From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
david@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/mm: add hwpoison-panic tool
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 03:19:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an2Yr4n6ahggXKo1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be68a841-a326-4826-8e02-5148736dd356@huawei.com>
Hello Miaohe,
First of all, thanks for looking at this one.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2026/8/3 19:31, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > +static int pick_kpageflags_phys_addr(uint64_t want, uint64_t *phys_addr)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t pfn = (16UL << 20) / page_size;
>
> Could we use SZ_16M macro here?
Sure, for that I will include ../../include/linux/sizes.h in the next
version.
> > +/* hard_offline_page() injects with MF_SW_SIMULATED, so unpoison is allowed. */
> > +static void unpoison_pfn(uint64_t pfn)
> > +{
> > + char path[PATH_MAX], buf[32];
> > + const char *debugfs;
> > + int fd, len;
> > +
> > + debugfs = debugfs__mount();
>
> I might be miss something but I can't find the implementation of debugfs__mount.
It is an ugly macro declared in tools/lib/api/fs/fs.h:
#define FS(name) \
const char *name##__mountpoint(void); \
const char *name##__mount(void); \
bool name##__configured(void);
And then:
FS(debugfs)
> > + if (access(INJECT_PATH, W_OK))
> > + fatal("%s not present (no MEMORY_HOTPLUG?)\n", INJECT_PATH);
>
> MEMORY_HOTPLUG?
lol. it should be MEMORY_FAILURE
I will get these points fixed and respin.
--breno
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
david@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/mm: add hwpoison-panic tool
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 03:19:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an2Yr4n6ahggXKo1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be68a841-a326-4826-8e02-5148736dd356@huawei.com>
Hello Miaohe,
First of all, thanks for looking at this one.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2026/8/3 19:31, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > +static int pick_kpageflags_phys_addr(uint64_t want, uint64_t *phys_addr)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t pfn = (16UL << 20) / page_size;
>
> Could we use SZ_16M macro here?
Sure, for that I will include ../../include/linux/sizes.h in the next
version.
> > +/* hard_offline_page() injects with MF_SW_SIMULATED, so unpoison is allowed. */
> > +static void unpoison_pfn(uint64_t pfn)
> > +{
> > + char path[PATH_MAX], buf[32];
> > + const char *debugfs;
> > + int fd, len;
> > +
> > + debugfs = debugfs__mount();
>
> I might be miss something but I can't find the implementation of debugfs__mount.
It is an ugly macro declared in tools/lib/api/fs/fs.h:
#define FS(name) \
const char *name##__mountpoint(void); \
const char *name##__mount(void); \
bool name##__configured(void);
And then:
FS(debugfs)
> > + if (access(INJECT_PATH, W_OK))
> > + fatal("%s not present (no MEMORY_HOTPLUG?)\n", INJECT_PATH);
>
> MEMORY_HOTPLUG?
lol. it should be MEMORY_FAILURE
I will get these points fixed and respin.
--breno
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 11:31 [PATCH v2] tools/mm: add hwpoison-panic tool Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 11:31 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-13 7:32 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-08-13 7:32 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-08-13 10:19 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-08-13 10:19 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=an2Yr4n6ahggXKo1@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.