-fa99dfdfc94d@linux.dev
Changes in v2:
- add Anirudh's TB tag
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v1-1-74dd5e6be0f1@linux.dev
To: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 811e03786c56..7459e1fdb04a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ static void print_vm_layout(void) { }
void __init arch_mm_preinit(void)
{
- bool swiotlb = max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit);
+ bool swiotlb = max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit) &&
+ memblock_start_of_DRAM() < dma32_phys_limit;
+ unsigned int swiotlb_flags = SWIOTLB_VERBOSE;
#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
BUG_ON(!mem_map);
#endif /* CONFIG_FLATMEM */
@@ -176,17 +178,22 @@ void __init arch_mm_preinit(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC) && !swiotlb &&
dma_cache_alignment != 1) {
/*
- * If no bouncing needed for ZONE_DMA, allocate 1MB swiotlb
- * buffer per 1GB of RAM for kmalloc() bouncing on
- * non-coherent platforms.
+ * No 32-bit DMA bouncing needed (either all DRAM is within
+ * the 32-bit limit, or it all starts above it), but
+ * kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not cache-line-aligned
+ * still require bouncing for non-coherent DMA. Use
+ * SWIOTLB_ANY so that the buffer can be allocated from high
+ * memory when DRAM starts above dma32_phys_limit. Allocate
+ * ~1 MB per 1 GB of RAM.
*/
unsigned long size =
DIV_ROUND_UP(memblock_phys_mem_size(), 1024);
swiotlb_adjust_size(min(swiotlb_size_or_default(), size));
swiotlb = true;
+ swiotlb_flags |= SWIOTLB_ANY;
}
- swiotlb_init(swiotlb, SWIOTLB_VERBOSE);
+ swiotlb_init(swiotlb, swiotlb_flags);
print_vm_layout();
}
---
base-commit: 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f
change-id: 20260331-fix-riscv-swiotlb-6f1c226071d1
Best regards,
--
Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB
2026-07-27 8:08 ` Troy Mitchell
@ 2026-07-29 17:20 ` Drew Fustini
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Drew Fustini @ 2026-07-29 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Troy Mitchell
Cc: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti,
linux-riscv, linux-kernel, spacemit, Anirudh Srinivasan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 01:08:44AM -0700, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> On RISC-V platforms where the entire physical memory (DRAM) resides
> above the 32-bit address space (i.e., above dma32_phys_limit), the
> current SWIOTLB initialization logic fails.
>
> This patch addresses two interconnected issues on such platforms:
>
> 1. Incorrect 32-bit DMA bounce assumption:
> The existing condition `max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit)` assumes
> that a 32-bit DMA bounce buffer is required simply because the maximum
> PFN exceeds the 32-bit limit. However, if all DRAM starts above 4GB,
> no memory exists below the limit to satisfy this allocation. Fix
> this by adding a check to ensure `memblock_start_of_DRAM()` is actually
> below the 32-bit limit before enforcing 32-bit SWIOTLB.
>
> 2. kmalloc() bounce buffer allocation failure on non-coherent systems:
> For non-coherent DMA, kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not
> cache-line-aligned still require bouncing, even if 32-bit DMA bouncing
> is skipped. Without the `SWIOTLB_ANY` flag, swiotlb_init() defaults to
> allocating from low memory, which fails completely when DRAM only exists
> in high memory. By appending `SWIOTLB_ANY` to swiotlb_flags, the allocator
> is permitted to allocate this bounce buffer from high memory.
>
> With this patch, systems with non-coherent DMA and DRAM entirely above
> 4GB can successfully map the software IO TLB in high memory and boot
> normally.
>
> Tested-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <asrinivasan@oss.tenstorrent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - clarify when kmalloc() buffers require bouncing for non-coherent DMA
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260429-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v2-1-fa99dfdfc94d@linux.dev
>
> Changes in v2:
> - add Anirudh's TB tag
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v1-1-74dd5e6be0f1@linux.dev
Maybe fixes tag should be added like this?
Fixes: dcb2743d1e70 ("riscv: mm: still create swiotlb buffer for kmalloc() bouncing if required")
Aside from that, LGTM and resolves the issue for Linux running on the
X280 clusters in the Tenstorrent Blackhole.
Reviewed-by: Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Drew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB
@ 2026-07-29 17:20 ` Drew Fustini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Drew Fustini @ 2026-07-29 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Troy Mitchell
Cc: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti,
linux-riscv, linux-kernel, spacemit, Anirudh Srinivasan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 01:08:44AM -0700, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> On RISC-V platforms where the entire physical memory (DRAM) resides
> above the 32-bit address space (i.e., above dma32_phys_limit), the
> current SWIOTLB initialization logic fails.
>
> This patch addresses two interconnected issues on such platforms:
>
> 1. Incorrect 32-bit DMA bounce assumption:
> The existing condition `max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit)` assumes
> that a 32-bit DMA bounce buffer is required simply because the maximum
> PFN exceeds the 32-bit limit. However, if all DRAM starts above 4GB,
> no memory exists below the limit to satisfy this allocation. Fix
> this by adding a check to ensure `memblock_start_of_DRAM()` is actually
> below the 32-bit limit before enforcing 32-bit SWIOTLB.
