All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Wang <li.wang@linux.dev>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>,
	Xuewen Wang <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] memcg/functional: fix memcg_failcnt intermittent timeout by disabling swap
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:20:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anV5J8HZ-agTZpAB@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a756e7a.cc089686.309364.c33e@mx.google.com>

Hi Xuewen, Andrea,

On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 05:34:49AM +0000, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> Hi Li,
> 
> > Fair point that ignoring the return status defeats the purpose. But I'd
> > rather not TBROK on a swapoff failure, that's an environment limitation,
> > not a test failure. Especially swapoff here is an enhancement but not
> > a hard requirement for this test.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > That is a bit over-engineering.
> > 
> > If an inactive fstab entry gets activated by swapon -a, that arguably
> > points to a misconfigured test host rather than something this test
> > should work around.
> 
> And also here. Unfortunately we don't have enough data for shell tests,
> so AI agent is not really working well in there..
> 
> Honestly I don't know how to fix this but adding more examples which
> we don't have..

No worries, AI agent being too strict in reviewing is not a bad thing.
It inspires me to think about something maybe in a different way.

Like this patch, I am now thinking if we can just limit it only
inside the cgroup:

--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_failcnt.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_failcnt.sh
@@ -17,18 +17,17 @@ TST_CLEANUP=do_cleanup
 do_setup()
 {
        memcg_setup
-       swapoff -a
 }

 do_cleanup()
 {
-       swapon -a
        memcg_cleanup
 }

 do_test()
 {
        ROD echo $MEMORY_LIMIT \> memory.limit_in_bytes
+       ROD echo 0 \> memory.swappiness

        start_memcg_process $2 -s ${MEMORY_TO_ALLOCATE}
        ROD echo $MEMCG_PROCESS_PID \> tasks

@Xuewen, can you try this patch and see if it can solve your problem?

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07  1:44 [LTP] [PATCH v3] memcg/functional: fix memcg_failcnt intermittent timeout by disabling swap Xuewen Wang
2026-08-07  2:51 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-07  3:52   ` Li Wang
2026-08-07  5:34     ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-08-07  6:20       ` Li Wang [this message]
2026-08-07  3:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Li Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-05  6:40 [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Xuewen Wang
2026-08-05  7:40 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-31  1:49 [LTP] [PATCH] " Xuewen Wang
2026-07-31  2:46 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-03 13:38   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anV5J8HZ-agTZpAB@linux.dev \
    --to=li.wang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=wangxuewen@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.