All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Grayson Gordon <graysongordon1@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, avarab@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] http: add http.sslVerifyStatus to check stapled OCSP responses
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:24:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <apWOuGbOErZt9jo8@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqik4qz86h.fsf@gitster.g>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 07:16:54AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> >> They do look involved but seem to cover the situations we do care
> >> about, except we seem not to test when the server does not explicitly
> >> say "this is still good", or am I not reading the tests correctly?
> >
> > Isn't the following test covering that scenario? Or am I misreading?
> >
> >     test_expect_success SSL_VERIFYSTATUS 'fetch succeeds with stapled "good" OCSP response'
> >            with_ssl_verification git -c http.sslVerifyStatus=true \
> >                    ls-remote "$HTTPD_URL/smart/repo.git" >actual &&
> >            test_line_count -gt 0 actual
> >     '
> 
> Probably I misstated.  What I meant was a reaction to "fail close"
> floated earlier.  A server does not explicitly give stapled good,
> and the client says "this is not known-good" and not talking to it.
> I.e. 'fetch fails without stapled "good"'

Ah, I think you're correct, my tests didn't include that. But Grayson's
already did as it doesn't require any setup, so that's why I didn't
include it specifically.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 17:02 [PATCH] http: add http.sslVerifyStatus to check stapled OCSP responses graysongordon-gl
2026-08-11 19:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-11 20:44 ` [PATCH v2] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-12  6:25   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-12 15:53     ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-12 14:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-12 18:25     ` [PATCH v3] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-12 21:34       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-13 16:06         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-17 18:52           ` [PATCH v4] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-17 19:19             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18  7:50             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:51               ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-19  8:14                 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 16:40               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 19:37           ` [PATCH v5] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-18 20:12             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 21:22               ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-18 21:48           ` [PATCH v6] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-26 22:01             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-28 13:51               ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-28 17:20                 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-31  6:56                   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-31 14:16                     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-31 14:24                       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-08-31 14:31                         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-08 12:55                           ` Grayson Gordon
2026-09-15 16:23                           ` [PATCH v7] " graysongordon-gl
2026-09-16 19:29                             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-23 12:42                             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-23 21:43                               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-23 21:07                             ` SZEDER Gábor
2026-09-23 21:47                               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24  7:41                                 ` SZEDER Gábor
2026-09-24  7:59                                   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-25  9:28                                     ` SZEDER Gábor
2026-09-25 16:13                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24 16:22                                   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=apWOuGbOErZt9jo8@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=graysongordon1@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.