From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Adrian Barnaś" <abarnas@google.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Gerald Schaefer" <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <pjw@kernel.org>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"WANG Xuerui" <kernel@xen0n.name>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm/vmalloc: set area's page_order after allocation succeeds
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:31:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoNFZU_QzghDBgbZ@milan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816-execmem-set-vm-perms-v0-2-v1-2-90944a3ad43f@kernel.org>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 01:59:25PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
> __vmalloc_area_node() calls set_vm_area_page_order() to set area's
> page_order before actually allocating pages to populate the area.
>
> If allocation of large pages in HUGE_VMAP case fails midway, this leaves
> the area with elevated page_order throughout the cleanup path.
>
> There is no actual issue with this because the only place that currently
> relies on area->page_order on the cleanup path is the loop calculating
> the direct map alias range in vm_reset_perms() and it anyway skips
> unpopulated pages.
>
> But having set_vm_area_page_order() in the middle of __vmalloc_area_node()
> makes things very obscure, hard to reason about and error prone against
> future changes of the cleanup path.
>
> Move the call to set_vm_area_page_order() after __vmalloc_area_node()
> succeeded where page order is guaranteed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 22566e0b6e38..6822f0fe9583 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3901,8 +3901,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - set_vm_area_page_order(area, page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
> - page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
> + page_order = page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> /*
> * High-order nofail allocations are really expensive and
> @@ -4106,6 +4105,14 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
> if (!ret)
> goto fail;
>
> + /*
> + * Set area->page_order once it's known exactly that the order of the
> + * pages the area contains.
> + * Even if we succeeded to partially populate the area with large pages,
> + * still treat the area as populated with order-0 pages.
> + */
> + set_vm_area_page_order(area, shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> /*
> * Mark the pages as accessible, now that they are mapped.
> * The condition for setting KASAN_VMALLOC_INIT should complement the
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
OK, can we just set it right after the:
area->nr_pages = vm_area_alloc_pages(
vmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp_mask, page_order), node,
page_order, nr_small_pages, area->pages);
succeeds?
I am not sure there is a good reason to move it out of the
__vmalloc_area_node().
--
Uladzislau Rezki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Adrian Barnaś" <abarnas@google.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Gerald Schaefer" <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <pjw@kernel.org>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"WANG Xuerui" <kernel@xen0n.name>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm/vmalloc: set area's page_order after allocation succeeds
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:31:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoNFZU_QzghDBgbZ@milan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816-execmem-set-vm-perms-v0-2-v1-2-90944a3ad43f@kernel.org>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 01:59:25PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
> __vmalloc_area_node() calls set_vm_area_page_order() to set area's
> page_order before actually allocating pages to populate the area.
>
> If allocation of large pages in HUGE_VMAP case fails midway, this leaves
> the area with elevated page_order throughout the cleanup path.
>
> There is no actual issue with this because the only place that currently
> relies on area->page_order on the cleanup path is the loop calculating
> the direct map alias range in vm_reset_perms() and it anyway skips
> unpopulated pages.
>
> But having set_vm_area_page_order() in the middle of __vmalloc_area_node()
> makes things very obscure, hard to reason about and error prone against
> future changes of the cleanup path.
>
> Move the call to set_vm_area_page_order() after __vmalloc_area_node()
> succeeded where page order is guaranteed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 22566e0b6e38..6822f0fe9583 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3901,8 +3901,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - set_vm_area_page_order(area, page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
> - page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
> + page_order = page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> /*
> * High-order nofail allocations are really expensive and
> @@ -4106,6 +4105,14 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
> if (!ret)
> goto fail;
>
> + /*
> + * Set area->page_order once it's known exactly that the order of the
> + * pages the area contains.
> + * Even if we succeeded to partially populate the area with large pages,
> + * still treat the area as populated with order-0 pages.
> + */
> + set_vm_area_page_order(area, shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> /*
> * Mark the pages as accessible, now that they are mapped.
> * The condition for setting KASAN_VMALLOC_INIT should complement the
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
OK, can we just set it right after the:
area->nr_pages = vm_area_alloc_pages(
vmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp_mask, page_order), node,
page_order, nr_small_pages, area->pages);
succeeds?
I am not sure there is a good reason to move it out of the
__vmalloc_area_node().
--
Uladzislau Rezki
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 10:59 [PATCH 0/6] arch, mm/execmem: resolve confusion about set_direct_map_valid_noflush() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] set_memory: add number of pages parameter to set_direct_map APIs Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 11:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 12:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-08-17 12:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-08-16 10:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/vmalloc: set area's page_order after allocation succeeds Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 11:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 17:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2026-08-17 17:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-08-16 10:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/vmalloc: constify vm parameter of get_vm_area_page_order() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 11:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-16 10:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/vmalloc: make set_area_direct_map HUGE_VMAP friendly Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 11:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 12:21 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-08-17 12:21 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-08-16 10:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/execmem: use VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS for ROX cache allocations Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 11:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-16 10:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] Revert "arch: introduce set_direct_map_valid_noflush()" Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 10:59 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-16 11:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 15:14 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-08-17 15:14 ` Brendan Jackman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoNFZU_QzghDBgbZ@milan \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=abarnas@google.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.