>
> 2. kmalloc() bounce buffer allocation failure on non-coherent systems:
> For non-coherent DMA, kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not
> cache-line-aligned still require bouncing, even if 32-bit DMA bouncing
> is skipped. Without the `SWIOTLB_ANY` flag, swiotlb_init() defaults to
> allocating from low memory, which fails completely when DRAM only exists
> in high memory. By appending `SWIOTLB_ANY` to swiotlb_flags, the allocator
> is permitted to allocate this bounce buffer from high memory.
>
> With this patch, systems with non-coherent DMA and DRAM entirely above
> 4GB can successfully map the software IO TLB in high memory and boot
> normally.
>
> Tested-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <asrinivasan@oss.tenstorrent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - clarify when kmalloc() buffers require bouncing for non-coherent DMA
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260429-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v2-1-fa99dfdfc94d@linux.dev
>
> Changes in v2:
> - add Anirudh's TB tag
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331-fix-riscv-swiotlb-v1-1-74dd5e6be0f1@linux.dev
Maybe fixes tag should be added like this?
Fixes: dcb2743d1e70 ("riscv: mm: still create swiotlb buffer for kmalloc() bouncing if required")
Aside from that, LGTM and resolves the issue for Linux running on the
X280 clusters in the Tenstorrent Blackhole.
Reviewed-by: Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Drew
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB
2026-07-27 8:08 ` Troy Mitchell
@ 2026-07-29 17:46 ` Paul Walmsley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Walmsley @ 2026-07-29 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Troy Mitchell
Cc: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti,
linux-riscv, linux-kernel, spacemit, Anirudh Srinivasan
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> On RISC-V platforms where the entire physical memory (DRAM) resides
> above the 32-bit address space (i.e., above dma32_phys_limit), the
> current SWIOTLB initialization logic fails.
>
> This patch addresses two interconnected issues on such platforms:
>
> 1. Incorrect 32-bit DMA bounce assumption:
> The existing condition `max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit)` assumes
> that a 32-bit DMA bounce buffer is required simply because the maximum
> PFN exceeds the 32-bit limit. However, if all DRAM starts above 4GB,
> no memory exists below the limit to satisfy this allocation. Fix
> this by adding a check to ensure `memblock_start_of_DRAM()` is actually
> below the 32-bit limit before enforcing 32-bit SWIOTLB.
>
> 2. kmalloc() bounce buffer allocation failure on non-coherent systems:
> For non-coherent DMA, kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not
> cache-line-aligned still require bouncing, even if 32-bit DMA bouncing
> is skipped. Without the `SWIOTLB_ANY` flag, swiotlb_init() defaults to
> allocating from low memory, which fails completely when DRAM only exists
> in high memory. By appending `SWIOTLB_ANY` to swiotlb_flags, the allocator
> is permitted to allocate this bounce buffer from high memory.
>
> With this patch, systems with non-coherent DMA and DRAM entirely above
> 4GB can successfully map the software IO TLB in high memory and boot
> normally.
>
> Tested-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <asrinivasan@oss.tenstorrent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
Thanks, queued for v7.2-rc.
- Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB
@ 2026-07-29 17:46 ` Paul Walmsley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Walmsley @ 2026-07-29 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Troy Mitchell
Cc: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti,
linux-riscv, linux-kernel, spacemit, Anirudh Srinivasan
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> On RISC-V platforms where the entire physical memory (DRAM) resides
> above the 32-bit address space (i.e., above dma32_phys_limit), the
> current SWIOTLB initialization logic fails.
>
> This patch addresses two interconnected issues on such platforms:
>
> 1. Incorrect 32-bit DMA bounce assumption:
> The existing condition `max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit)` assumes
> that a 32-bit DMA bounce buffer is required simply because the maximum
> PFN exceeds the 32-bit limit. However, if all DRAM starts above 4GB,
> no memory exists below the limit to satisfy this allocation. Fix
> this by adding a check to ensure `memblock_start_of_DRAM()` is actually
> below the 32-bit limit before enforcing 32-bit SWIOTLB.
>
> 2. kmalloc() bounce buffer allocation failure on non-coherent systems:
> For non-coherent DMA, kmalloc() buffers whose sizes are not
> cache-line-aligned still require bouncing, even if 32-bit DMA bouncing
> is skipped. Without the `SWIOTLB_ANY` flag, swiotlb_init() defaults to
> allocating from low memory, which fails completely when DRAM only exists
> in high memory. By appending `SWIOTLB_ANY` to swiotlb_flags, the allocator
> is permitted to allocate this bounce buffer from high memory.
>
> With this patch, systems with non-coherent DMA and DRAM entirely above
> 4GB can successfully map the software IO TLB in high memory and boot
> normally.
>
> Tested-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <asrinivasan@oss.tenstorrent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
Thanks, queued for v7.2-rc.
- Paul
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-29 17:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-27 8:08 [PATCH v3] riscv: mm: fix SWIOTLB initialization for systems with DRAM above 4GB Troy Mitchell
2026-07-27 8:08 ` Troy Mitchell
2026-07-29 17:20 ` Drew Fustini
2026-07-29 17:20 ` Drew Fustini
2026-07-29 17:46 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-07-29 17:46 ` Paul Walmsley
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.